Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 14:6 (2023) ► pp.844–868

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Self-help and masculinity

Speech acts in an online men’s group

ORCiD logo with link | Birmingham City University
Published online: 11 April 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21075.kre
Abstract
This study investigates the interactional norms of a manosphere discussion forum known as The Red Pill (TRP), and asks whether it can be conceptualised as a self-help group. 2104 posts and comments from regular users and high-status users in the community were analysed qualitatively to determine how the community is characterised by certain speech acts, and how these speech acts correspond to face-enhancement and face-threat as well as to certain impression management strategies.
Since personal disclosure, advice-giving, and face-enhancement are key characteristics of TRP, it could be argued that TRP shares some functional characteristics with self-help communities. However, much of the advice given is unsolicited, a disproportionately high rate of face-enhancement is directed towards high-status users, and speech acts such as elaborating, and some advice-giving and personal disclosure seem to be used for self-promotion purposes. Furthermore, the prevalence of unhedged face-threats sets TRP apart from traditional supportive communities.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Men, self-help, and self-disclosure
    • 2.1TRP
  • 3.Data selection, collection and preparation
  • 4.Methodology
  • 5.Results and discussion
    • 5.1Face-enhancing and face-threatening speech acts
    • 5.2Other speech acts
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (35)
References
Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altman, Irwin and Dalmas Taylor. 1973. Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowman-Grieve, Lorraine. 2009. “Exploring “Stormfront”: A Virtual Community of the Radical Right.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 32(11): 989–1007. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 2003. Men Talk: Stories in the Making of Masculinities. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dayter, Daria, and Sofia Rüdiger. 2016. “Reporting from the Field: the Narrative Reconstruction of Experience in Pick-Up Artist Online Communities.” Open Linguistics 2(1): 337–351. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dishy, Aaron. 2018. “Swallowing Misandry: A Survey of the Discursive Strategies of r/TheRedPill on Reddit.” MA diss., Toronto University.
Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1992. “Think Practically and Look Locally: Language and Gender as Community-Based Practice.” Annual Review of Anthropology 21(1): 461–490. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
franzke, aline shakti, Anja Bechmann, Michael Zimmer, Charles Ess, and the Association of Internet Researchers. 2020. Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. Available at [URL]
Flynn, Mark, and Alexandru Stana. 2012. “Social Support in a Men’s Online Eating Disorder Forum.” International Journal of Men’s Health 11(2): 150–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gough, Brendan. 2016. “Men’s Depression Talk Online: a Qualitative Analysis of Accountability and Authenticity in Help Seeking and Support Formulations.” Psychology of Men & Masculinity 17(1): 156–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanna, Esmée, and Brendan Gough. 2018. “Searching for Help Online: an Analysis of Peer-to-Peer Posts on a Male-Only Infertility Forum.” Journal of Health Psychology 23(7): 917–928. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hendriks, Eric. 2012. “Ascetic Hedonism: Self and Sexual Conquest in the Seduction Community.” Cultural Analysis 11(1): 1–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1988. “Paying Compliments: a Sex-Preferential Politeness Strategy.” Journal of Pragmatics 12(1): 445–465. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Edward, and Thane Pittman. 1982. “Towards a General Theory of Strategic Self-Presentation.” In Psychological Perspectives on the Self, ed. by Jerry M. Suls, 2321–2362). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krendel, Alexandra. 2020. The men and women, guys and girls of the ‘manosphere’: A corpus-assisted discourse approach. Discourse & Society 31(6): 607–630. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lave, Jean, and Étienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lawson, Robert, and Mark McGlashan. 2017. “You Need to Become Prime Dick”: a Corpus-Based Analysis of Self-Help Discourses and Gender Constructions in Online Seduction Communities. 116th annual American Anthropological Association meeting, Washington D.C, 30th November 2017.
Locher, Miriam, and Richard Watts. 2005. “Politeness Theory and Relational Work.” Journal of Politeness Research 1(1): 9–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marwick, Alice and Robyn Caplan. 2018. “Drinking Male Tears: Language, the Manosphere, and Networked Harassment.” Feminist Media Studies 18(4): 543–559. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McLean, Scott, and Laurie Vermeylen. 2019. “From Getting Ahead to Getting Back on One’s Feet: Performing Masculinity as a Self-Help Reader.” Men and Masculinities 22(4): 716–737. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mountford, JB. 2018. “Topic Modeling the Red Pill.” Social Sciences 7(3): 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Brien, Rosaleen, Kate Hunt, and Graham Hart. 2005. “‘It’s Caveman Stuff, but That is to a Certain Extent How Guys Still Operate’: Men’s Accounts of Masculinity and Help-Seeking.” Social Science and Medicine 61(3): 503–516. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Neill, Rachel. 2016. “Homosociality and Heterosex: Patterns of Intimacy and Relationality among Men in the London ‘Seduction Community’.” In A. Cornwall, F. G. Karioris & N. Lindisfarne (Eds.), Masculinities Under Neoliberalism. (pp.261–276). London: Zed Books. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rüdiger, Sofia, and Daria Dayter. 2020. “Manbragging Online: Self-Praise on Pick-Up Artists’ Forums.” Journal of Pragmatics 161(1): 16–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1976. “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society 5(1): 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1990. You Just Don’t Understand: Men and Women in Conversation. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trosborg, Anna. 1995. Interlanguage Pragmatics. Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Valkenburgh, Shaun. 2021. “Digesting the Red Pill: Masculinity and Neoliberalism in the Manosphere.” Men and Masculinities 24(1): 84–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wenger, Étienne. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, Scott, Verity Trott, and Callum Jones. 2020. “‘The Pussy Ain’t Worth it, Bro’: Assessing the Structure and Discourse of MGTOW.” Information, Communication & Society 23(6): 908–925. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Colacel, Onoriu
2025. Discourses of New Masculinity in the Romanian Manosphere: Theological and Anglophone Scripts. The Journal of Men’s Studies DOI logo
Iñigo, Anna
2025. Navigating the Manosphere: A Scoping Review of Research on Masculinist and Misogynist Online Spaces. The Journal of Men’s Studies DOI logo
Jegede, Olusegun Oladele
2025. Discursive practices in the manosphere: an analysis of the language of victimhood and blame in Men’s Rights Activism (MRA). Lodz Papers in Pragmatics DOI logo
Krendel, Alexandra
2025. The Language of Profeminist Men Online: A Corpus Linguistic Analysis. Gender and Language 19:2 ► pp. 158 ff. DOI logo
O'Toole, Olga
2024. (Im)politeness as a Strategy in the Discursive Construction of In-Group Solidarity in Discussions about Love, Sex and Relationships on Incels.is. Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium 9:1 ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue