Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 15:3 (2024) ► pp.376–399

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

A contrastive study of Chinese and American online complaints

Speech act construction in relation to face management

 | University of International Business and Economics
Published online: 18 April 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21059.wei
Abstract
Speech acts in CMC (Computer Mediated Communication) have been receiving increasing attention in recent years. This study attempted to make a cross-cultural comparison of Chinese and American online complaints of restaurants from the perspective of speech act structure in relation to face management. In spite of likeness in the general taxonomy of retrospective and prospective speech acts between the two corpora, addressivity appeared to be a strong factor affecting how face was managed in the specific construction of complaints as speech act sets in the Chinese data set, while such a discrepancy was absent from the American reviews where the face of restaurants and fellow consumers was not handled with much distinction and discretion. These findings in terms of the level of sensitivity and adaptation to the context seem to imply that the generally-recognized distinction of high-context vs. low-context between the two cultures is also manifested in online reviews.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Complaint as speech act set
    • 2.2Complaint and face
    • 2.3Online complaint discourse
    • 2.4Complaint and culture
  • 3.This study
  • 4.Method
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Retrospective speech acts
      • 5.1.1Criticism
      • 5.1.2Accusation
      • 5.1.3Expectation
      • 5.1.4Compliment
      • 5.1.5Expressive
      • 5.1.6Compliment
      • 5.1.7Rating
    • 5.2Prospective speech acts
      • 5.2.1Reviewer-oriented
      • 5.2.2Consumer-oriented
      • 5.2.3Restaurants-oriented
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusions
  • References
References (47)
References
Anzilotti, Gloria. 1982. “The rhetorical question as an indirect speech device in English and Italian.” Canadian Modern Language Review 381: 290–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cenni, Irene, and Patrick Goethals. 2017. “Negative hotel reviews on TripAdvisor: A cross-linguistic analysis.” Discourse, Context & Media 161: 22–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Copeland, Lennie, and Lewis Griggs. 1986. Going international. New York, N.Y.: Random House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, Yuh-Fang, Ren Wei. 2020. “Sociopragmatic competence in American and Chinese children’s realization of apology and refusal.” Journal of Pragmatics 1641: 27–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Decock, Sofie, and Ilse Depraetere. 2018. “(In)directness and complaints: A reassessment.” Journal of Pragmatics 1321: 33–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Customer complaints and disagreements in a multilingual business: A discursive and pragmatic Analysis.” Intercultural Pragmatics 14(1): 77–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse, Sofie Decock, and Nicolas Ruytenbeek. 2021. “Linguistic (in)directness in twitter complaints: A contrastive analysis of railway complaint interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics 1711: 215–233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. 1998. “Complaints about transgressions and misconduct.” Research on language and social Interaction 31(3): 295–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du, Jinwei. 1995. “Performance of face-threatening acts in Chinese: Complaining, giving bad news and disagreeing.” In Pragmatics of Chinese as native and target language, ed. by Gabriele Kasper, 165–206. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne, and Diana Slade. 1997. Analyzing causal conversation. London: EquinoxGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emerson, Robert, and Sheldon Messinger. 1977. The micro-politics of trouble. Social Problem 251: 121–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eisenlauer, Volker. 2013. “A critical hypertext analysis of social media – The true colours of Facebook.” London and New York, N.Y.: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frank, Jane. 1990. “You call that a rhetorical question? Forms and functions of rhetorical questions in conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 14(5): 723–738. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frobenius, Maximiliane, Volker Eisenlauer, and Cornelia Gerhardt. 2014. “Participation framework revisited: (new) media and their audiences/users.” Journal of Pragmatics 721: 1–4. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2015. “Setting the linguistics research agenda for the e-service encounters genre: natively digital versus digitized perspectives.” In A Multidisciplinary Approach to Service Encounters, ed. by María de la O. Hernández-López and Lucía Fernández-Amaya, 13–36. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardaker, Claire, and Mark McGlashan. 2016. “‛Real men don’t hate women’: Twitter rape threats and group identity.” Journal of Pragmatics 911: 80–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heinemann, Trine, and Véronique Traverso. 2009. “Complaining in interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 121: 2381–2384. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten, Kevin Gwinner, Gianfranco Walsh, and Dwayne Gremler. 2004. “Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet?” Journal of Interactive Marketing 18(1): 38–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
House, Juliane, and Gabriele Kasper. 1981. “Politeness markers in English and German.” In Conversational Routine, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 157–185. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 1994. What else can I tell you? A pragmatic study of English rhetorical questions as discourse and argumentative acts. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International. (Stockholm Studies in English 72)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li Ping, Zheng Shutang, and Yang Xiaohu. 2006. “Factors affecting the degrees of severity in the realization of the speech act of complaint.” Foreign language teaching and research 38(1): 56–61.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Markus, Hazel, and Shinobu Kitayama. 1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review 981, 224–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marley, Carol. 2002. “Popping the question: Questions and modality in written dating advertisements.” Discourse Studies 4(1): 75–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meinl, Marja. 2014. Electronic complaints: An empirical study on British English and German complaints on eBay. Berlin: Frank & Timme.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marquez-Reiter, Rosina. 2005. “Complaint Calls to a Caregiver Company: The case of desahogo.” Intercultural Pragmatics 2(4): 281–513.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Monzoni, Chiara. 2009. “Direct complaints in (Italian) calls to the ambulance: The use of negatively framed questions.” Journal of Pragmatics 411: 2465–2478. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mulamba, Kashama. 2009. “Social beliefs for the realization of the speech acts of apology and complaint as defined in Ciluba, French and English.” Pragmatics 191: 543–564.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, Beth, and Joyce Neu. 1996. “My grade’s too low: the speech act set of complaining.” In Speech acts across cultures, ed. by Susan M. Gass and Joyce Neu, 191–216. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olshtain, Elite, and Liora Weinbach. 1987. “Complaints: A study of speech act behavior among native and nonnative speakers of Hebrew.” In The pragmatic perspective: Selected papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference, ed. by Jef Verschueren and Marcella Bertuccelli Papi, 195–208. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. Interlanguage features of the speech act of complaining. In Interlanguage pragmatics, ed. by Gabriele Kasper and Shoshana Blum-Kulka, 108–137. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rasekh, Zoreh Eslami. 2004. Face-keeping strategies in reaction to complaints: English and Persian. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 14(1): 181–197.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ren, Wei. 2018. Mitigation in Chinese online consumer reviews. Discourse, Context & Media 261: 5–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruytenbeek, Nicolas, Marie Verschraegen, and Sofie Decock. 2021. “Exploring the impact of platforms’ affordances on the expression of negativity in online hotel reviews.“ Journal of Pragmatics 1861: 289–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tatsuki, Donna. 2000. “If my complaints could passions move: An interlanguage study of aggression.” Journal of Pragmatics 32(7): 1003–1017. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin, and Kristine Mroczek. 2011. Digital discourse: Language in the new media. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trosborg, Anna. 1995. Interlanguage pragmatics. Requests, complaints and apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Herck, Rebecca, Sofie Decock, and Bernard De Clerck. 2020. “‘Can you send us a PM please?’ Service recovery interactions on social media from the perspective of organizational legitimacy.” Discourse, Context & Media 381, 100445. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vásquez, Camilla. 2011. “Complaints online: The case of TripAdvisor.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 4307–4317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vladimirou, Dimitra, Juliane House, and Daniel Kadar. 2021. “Aggressive complaining on Social Media: The case of #MuckyMerton.” Journal of Pragmatics 1771: 51–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Xiaolei, Ronan Bernas, and Philippe Eberhard. 2011. “When a Lie Is Not a Lie: Understanding Chinese Working-Class Mothers’ Moral Teaching and Moral Conduct.” Social Development 21(1): 68–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Jinjun. 2006. Questions and the exercise of power. Discourse & Society 17(4): 529–548. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Jinni, and Li Lin. 2015. “Comparative Study on Online Shopping Complaints and the Directness and Severity Levels of Complaint Response Realizations in China and America.” Journal of Guiyang University 10(3): 88–91.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, De. 2001. The speech act of complaining: a cross-cultural comparative study of Chinese and American English speakers. Thesis, Iowa State University.
Zhang, Huifang, and Gu Xinyu. 2013. “A Comparative Study of Expression of dissatisfaction between the Chinese and Japanese: The case on online negative evaluation.” Journal of Xi’an International Studies University 21(4): 41–44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhu, Xiaoshu. 2008. “Comparison of complaints between Chinese and American students.” Journal of Xi’an International Studies University 16(1): 51–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Tanju Deveci
2025. Teachers’ responses to students’ homework complaints in e-mailcommunication: A cross-cultural perspective. Russian Journal of Linguistics 29:2 ► pp. 339 ff. DOI logo
Zhu, Weihua
2025. Complaints in Travel Reality Shows: A Comparison Between Korean and Chinese Speakers. Languages 10:7 ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue