Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 15:3 (2024) ► pp.471494

References (52)
References
Benoit, William L., Paul Gullifor, and Daniel A. Panici. 1991. “President Reagan’s defensive discourse on the Iran-Contra affair.” Communication Studies 42 (3): 272–294. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boatwright, Brandon Carl, and Candace White. 2020. “Is privacy dead? Does it matter?The Journal of Public Interest Communications 4 (1): 78–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd ed. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansson, Sten. 2015a. “Calculated overcommunication: Strategic uses of prolixity, irrelevance, and repetition in administrative language.” Journal of Pragmatics 841: 172–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. “Discursive strategies of blame avoidance in government: A framework for analysis.” Discourse & Society 26(3): 297–322. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018a. “Analysing opposition-government blame games: Argument models and strategic maneuvering.” Critical Discourse Studies 15(3): 228–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018b. “Defensive semiotic strategies in government: A multimodal study of blame avoidance.” Social Semiotics 28(4): 472–493. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2018. “Event-frames affect blame assignment and perception of aggression in discourse on political protests: An experimental case study in critical discourse analysis.” Applied Linguistics 39(3): 400–421.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hering, Martin. 2008. “Welfare state restructuring without grand coalitions: The role of informal cooperation in blame avoidance.” German Politics 17(2): 165–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinds, Joanne, Emma J. Williams, and Adam N. Joinson. 2020. “‛It wouldn’t happen to me’: Privacy concerns and perspectives following the Cambridge Analytica scandal.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 1431: 102498. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinterleitner, Markus. 2017. ”Reconciling perspectives on blame avoidance behaviour.” Political Studies Review 15 (2): 243–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B., and James Tilley. 2014. Blaming Europe?: Responsibility without Accountability in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hood, Christopher. 2002. ”The risk game and the blame game.” Government and Opposition 37 (1): 15–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-preservation in Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. ”Accountability and blame–avoidance.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability, edited by Mark Bovens, Robert E. Goodin and Thomas Schillemans, 603–616. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hood, Christopher, Will Jennings, and Paul Copeland. 2016. ”Blame avoidance in comparative perspective: Reactivity, staged retreat and efficacy.” Public Administration 94 (2): 542–562. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael. 2012. ”The lessons of failure: Learning and blame avoidance in public policy-making.” International Political Science Review 33 (5): 539–555. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Isaak, Jim, and Mina J. Hanna. 2018. ”User data privacy: Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and privacy protection.” Computer 51 (8): 56–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kabachnik, Peter, Joanna Regulska, and Beth Mitchneck. 2012. ”Displacing blame: Georgian internally displaced person perspectives of the Georgia-Abkhazia conflict.” Ethnopolitics 11 (2): 123–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kozlowska, Iga. 2018. ”Facebook and data privacy in the age of Cambridge Analytica.” Available online at: [URL]. Accessed on 15 May 2021.
Leong, Ching, and Michael Howlett. 2017. ”On credit and blame: Disentangling the motivations of public policy decision-making behaviour.” Policy Sciences 50 (4): 599–618. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McIntosh, Janet, and Norma Mendoza-Denton. 2020. Language in the Trump era: Scandals and emergencies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meredith, Sam. 2018. ”Facebook-Cambridge Analytica: A timeline of the data hijacking scandal”. CNBC. Available online at: [URL]. Accessed on 12 March 2021.
Shapiro, Michael J. 1990. ”Strategic discourse/discursive strategy: The representation of “security policy” in the video age.” International Studies Quarterly 34 (3): 327–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Solomona, R. Patrick, John P. Portelli, Beverley-Jean Daniel, and Arlene Campbell. 2005. ”The discourse of denial: How white teacher candidates construct race, racism and ‛white privilege’.” Race Ethnicity and Education 8(2): 147–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sulitzeanu-Kenan, Raanan, and Christopher Hood. 2005. “Blame avoidance with adjectives? Motivation, opportunity, activity and outcome.” Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, Blame Avoidance and Blame Management Workshop, Granada, Spain, 14–20 April.
van Dijk, Teun A. 1992. ”Discourse and the denial of racism.” Discourse & Society 3 (1): 87–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1995. ”Aims of critical discourse analysis.” Japanese Discourse 1 (1): 17–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. ”Political discourse and racism: Describing others in western parliaments.” The Language and Politics of Exclusion: Others in Discourse 21: 31–64.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. ”Critical discourse analysis.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited by D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen and H. E. Hamilton, 352–371. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. ”Discourse, power and access.” In Texts and Practices, edited by C. R. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard, 93–113. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1993. ”Principles of critical discourse analysis.” Discourse & society 4 (2): 249–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 1995. ”Representing social action.” Discourse & Society 6 (1): 81–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak. 1999. ”Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis.” Discourse Studies 1 (1): 83–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vis, Barbara. 2016. ”Taking stock of the comparative literature on the role of blame avoidance strategies in social policy reform.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 18 (2): 122–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent. 1986. ”The politics of blame avoidance.” Journal of Public Policy 6 (4): 371–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wenzelburger, Georg, and Felix Hörisch. 2016. ”Framing effects and comparative social policy reform: Comparing blame avoidance evidence from two experiments.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 18 (2): 157–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whittle, Andrea, and Frank Mueller. 2016. ”Accounting for the banking crisis: Repertoires of agency and structure.” Critical Discourse Studies 13 (1): 20–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winder, Davey. 2019. Data breaches expose 4.1 billion records in first six months of 2019. Forbes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 1999. ”Critical discourse analysis at the end of the 20th century.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 32 (1–2): 185–193. . Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. ”The discourse-historical approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 63–94. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. ”Blaming and denying: Pragmatics.” In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, edited by Keith Brown, 59–64. Oxford: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. The Politics of Fear: What Right-wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. ”The discourse-historical approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 23–61. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. The Politics of Fear: The Shameless Normalization of Far-right Discourse. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Norman Fairclough. 2013. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer, eds. 2009. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016a. ”Critical discourse studies: History, agenda, theory and methodology.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 1–22. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, eds. 2016b. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Liu, Ming & Jinge Li
2025. When science communication meets politics: A corpus-assisted discourse study of the Congressional hearing on TikTok. Discourse & Society DOI logo
Takas, Emmanouil
2025. ‘We are the shield of the West’: image restoration, social representations, and identity entrepreneurship in Benjamin Netanyahu’s UN speech. Communication Research and Practice 11:2  pp. 251 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue