Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 16:1 (2025) ► pp.113–144

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

The World of Daily Life

Doing a search for (e‑)shopping purposes

ORCiD logo with link | University of Southern Denmark
ORCiD logo with link | University of Southern Denmark
ORCiD logo with link | University of Southern Denmark
Published online: 13 February 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.22020.ras
Abstract
Within social scientific research searching for products is overwhelmingly reduced and represented as an activity that is embedded in decision-making processes. This study shows that searching is extremely multimodally rich and complex and that structured stages of searching are the product of customers’ efforts to order this complexity in and through concrete actions. Importantly, it also shows that customers carry out these actions un-hesitantly in both physical Brick-and Mortar (B&M) shops and in web-shops. The paper concludes that descriptions of searching need to take the nature of the multimodal environment as well as customers’ approach and engagement with it into consideration: searching for products is multimodally rich and complex and yet it is simple.
The study is situated within the broad fields of EMCA and Social Semiotics in multimodality. It is based on video-recordings and eye‑tracking recordings of customers’ buying practices in different kinds of (web)shops.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Research in Multimodality
  • 3.Research in searching
  • 4.Data collection and methods
  • 5.Analysis: The organization of searching
    • 5.1Creating paths and search areas
    • 5.2The emergence of organizing search principles
    • 5.3Examination of products
  • 6.Discussion and concluding remarks
  • Declaration of conflicting interests
  • Notes
  • References
References (58)
References
Adami, Elisabeth. 2014. “What’s in a click? A social semiotic framework for the multimodal analysis of website interactivity.” Visual Communication 14 (2): 133–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brucks, Merrie. 1985. “The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior.” Journal of Consumer Research 12 (1): 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Button, Graham. 1991. Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crabtree, Andy, David M. Nichols, Mark Rouncefield, and Michael B. Twidale. 2000. “The contribution of ethnomethodologycally-informed ethnography to the process of designing digital libraries.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (7): 666–682. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crabtree, Andy, Michael Twidale, Jon O’Brien, and David Nichols. 1997. “Talking in the Library: Implications for the Design of Digital Libraries.” Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference of Digital Libraries. Philadelphia: Association of Computing Machinery, 221–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crook, Charles. 2015. “The Field of Digital Technology Research.” In The SAGE Handbook of Digital Technology Research ed. by Sara Price, Carey Jewitt, and Barry Brown, 26–40. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Stefani, Elwys. 2013. “The collaborative organisation of next actions in a semiotically rich environment: Shopping as a couple.” In Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion ed. by Pentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 123–151. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Establishing joint orientation towards commercial objects in a self-service store.” In Interaction with Objects Language, materiality, and social activity, ed. by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, and Mika Rauniomaa, 271–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 2007 [1910]. How we think. New York: Cosimo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dourish, Paul, and Graham Button. 1998. “On ‘technomethodology’: Foundational relationships between ethnomethodology and system design.” Human-Computer Interaction 131: 395–432. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frohlich, David, Paul Drew, and A. Monk. 1994. “Management of repair in human-computer interaction.” Human-Computer Interaction, ACM Press 9 (4): 385–425. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1963. “A conception of, and experiments with, ‘trust’ as a condition of stable concerted actions.” In Motivation and social interaction, ed. by O. J. Harvey, 187–238. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Seeing Sociologically. The Routine Grounds of Social Action. Boulder, Colo.: Paradigm Press. [1948]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guo, Chiquan. 2001. “A Review on Consumer External Search: Amount and Determinants.” Journal of Business and Psychology 151: 505–519. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hazel, Spencer, Kristian Mortensen, and Gitte Rasmusen. 2014. “A Body of Resources: CA Studies in Social Conduct” Journal of Pragmatics. 651: 10–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heath, Christian, and Paul Luff. 2000. Technology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hepburn, Alexa, and Galina Bolden. 2012. “The Conversation Analytic Approach to Transcription”. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 57–76. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilbert, Richard A. 1990. “Ethnomethodology and the Micro-Macro Order.” American Sociological Review 55 (6): 794–808. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hodge, Robert, and Günther Kress. 1998. Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hong, Weiyin, James Y. L. Thong, and Kar Yan Tam. 2004. “Effects of Information Format and Shopping Task on Consumers’ Online Shopping Behavior: A Cognitive Fit Perspective.” Journal of Management Information Systems 21 (3): 149–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Housley, William, and Richard Fitzgerald. 2009. “Membership Categorization, Culture and Norms in Action.” Discourse & Society 20 (3): 345–362. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hua, Zhu, Emi Otsuji, and Alastair Pennycook. 2017. “Multilingual, Multisensory and Multimodal Repertoires in Corner Shops, Streets and Markets.” Social Semiotics 27 (4): 383–543. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jewitt, Carey. 2015. Multimodal Methods for Researching Digital Technologies. In The SAGE Handbook of Digital Technology Research, ed. by Sara Price, Carey Jewitt, and Barry Brouwn, 250–265. