Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 15:3 (2024) ► pp.471–494
Blame-avoiding strategies for a digital scandal
A critical discourse analysis of Mark Zuckerberg’s Congressional hearings
Published online: 30 May 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21063.liu
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21063.liu
Abstract
The burgeoning digital economy has also aroused wide public concerns over its improper use of personal data for
economic and political profits. This study focuses on the milestone Facebook-Cambridge Analytica scandal and examines how Mark
Zuckerberg succeeded in avoiding public blame during two US Congressional hearings. An integrated analytic framework has been
established by combining blame theory and critical discourse analysis to examine blame-avoiding strategies used by Mark Zuckerberg
during the two Congressional hearings. The findings have revealed not only the topics but also the specific strategies and the
linguistic means and realizations for these strategies. It is expected that this study can generate significant implications on
blame-avoiding strategies by digital corporations for their inherently flawed business models.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Previous studies on blaming and blame-avoiding discourses
- 3.Towards an integrated analytic framework
- 4.Methodology
- 5.Findings
- 5.1Analysis of macro-strategies
- 5.2Analysis of micro-strategies
- 5.2.1Facebook
- 5.2.2“Cambridge analytica”
- 6.Conclusion
References
References (52)
Benoit, William L., Paul Gullifor, and Daniel A. Panici. 1991. “President
Reagan’s defensive discourse on the Iran-Contra affair.” Communication
Studies 42 (3): 272–294.
Boatwright, Brandon Carl, and Candace White. 2020. “Is
privacy dead? Does it matter?” The Journal of Public Interest
Communications 4 (1): 78–78.
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical
Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London and New York: Longman.
Hansson, Sten. 2015a. “Calculated
overcommunication: Strategic uses of prolixity, irrelevance, and repetition in administrative
language.” Journal of
Pragmatics 841: 172–188.
. 2015b. “Discursive
strategies of blame avoidance in government: A framework for analysis.” Discourse &
Society 26(3): 297–322.
. 2017. “Anticipative
strategies of blame avoidance in government: The case of communication guidelines.” Journal of
Language and
Politics 16(2): 219–241.
. 2018a. “Analysing
opposition-government blame games: Argument models and strategic maneuvering.” Critical
Discourse
Studies 15(3): 228–246.
. 2018b. “Defensive
semiotic strategies in government: A multimodal study of blame avoidance.” Social
Semiotics 28(4): 472–493.
Hart, Christopher. 2018. “Event-frames
affect blame assignment and perception of aggression in discourse on political protests: An experimental case study in
critical discourse analysis.” Applied
Linguistics 39(3): 400–421.
Hering, Martin. 2008. “Welfare
state restructuring without grand coalitions: The role of informal cooperation in blame
avoidance.” German
Politics 17(2): 165–183.
Hinds, Joanne, Emma J. Williams, and Adam N. Joinson. 2020. “‛It
wouldn’t happen to me’: Privacy concerns and perspectives following the Cambridge Analytica
scandal.” International Journal of Human-Computer
Studies 1431: 102498.
Hinterleitner, Markus. 2017. ”Reconciling
perspectives on blame avoidance behaviour.” Political Studies
Review 15 (2): 243–254.
Hobolt, Sara B., and James Tilley. 2014. Blaming
Europe?: Responsibility without Accountability in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hood, Christopher. 2002. ”The
risk game and the blame game.” Government and
Opposition 37 (1): 15–37.
. 2010. The
Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-preservation in
Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
. 2014. ”Accountability
and blame–avoidance.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public
Accountability, edited by Mark Bovens, Robert E. Goodin and Thomas Schillemans, 603–616. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hood, Christopher, Will Jennings, and Paul Copeland. 2016. ”Blame
avoidance in comparative perspective: Reactivity, staged retreat and efficacy.” Public
Administration 94 (2): 542–562.
Howlett, Michael. 2012. ”The
lessons of failure: Learning and blame avoidance in public policy-making.” International
Political Science
Review 33 (5): 539–555.
Isaak, Jim, and Mina J. Hanna. 2018. ”User
data privacy: Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and privacy
protection.” Computer 51 (8): 56–59.
Kabachnik, Peter, Joanna Regulska, and Beth Mitchneck. 2012. ”Displacing
blame: Georgian internally displaced person perspectives of the Georgia-Abkhazia
conflict.” Ethnopolitics 11 (2): 123–140.
Kozlowska, Iga. 2018. ”Facebook
and data privacy in the age of Cambridge Analytica.” Available online
at: [URL]. Accessed
on 15 May 2021.
Leong, Ching, and Michael Howlett. 2017. ”On
credit and blame: Disentangling the motivations of public policy decision-making
behaviour.” Policy
Sciences 50 (4): 599–618.
McIntosh, Janet, and Norma Mendoza-Denton. 2020. Language
in the Trump era: Scandals and
emergencies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meredith, Sam. 2018. ”Facebook-Cambridge
Analytica: A timeline of the data hijacking scandal”. CNBC. Available
online at: [URL]. Accessed
on 12 March 2021.
Shapiro, Michael J. 1990. ”Strategic discourse/discursive
strategy: The representation of “security policy” in the video age.” International Studies
Quarterly 34 (3): 327–340.
Solomona, R. Patrick, John P. Portelli, Beverley-Jean Daniel, and Arlene Campbell. 2005. ”The
discourse of denial: How white teacher candidates construct race, racism and ‛white
privilege’.” Race Ethnicity and
Education 8(2): 147–169.
Sulitzeanu-Kenan, Raanan, and Christopher Hood. 2005. “Blame avoidance with adjectives? Motivation, opportunity, activity and outcome.” Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, Blame Avoidance and Blame Management Workshop, Granada, Spain, 14–20 April.
1997. ”Political discourse and racism:
Describing others in western parliaments.” The Language and Politics of Exclusion: Others in
Discourse 21: 31–64.
2003. ”Critical discourse
analysis.” In The Handbook of Discourse
Analysis, edited by D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen and H. E. Hamilton, 352–371. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
2013. ”Discourse, power and
access.” In Texts and Practices, edited
by C. R. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard, 93–113. London: Routledge.
. 2008. Discourse
and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse
Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak. 1999. ”Legitimizing
immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis.” Discourse
Studies 1 (1): 83–118.
Vis, Barbara. 2016. ”Taking
stock of the comparative literature on the role of blame avoidance strategies in social policy
reform.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and
Practice 18 (2): 122–137.
Wenzelburger, Georg, and Felix Hörisch. 2016. ”Framing
effects and comparative social policy reform: Comparing blame avoidance evidence from two
experiments.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and
Practice 18 (2): 157–175.
Whittle, Andrea, and Frank Mueller. 2016. ”Accounting
for the banking crisis: Repertoires of agency and structure.” Critical Discourse
Studies 13 (1): 20–40.
Wodak, Ruth. 1999. ”Critical
discourse analysis at the end of the 20th century.” Research on Language & Social
Interaction 32 (1–2): 185–193. .
. 2001. ”The
discourse-historical approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse
Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 63–94. London: Sage.
. 2006. ”Blaming
and denying: Pragmatics.” In Encyclopedia of Language &
Linguistics, edited by Keith Brown, 59–64. Oxford: Elsevier.
. 2016. ”The
discourse-historical approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse
Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 23–61. London: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer, eds. 2009. Methods
of Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd
ed. London: Sage.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Liu, Ming & Jinge Li
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
