Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 14:6 (2023) ► pp.807–823
An epistemic interpretation of responses to advice resistance on Chinese phone-ins of family problem counseling
Published online: 18 April 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.22032.pen
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.22032.pen
Abstract
At present, Epistemics is a popular theory in Western conversation analysis, but few scholars investigate the
responses to the advice resistance on phone-ins from the perspective of Epistemics. This paper explores the responses to the
advice resistance on Chinese phone-ins of family problem counseling from the perspective of Epistemics. It is found that when
responding to the caller’s advice resistance, the host often implements two conversation practices, such as maintaining his/her
original higher epistemic status or constructing higher epistemic status in another epistemic domain. These practices are
consistent with the possibility of the host’s knowledge orientation to strong self-confidence in his/her own professional
knowledge but the lack of confidence in the caller’s relevant knowledge. This study can provide enlightenment for the smooth
development of advice interaction on phone-ins of family problem counseling and expand the application scope of Epistemics.
Keywords: family problems, phone-ins, responses, advice resistance, Epistemics
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The studies concerning Epistemics
- 3.Advice, resistance to advice and its responses
- 4.Data
- 5.Data analysis
- 5.1Maintaining original higher epistemic status
- 5.1.1Hypothesizing knowledge
- 5.1.2Explaining knowledge
- 5.2Constructing higher epistemic status in another epistemic domain
- 5.1Maintaining original higher epistemic status
- 6.Discussion
- 7.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Declaration of conflicting interests
- Notes
References
References (31)
Anderson, Lorin W., David R. Krathwohl, Peter W. Airasian, Kathleen A. Cruikshank, Richard E. Mayer, Paul R. Pintrich, James Raths, and Merlin C. Wittrock. 2001. A
Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Abridged
Edition). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Marja Etelämäki. 2015. “Nominated
Actions and Their Targeted Agents in Finnish Conversational Directives.” Journal of
Pragmatics 78(3): 7–24.
Emmison, Michael, and Alan Firth. 2012. “Requesting
and Receiving Advice on the Telephone: An Analysis of Telephone Helplines in
Australia.” In Advice in Discourse, ed.
by Holger Limberg, and Miriam A. Locher, 213–232. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Haugh, Michael. 2013. “Im/politeness,
Social Practice and the Participation Order.” Journal of
Pragmatics 58(11): 52–72.
Hayano, Kaoru. 2013. “Question
Design in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation
Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 395–414. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hepburn, Alexa, Chloe Shaw, and Jonathan Potter. 2018. “Advice
Giving and Advice Resistance on Telephone Helplines.” In The Oxford
Handbook of Advice, ed. by Erina L. MacGeorge, and Lyn M. Van Swol. 191–215. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hepburn, Alexa, and Jonathan Potter. 2011. “Designing
the Recipient: Managing Advice Resistance in Institutional Settings.” Social Psychology
Quarterly 74(2): 216–241.
Hepburn, Alexa, Sue Wilkinson, and Carly W. Butler. 2014. “Intervening
with Conversation Analysis in Telephone Helpline Services: Strategies to Improve
Effectiveness.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 47(3): 239–254.
Heritage, John. 2012a. “Epistemics
in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 45(1): 1–29.
. 2012b. “The
Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and
Social
Interaction 45(1): 30–52.
. 2013a. “Action
Formation and Its Epistemic (and Other) Backgrounds.” Discourse
Studies 15(5): 551–578.
. 2013b. “Epistemics
in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation
Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 370–394. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
. 2018. “The
Ubiquity of Epistemics: A Rebuttal to the ‘Epistemics of Epistemics’ Group.” Discourse
Studies 20(1): 14–56.
Heritage, John, and Anna Lindström. 2012. “Advice
Giving – Terminable and Interminable: The Case of British Health
Visitors.” In Advice in Discourse, ed.
by Holger Limberg, and Miriam A. Locher, 169–193. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. “The
Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in
Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology
Quarterly 68(1): 15–38.
Heritage, John, and Sue Sefi. 1992. “Dilemmas
of Advice: Aspects of the Delivery and Reception of Advice in Interactions between Health Visitors and First-time
Mothers.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional
Settings, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 359–417. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hutchby, Ian. 1995. “Aspects
of Recipient Design in Expert Advice-giving on Call-in Radio.” Discourse
Processes 19(2): 219–238.
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “Glossary
of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation
Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Mikesell, Lisa, Galina B. Bolden, Jenny Mandelbaum, Jeffrey D. Robinson, Tanya Romaniuk, Alexa Bolaños-Carpio, Darcey Searles, Wan Wei, Stephen M. DiDomenico, and Beth Angell. 2017. “At
the Intersection of Epistemics and Action: Responding with I Know.” Research on Language and
Social
Interaction 50(3): 268–285.
Peng, Zhuo. 2020. “An
Epistemic Study on the Defense of Stance in Disagreements in Marital Problem
Phone-ins.” Foreign Languages and Their
Teaching (3): 92–106.
Pomerantz, Anita. 1986. “Extreme
Case Formulations: A way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human
Studies (2–3): 219–229.
Pudlinski, Christopher. 2002. “Accepting
and Rejecting Advice as Competent Peers: Caller Dilemmas on a Warm Line.” Discourse
Studies 4(4): 481–500.
. 2012. “The
Pursuit of Advice on US Peer Telephone Helplines: Sequential and Functional
Aspects.” In Advice in Discourse, ed.
by Holger Limberg, and Miriam A. Locher, 233–252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Raymond, Geoffrey, and John Heritage. 2006. “The
Epistemics of Social Relations: Owning Grandchildren.” Language in
Society 35(5): 677–705.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A
Primer in Conversation Analysis Volume
1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shaw, Chloe, and Alexa Hepburn. 2013. “Managing
the Moral Implications of Advice in Informal Interaction.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 46(4): 344–362.
Stevanovic, Melisa, and Jan Svennevig. 2015. “Introduction:
Epistemics and Deontics in Conversational Directives.” Journal of
Pragmatics 78(3): 1–6.
Stommel, Wyke, and Hedwig te Molder. 2018. “Empathically
Designed Responses as a Gateway to Advice in Dutch Counseling Calls.” Discourse
Studies 20(4): 523–543.
Waring, Hansun Zhang. 2005. “Peer Tutoring in a Graduate
Writing Centre: Identity, Expertise, and Advice Resisting.” Applied
Linguistics 26(2): 141–168.
Yu, Guodong, and Yaxin Wu. 2019. “Questioning
from the Perspective of Epistemics.” Foreign Language Learning Theory and
Practice (1): 39–47. [URL]