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin H., and Paul Drew. 2016. “Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 49 (1): 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kotler, Philip, Kevin L. Keller, and Alexander Chernev. 2009. Marketing Management. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice HallGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, Günther. 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, Günther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: the Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Elisabeth D. and Gitte Rasmussen. (2021). ‟Using Eye‑tracking Recordings as Data in EMCA Studies.” Social Interaction – Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality 4(4). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay L. 2002. ‟Travels in hypermodality.” Visual Communication 1(3): 299–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liberman, Kenneth. 2011. “The reflexive intelligibility of affairs: ethnomethodological perpectives on communicating sense.” Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 641: 73–99.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. More Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York and Albany: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loebbecke, Claudia. 2002. “Digital goods: An economic perspective.” In Encyclopedia of Information Systems, ed. by Hossein Bidgoli, 635–647. San Diego, Cal.: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas, and Steven Clayman. 1991. “The diversity of ethnomethodology.” Annual Review of Sociology 171: 385–418. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, Christian, Jürgen Streeck, and J. Scott Jordan. 2017. Intercorporeality – Emerging Socialities in Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2016. “Multimodal resources and the organization of social interaction” In Handbooks of Communication Science, ed. by Andrea Rocci, and Louis De Saussure, 328–350. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “The multimodal interactional organization of tasting: Practices of tasting cheese in gourmet shops.” Discourse Studies 20 (6): 743–769. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “Participants’ orientations to material and sensorial features of objects: looking, touching, smelling and tasting while requesting products in shops.” Gesprächsforschung 201: 461–494. [URL]
. 2022. “Appealing to the senses: Approaching, sensing, and interacting at the market’s stall.” Discourse & Communication 16 (2), 160–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moore, Robert J., Elisabeth F. Churchill, and Rai G. P. Kantamneni. 2011. “Three Sequential Positions of Query Repairiin Interactions with Internet Search Engines. CSCW’ 11 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Hangzhou, China: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norris, Sigrid. 2004. Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. New York and London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poulsen, Søren V. 2022. “The same but different: A social semiotic analysis of website interactivity as discourse.” Discourse & Communication 6 (2): 249–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rahman, Mohammad A., Aminul Islam, Bushra H. Esha, Nahida Sultana, and Sujan Chakravorty. 2018. “Consumer buying behavior towards online shopping: An empirical study on Dhaka city, Bangladesh.” Cogent Business & Management 51: 1514940. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Gitte, Spencer Hazel, and Kristian Mortensen. 2014. “A body of resources – CA studies in social conduct.” Journal of Pragmatics 651: 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Gitte, and Elisabeth D. Kristiansen. 2022. “The sociality of minimizing involvement in self-service shops in Denmark: Customers’ multi-modal practices of being, getting and staying out of the way.” Discourse & Communication 16 (2): 200–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Gitte, and Theo van Leeuwen (eds.). 2022. “The human touch – Analyzing online and offline shopping.” Discourse & Communication 16 (2), 149–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(eds.). 2024. Multimodality and Social Interaction in Online and Offline Shopping (1st ed.). London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rawls, Anne W. 2005. “Garfinkel’s Conception of Time.” Time & Society 14 (2–3): 163–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rowley, Jennifer. 2000. “Product search in e‑shopping: A review and research propositions.” Journal of Consumer Marketing 17 (1): 20–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 1996. “Confirming Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action.” American Journal of Sociology 102 (1): 161–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schutz, Alfred. 1962. “The Problem of Social Reality.” In Collected Papers, Vol 11, ed. by Maurice Natanson. The Hague, Boston and London: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shah, Caryn S., and Anindita Paul. 2020. “Information Seeking Behaviour in Online Shopping.” In Re‑imagining Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology and Systems: A Continuing Conversation, ed. by Sujeet K. Sharma, Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Bhimaraya Metri, and Nripendra P. Rana, 439–450. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen, Charles Goodwin, and Curtis D. LeBaron. 2011. Embodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Twidale, Michel B., Damon Chaplin, Andy Crabtree, David M. Nichols, Jon O’Brien, and Mark Rouncefield. 1997. Collaboration in Physical and Digital Libraries. British Library Research and Innovation Centre Report 64.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, Jan, and Kenneth Hacker. 2003. “The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon.” The Information Society 19 (4): 315–326. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zammit, Katine. 2007. The construction of student pathways during information-seeking sessions using hypermedia programs: A social semiotic perspective. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Western Sydney.
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Rasmussen, Gitte & Elisabeth Dalby Kristiansen
2025. The influence of the specificities of gaze behavior on emerging and ensuing interaction. In Mobile Eye Tracking [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 351], ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue