Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 15:2 (2024) ► pp.215–245

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

“I hope this is your last sorrow”

Condolence strategies in colloquial Persian

ORCiD logo with link | The University of Queensland
Published online: 6 April 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21084.she
Abstract
The objective of the present study is to examine condolence strategies and the sociocultural norms underlying the realisation of the speech act of condolence in Persian. To achieve this, a three-layered data collection methodology including two focus group interviews (FGIs), field notes, and a discourse completion task (DCT) were used. FGIs and field notes were utilised to shed light on the cultural norms as well as any variables affecting the expressions of condolence. The DCT, on the other hand, was administered to explicate the form and frequency of condolence strategies in Persian. Results indicate that, influenced by six sociocultural variables, 20 distinct condolence strategies are used in Persian. Furthermore, findings show that, while these strategies are used with varying degrees of frequency in different situations, when expressing condolence, Persian speakers place high importance on empathising with the bereaved interlocutor.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Prior studies
  • 3.Method and data collection
    • 3.1FGIs
    • 3.2Field notes
    • 3.3The DCT
  • 4.Analytic framework
  • 5.Description and analysis
    • 5.1Findings of the FGIs
    • 5.2Findings of the field notes
    • 5.3Strategy form and function
      • 5.3.1The involvement component
      • 5.3.2Empathy component
      • 5.3.3Respect component
  • 6.Discussion of the findings
    • 6.1Addressee’s age
    • 6.2Interlocutors’ sex
    • 6.3Addressee’s status
    • 6.4Solidarity between the interlocutors
    • 6.5Age of the deceased
    • 6.6Cause of death
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (67)
References
Afghari, Akbar. 2007. “A Sociopragmatic Study of Apology Speech Act Realization Patterns in Persian.” Speech Communication, 491: 177–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allan, Keith, Alessandro Capone, and Istvan Kecskes (eds.). 2016. Pragmemes and theories of language use. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Babai Shishavan, Homa, and Farzad Sharifian. 2013. “Refusal Strategies in L1 and L2: A Study of Persian-Speaking Learners of English.” Multilingua 32 (6): 801–836. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, and Elite Olshtain. 1984. “Requests and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP).” Applied Linguistics 51: 198–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper (eds.). 1989. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, James Dean. 2001. Using Surveys in Language Programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capone, Alessandro. 2005. “Pragmemes (a study with references to English and Italian).” Journal of Pragmatics 371: 1355–1371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “On pragmemes again: Dealing with Death.” La Linguistique 461: 3–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capone, A. (2016). The pragmatics of indirect reports: Socio-philosophical considerations. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Pragmatics Today: Theoretical, Applied, and Cross-linguistic Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carey, Martha Ann. 1994. “The Group Effect in Focus Groups: Planning, Implementing, and Interpreting Focus Group Research.” In: Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods, ed. by Janice M. Morse, 225–241. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, J., & Terkourafi, M. (2017). Pragmatic approaches (im)politeness. In J. Culpeper, M. Haugh, & D. Kádár (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness (pp. 11–39). Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delvecchio Good, Mary-Jo, and Byron J. Good. 1988. “Ritual, the State, and the Transformation of Emotional Discourse in Iranian Society.” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 12(1): 43–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dongu, Maria Grazia. 2017. “Gray’s ‘Elegy’: A Polyphonous Elegy Sung to the Silence of Death.” In The Pragmeme of Accommodation: The Case of Interaction around the Event of Death, ed. by Vahid Parvaresh and Alessandro Capone, 441–458. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Zoltán. 2007. Research methods in Applied linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elwood, Kate. 2004. “‘I’m So Sorry’: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Expressions of Condolence.” The Cultural Review, Waseda Commercial Studies Association (Bulletin of Universities and Institutes) 241: 101–126.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2006). Linguistic politeness in Mexico: Refusal strategies among male speakers of Mexican Spanish. Journal of pragmatics, 38(12), 2158–2187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García, Carmen. 2010. “‘Cuente Conmigo’: The Expression of Sympathy by Peruvian Spanish Speakers.” Journal of Pragmatics 42(2): 408–425. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, S. M., & Neu, J. (2006). The Discourse Completion Task. In K. Bardovi-Harlig & C. A. F. Chapelle (Eds.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 349–371). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: essays on face-to-face interaction. Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gray, Thomas. 1751. Elegy Wrote in a Country Church Yard. London: Dodsley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halcomb, Elizabeth J., Leila Gholizadeh, Michelle DiGiacomo, Jane Phillips, and Patricia M. Davidson. 2007. “Literature Review: Considerations in Undertaking Focus Group Research with Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Groups.” Journal of Clinical Nursing 16(6): 1000–1011. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hassall, Tim. 2003. “Requests by Australian Learners of Indonesian.” Journal of Pragmatics 35(12): 1903–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hedtke, Lorraine. 2002. “Reconstructing the language of death and grief.” Illness, Crisis & Loss 10(4): 285–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hendriks, Berna. 2008. “Dutch English Requests: A Study of Request Performance by Dutch Learners of English.” In Developing Contrastive Pragmatics: Interlanguage and Cross-Cultural Perspectives, ed. by Martin Pütz and JoAnne Neff-van Aertselaer, 335–354. Berlin and New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornberger, Nancy. 1994. “Ethnography.” TESOL Quarterly 28(4): 688–690.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hughes, Diane, and Kimberly DuMont. 1993. “Using Focus Groups to Facilitate Culturally Anchored Research.” American Journal of Community Psychology 21(6): 775–806. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Izadi, Ahmad. 2015. “Persian honorifics and im/politeness as social practice.” Journal of Pragmatics 851: 81–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Michael H. 2017. “‘The Bad Death’: Deciphering and Developing the Dominant Discourse on ‘The Good Death’”. In The Pragmeme of Accommodation: The Case of Interaction around the Event of Death, ed. by Vahid Parvaresh and Alessandro Capone, 351–373. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kecskes, I. (2010). Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 421, 2889–2897. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koutlaki, Sofia A. 2002. “Offers and expressions of thanks as face enhancing acts: tae’arof in Persian.” Journal of Pragmatics 34(12), 1733–1756. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kwon, Jihyun. 2004. “Expressing Refusals in Korean and in American English.” Multilingua 23(4): 339–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McLafferty, Isabella. 2004. “Focus Group Interviews as a Data Collecting Strategy.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 48(2): 187–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. “Pragmatic acts” In K. Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (online version). Oxford: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morris, D. B. (1993). The culture of pain. Berkeley. University of California Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nakajima, Keiko. 2002. The Key to Intercultural Communication: A Comparative Study of Speech Act Realization of Sympathy/empathy. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nureddeen, Fatima Abdurahman. 2008. “Cross Cultural Pragmatics: Apology Strategies in Sudanese Arabic.” Journal of Pragmatics 40(2): 279–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mills, S. (2017). Sociocultural approaches (im)politeness. In J. Culpeper, M. Haugh, & D. Kádár (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness (pp. 41–60). Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parvaresh, Vahid, and Amir Sheikhan. 2019. “Pragmatic functions of ‘sort of’ in Persian: A vague language perspective.” Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 29(1): 86–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parvaresh, Vahid, and Abbas Eslami Rasekh. 2009. “Speech Act Disagreement Among Young Women in Iran.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 11(4): 1–8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parvaresh, Vahid, and Alessandro Capone (eds.). 2017. “The Pragmeme of Accommodation: The Case of Interaction around the Event of Death.” Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy& Psychology 131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parvaresh, Vahid. 2017. “Panegyrists, vagueness and the pragmeme.” In The pragmeme of accommodation: The case of interaction around the event of death, ed. by Vahid Parvaresh and Alessandro Capone, 61–81, Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pennebaker, James W., Tracy J. Mayne, and Martha E. Francis. 1997. “Linguistic Predictors of Adaptive Bereavement.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72(4): 863–871. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pulaczewska, Hanna. 2013. “You Get What You Put in: Elicited Production Versus Spontaneous Verbal Interaction in Cross-Linguistic Studies of Language Use.” Intercultural Pragmatics 10(4): 647–678. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, Paul C. 2008. “Grief Across Cultures: A Review and Research Agenda.” In Handbook of Bereavement Research and Practice: Advances in Theory and Intervention, 207–222. Washington: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sasaki, Miyuki. 1998. “Investigating EFL Students’ Production of Speech Acts: A Comparison of Production Questionnaires and Role Plays.” Journal of Pragmatics 30(4): 457–484. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1994. Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scollon, Christie N., Ed Diener, Shigehiro Oishi, and Robert Biswas-Diener. 2004. “Emotions Across Cultures and Methods.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 35(3): 304–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sheikhan, Amir, and Michael Haugh. 2022. “Non-serious answers to (improper) questions in talk shows.” Journal of Pragmatics 1911: 32–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sheikhan, Amir. 2017. “Rapport management toward expressing sympathy in Persian.” Linguistik online 83(4). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000). Rapport management: A framework for analysis. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures (pp. 11–46). London: Continuum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2002. “Managing rapport in talk. Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations”. Journal of Pragmatics 34(5): 529–545. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “(Im)politeness, Face and Perceptions of Rapport: Unpacking Their Bases and Interrelationships.” Journal of Politeness Research 1(1): 95–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stewart, David W., Prem N. Shamdasani, and Dennis W. Rook. 2006. Focus Groups. Los Angeles, Cal.: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter F. 1964. “Intention and convention in speech acts.” The Philosophical Review 73(4): 439–460. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, Dario. 2017. “The Fragile Nature of Human Glory: Death and Poetry in Thomas Gray’s Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard.” In The Pragmeme of Accommodation: The Case of Interaction around the Event of Death, ed. by Vahid Parvaresh and Alessandro Capone, 459–462. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Varga, Mary Alice. 2017. “Grief interactions among emerging adults on college campuses.” In The Pragmeme of Accommodation: The Case of Interaction around the Event of Death, ed. by Vahid Parvaresh and Alessandro Capone, 83–94, Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wakefield, John C., and Hiroko Itakura. 2017. “English vs. Japanese Condolences: What People Say and Why.” In The pragmeme of accommodation: The case of interaction around the event of death, ed. by Vahid Parvaresh and Alessandro Capone, 203–231. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, Ming-chung. 2003. “On the Universality of Face: Evidence from Chinese Compliment Response Behavior.” Journal of Pragmatics 35(10): 1679–1710. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yuan, Yi. 2001. “An Inquiry into Empirical Pragmatics Data-Gathering Methods: Written DCTs, Oral DCTs, Field Notes, and Natural Conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics 33(2): 271–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zammuner, Vanda L., and Nico H. Frijda. 1994. “Felt and Communicated Emotions: Sadness and Jealousy.” Cognition and Emotion 8(1): 37–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue