Article published In: Pragmatics and Society: Online-First Articles
Identity dynamics in text messaging
A case study of Chinese private tutors’ communication accommodation on WeChat
Published online: 26 August 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.22036.son
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.22036.son
Abstract
Communication via text messaging has become a driving force to establish and maintain texters’ identities on
social media. Drawing upon a pragmatic view of identity construction, this study probes into Chinese private tutors’ text messages
on WeChat and the way they accommodate texts and emojis to adjust different digital identities. Findings show that Chinese private
tutors’ digital identities should not be understood as something stable but rather as a changing process that is constructed and
accommodated through different social contacts. They have projected identities in the messages either as authoritative teachers
for students or as reliable providers of service for parents. The dynamic construction of social identity reflects the
education-business nature of private supplementary tutoring in China and private tutors’ struggle for a balance between commercial
mandates and professional ethics in texting identities. This study contributes to the understanding of Chinese private tutors’
management of digital identity on WeChat.
Keywords: messages, identity, communication accommodation, private tutors, WeChat
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Communication features of text messaging on WeChat
- 3.Communication accommodation in text messages
- 4.Research design
- 4.1Data collection
- 4.2Methodology and procedure
- 5.Analysis and results
- 5.1Shift between “real teacher” and “service provider”
- 5.1.1“tutor-to-student” interaction: Authority reinforced in the divergence process
- 5.1.2“tutor-to-parent” interaction: Authority eliminated in the convergence process
- 5.2Accommodative representation of identity dynamics on WeChat
- 5.1Shift between “real teacher” and “service provider”
- 6.Discussion and conclusion
References
References (49)
Adams, Aubrie, and Miles, Jai. 2023. “Examining
textism convergence in mediated interactions.” Language
Sciences 991,101568.
Benwell, Bethan, and Stokeo, Elizabeth. 2006. Discourse
and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Bolander, Brook, and Miriam, Locher. 2010. “Constructing
Identity on Facebook: Report on A Pilot Study.” In: Performing the
Self, ed. by Junod, Karen and Didier Maillat, 165–185. Tübingen: Narr
Booth, Wayne C. 2004. The Rhetoric of Rhetoric: The Quest for
Effective
Communication. London: Blackwell.
Brinberg, Miriam, and Ram, Nilam. 2021. “Do
new romantic couples use more similar language over time? Evidence from intensive longitudinal text
messages.” Journal of
Communication 71(3), 454–477.
Bunz, Ulla, and Campbell, Scott W. 2004. “Politeness
accommodation in electronic mail.” Communication Research
Reports 21(1), 11–25.
Cappallo, Spencer, Svetlichnaya, Stacey, Garrigues, Pierre, Mensink, Thomas, Snoek, Cees G. M. 2019. “New modality: Emoji
challenges in prediction, anticipation, and retrieval.” IEEE Transactions on
Multimedia 21(2), 402–415.
Chen, Lisha, Chin, Fei, Goh, Sun, Yifan, and Amran Rasli. 2017. “Integrating
guanxi into technology acceptance: An empirical investigation of WeChat.” Telematics and
Informatics 34(7):1125–1142.
Eisenlauer, Volker. 2014. “Facebook
as a third author (semi)automated participation frameworks in Social Network Sites.” Journal of
Pragmatics 721: 73–85.
Feng, Siyuan. 2020. Private
Tutors’ Perceptions of Mixed Identities and Negotiated Roles: A Sociocultural Investigation in Zhengzhou Tutorial Centres,
China. (Thesis). University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Gallois, Cindy, Ogay, Tania, and Giles, Howard. 2005. “Communication
Accommodation Theory: A Look Back and a Look Ahead.” In: Theorizing
about Intercultural Communication, ed. by William, B. Gudykunst, 121–148. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Gasiorek, Jessica, and Dragojevic, Marko. 2017. “The
effects of accumulated underaccommodation on perceptions of underaccommodative communication and
speakers.” Human Communication
Research 43(2), 276–294.
Ge, Jing, and Ulrike Gretzel. 2018. “Emoji
rhetoric: a social media influencer perspective.” Journal of Marketing
Management 34(15–16), 1272–1295.
Gibson, Anna. 2019. “Free
speech and safe spaces: how moderation policies shape online discussion spaces.” Social Media
Society 5(1), 1–15.
Giles, Howard, Edwards, America L., and Walther, Joseph B. 2023. “Communication
accommodation theory: Past accomplishments, current trends, and future prospects.” Language
Sciences 991, 101571.
Giles, Howard, and Powesland, Peter. 1997. “Accommodation
Theory.” In: Sociolinguistics: A Reader, ed.
by Nikolas, Coupland, and Adam, Jaworski, 232–239. London: Palgrave.
Giles, Howard, and Wadleigh, Paul M. 2008. “Accommodating
nonverbally.” In: The Nonverbal Communication Reader: Classic and
Contemporary Readings, ed. by Laura, K. Guerrero, and Michael, L. Hecht, 491–502. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Hogan, Bernie. 2010. “The
presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions
online.” Bulletin of Science, Technology &
Society 30(6), 377–386.
Kiong, Tong Chee, and Kee, Yong Pit. 1998. “Guanxi bases, Xinyong
and Chinese business networks.” The British Journal of
Sociology 49(1), 75–96.
Kobakhidze, Magda Nutsa. 2016. Teachers as Tutors: Shadow
Education Market Dynamics in
Georgia. London: Springer.
Liao, Wang, Bazarova, Natalya N., and Yuan, Connie Y. 2018. “Expertise judgement and
communication accommodation in linguistic styles in computer-mediated and face-to-face
groups.” Communication
Research 45 (8), 1122–1145.
Liu, Dewen, Gong, Chenyiming, Zhang, Sikang, Ma, Yongbin. 2022. “The
influence of firm’s feedbacks on user-generated content’s linguistic style matching–An explanation based on communication
accommodation theory.” Frontiers in
Psychology 131.
Marko, Karoline. 2022. “‘Depends
on who I’m writing to’: The influence of addressees and personality traits on the use of emoji and emoticons, and related
implications for forensic authorship analysis.” Frontiers in
Communication, 71.
McGlone, Matthew, and Giles, Howard. 2011. “Language
and interpersonal communication.” In: The Sage Handbook of
Interpersonal Communication, ed. by Knapp, Mark L., and Daly, John A. 201–237. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McSweeney, Michelle A. 2018. The Pragmatics of Text Messaging:
Making Meaning in
Messages. London: Routledge.
Merriam, Sharan B., and Tisdell, Elizabeth J. 2009. Qualitative Research: A Guide
to Design and Implementation. San Francisco: Lohn Wiley & Sons. Inc.
Muir, Kate, Joinson, Adam, Cotterill, Rachel, and Dewdney, Nigel. 2017. “Linguistic
style accommodation shapes impression formation and rapport in computer-mediated
communication.” Journal of Language and Social
Psychology 36(5), 525–548.
Ou, Carol X. J., and Davison, Robert M. 2016. “Shaping guanxi networks
at work through instant messaging.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and
Technology 67 (5), 1153–1168.
Parkwell, Corina. 2019. “Emoji
as social semiotic resources for meaning-making in discourse: Mapping the functions of the toilet emoji in Cher’s tweets about
Donald Trump.” Discourse, Context &
Media 301: 100307.
Sampietro, Agnese. 2019. Emoji
and Rapport Management in Spanish WhatsApp Chats. Journal of
Pragmatics 1431, 109–120.
Schandorf, Michael. 2012. “Mediated
gesture: Paralinguistic communication and phatic text.” Convergence: The International Journal
of Research into New Media
Technologies 19(3): 319–344.
Schneider, Stefan. 2010. “Mitigation.” In: Interpersonal
Pragmatics, ed. by Miriam A. Locher and Sage L. Graham, 253–269. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.
Searle, John R. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the
Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Soldo, Andrea, and Jokić, Boris. 2013. “The
Role of Teachers in the Decision Concerning Use of Private Tutoring
Services.” In: Emerging from the Shadow: A Comparative Qualitative
Exploration of Private Tutoring in Eurasia. ed. by Boris, Jokić, 115–164. Zagreb: Network of Education Policy Centers.
Tomsha, Luke, and Hernandez, Roberto. 2013. “Communication
Accommodation Theory.” In: Introducing Communication Theory: Analysis
and Application, ed. by Richard, L. West, and Lynn, H. Turner. 465–482. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill Education.
Wang, Haiyan, and Crosthwaite, Peter. 2021. “The
affordances of WeChat Voice Messaging for Chinese EFL learners during private
tutoring.” Computer-Assisted Language
Learning 22(1), 223–245.
Watson, Rod. 2009. Analyzing
Practical and Professional Texts: A Naturalistic
Approach. Farnham: Ashgate.
Wodak, Ruth, de Cilla, Rudolf, Reisigl, Martin and Liebhart, Karin. 2009. The
Discursive Construction of National
Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Xiong, Tao, Li, Qiuna, and Hu, Guangwei. 2020. “Teaching
English in the shadow: identity construction of private English language tutors in
China.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of
Education 43(1), 73–85.
Yen, Dorothy A., Abosag, Ibrahim, Huang, Yu-An, and Nguyen, Bang. 2017. “Guanxi
GRX (ganqing, renqing, xinren) and conflict management in Sino-US business
relationships.” Industrial Marketing
Management 661,103–114.
Yung, Kevin W. H., and Yuan, Rui. 2020. “‘The
most popular star-tutor of English’: discursive construction of tutor identities in shadow
education.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of
Education 41(1), 153–168.
Zhang, Wei, and Bray, Mark. 2020. “Comparative
research on shadow education: Achievements, challenges, and the agenda ahead.” European Journal
of
Education 55(3), 322–341.
Zhang, Yan B., and Giles, Howard. 2018. “Communication
Accommodation Theory.” In: The International Encyclopedia of
Intercultural Communication, ed. by Young, Y. Kim, 95–108. Hoboken: Wiley.
Zhang, Yiqiong, Wang, Min, and Li, Ying. 2021. “More
than playfulness: Emojis in the comments of a WeChat official account.” Internet
Pragmatics 4(2): 247–271.