Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 14:6 (2023) ► pp.883–907
The role of assessments in providing evasive answers in news interviews
Published online: 11 April 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21056.alr
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21056.alr
Abstract
This paper examines the role of assessments in the design of interviewees’ answers in news interviews settings on
two Arabic networks. It employs a Conversation Analysis approach, in addition to quantitative analysis, to observe the most
recurrent positions for emerging assessments in interviewees’ answers. In addition, it examines the role of these assessments in
providing evasive answers to interviewers’ questions. The data consists of twenty-eight hours of recorded Arab news interviews
from four shows: Liqāʾ Xāṣ (Special Interview) and Bilā Ḥudūd (Without Bounds) on Aljazeera and
Nuqṭat Niḏ̣ām (Point of Order) and Muqābalah Xāṣah (Special Interview) on Al-Arabiya. The
findings reveal that assessments emerge in recurrent positions in interviewees’ answers and play a role in their design. Likewise,
they show the role of assessments in the design of evasive answers.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Assessments
- 3.Assessments in interviewees’ answers
- 4.Data and method
- 5.Results and discussion
- 5.1Assessments in turn-beginnings
- 5.1.1Assessments that address interviewers’ displayed assessments
- 5.1.2Displayed assessments to address the accuracy of questions propositions
- 5.1.3Assessments that introduce new assessables
- 5.2Assessments in interviewees’ turn-endings
- 5.1Assessments in turn-beginnings
- 6.Conclusion
References
References (35)
Abdullah, Saeed and Mokhtar Elareshi. 2015. “Building
narratives: A study of terrorism framing by Al Jazeera and Al Arabiya TV networks”. Arab Media
& Society 211: 1–14.
Alroumi, Abdulrahman and El Mustapha Lahlali. 2022. “The
accountability of assessments in news interviews”. Discourse &
Communication 15(6): 3–20.
Bednarek, Monika. 2009. “Dimensions
of evaluation: Cognitive and linguistic perspectives”. Pragmatics and
Cognition 7(1): 146–175.
Carranza, Ariel. 2016. “Evading
and resisting answering”. Pragmatics and
Society 7(4): 570–594.
Chovanec, Jan. 2020. “‛Those
are not my words’: Evasion and metalingual accountability in political scandal talk.” Journal
of Pragmatics 1581: 66–79.
. 2012. “Conversation
nalysis in the news interview.” In The Handbook of Conversation
Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 630–656. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
. 2017. “The
micropolitics of legitimacy: Political positioning and journalistic scrutiny at the boundary of the
mainstream”. Social Psychology
Quarterly 80(1): 41–64.
Clayman, Steven and John Heritage. 2002. The
news interview: Journalists and public figures on the
air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Edwards, Derek and Jonathan Potter. 2012. Descriptions
and Assessments [paper presentation]. Conference on
Discourse-Communication-Conversation, Loughborough, United
Kingdom, March 20–22 2012.
Ekström, Mats, Monika Djerf-Pierre, Bengt Johansson, and Nicklas Håkansson. 2016. “Negotiating
politicians’ responsibilities in news interviews”. Journalism
Practice 10(8): 983–1004.
Emmertsen, Sofie. 2007. “Interviewers’
challenging questions in British debate interviews”. Journal of
Pragmatics 39(3): 570–591.
Englebretson, Robert. 2007. Stancetaking
in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation,
Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fox, Barbara A. and Sandra A. Thompson. 2010. “Responses
to Wh-questions in English conversation”. Research on Language and Social
Interaction 43(2): 133–156.
Gabrielsen, Jonas, Heidi Jønch-Clausen, and Chrisina Pontoppidan. 2020. “Answering
without answering: Shifting as an evasive rhetorical
strategy”. Journalism 21(9): 1355–1370.
Goodwin, Charles and Marjorie H. Goodwin. 1987. “Concurrent
operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assesments”. Papers in
Pragmatics 1(1): 1–54.
Heritage, John and David Greatbatch. 1986. “Generating
applause: A study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences”. American Journal of
Sociology 921: 110–157.
Hunston, Susan and John Sinclair. 2000. “Towards
a local grammar of evaluation.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial
Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 74–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lindström, Anna and Lorenza Mondada. 2009. “Assessments
in social interaction: Introduction to the special issue”. Research on Language & Social
Interaction 42(4): 299–308.
Martin, James and Peter White. 2005. The
Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Piirainen-Marsh, Arja. 2005. “Managing
adversarial questioning in broadcast interviews”. Journal of Politeness
Research 1(2): 193–217.
Piirainen-Marsh, Arja and Heidi Jauni. 2012. “Assessments
and the social construction of expertise in political TV interviews”. Text and
Talk 32(5): 637–660.
Pomerantz, Anita M. 1984. “Agreeing and disagreeing with
assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn
shapes.” In Structures of social action: Studies in conversation
analysis, ed. by Maxwell J. Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. “Grammar
and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding”. American
Sociological
Review 68(6): 939–967.
Raymond, Geoffrey and John Heritage. 2006. “The
epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren”. Language in
Society 35(5), 677–705.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction. A
primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stivers, Tanya and Makoto Hayashi. 2010. “Transformative
answers: One way to resist a questions constraints”. Language in
Society 39(1): 1–25.
Thompson, Geoff and Laura Alba-Juez. 2014. Evaluation
in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Alroumi, Abdulrahman
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
