Article published In: Dialogicity in Political Discourse
Edited by Elda Weizman and Zohar Livnat
[Pragmatics and Society 13:5] 2022
► pp. 793–814
When invoked voices blame real politicians
Confrontational blaming in a speech from Austria’s “commemorative year” 2018
Published online: 6 December 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21021.gru
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21021.gru
Abstract
This case study analyses the socio-pragmatic effects of invoked multiple voices in a commemorative speech delivered by Austrian writer Michael Köhlmeier on the occasion of the 2018 Austrian commemoration day against violence and fascism. Köhlmeier uses different forms of discourse representation to blame politicians of the then Austrian government for their political statements and actions. The focus of this article is on the speaker’s combination of (imagined and real) sources and forms of discourse representation, resulting in strategically deployed perspective shifts to express opposition and blame. Furthermore, the sociopragmatic functions of these rhetorical and textual strategies in the context of situation, as well as in the wider context of the Austrian culture of collective remembrance are explored, in particular by showing that by blaming actual Austrian politicians for their political statements and actions, the traditional consensual commemorative discourse is breached. This latter effect is probably responsible for the huge public attention the speech attracted in 2018.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Political genres and their dialogicity
- 3.The commemoration day against violence and fascism on May, 4 2018
- 4.Analysis
- 4.1Invoking the situational relevance of Köhlmeier’s speech
- 4.2Unfolding the confrontational blaming
- Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (34)
Antaki, Charles, and Ivan Leudar. 2001. ‘Recruiting the Record: Using Opponents’ Exact Words in Parliamentary Argumentation’. Text 21 (4): 467–88.
Aprent, Patrick. 2019. ‘Prägende Diskurse im Gedenkjahr 2018. Vergangenheit im Fokus öffentlicher Kommunikation (= Zeitgeschichte 46), ed. by Dirk Rupnow and Heidemarie Uhl, 501–535. Göttingen: Vienna University Press.
Atkinson, Max. 1984. Our Masters’ Voices: The Language and Body-Language of Politics. (New Ed.). London: Routledge.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Edited by C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bevitori, Cinzia. 2006. ‘Speech Representation in Parliamentary Discourse. Rhetorical Strategies in a Heteroglossic Perspective: A Corpus-Based Study.’ In Studies in Specialized Discourse, edited by John Flowerdew and Maurizio Gotti, 155–179. Bern: Peter Lang.
Cap, Piotr. 2015. ‘Follow-Ups in the US Anti-Terrorist Discourse: Proposal for a Macro-Discursive Approach to Monologic Follow-Up Sequences.’ Discourse & Society 26 (5): 543–61.
De Fina, Anna, and Alexandra Georgakopoulou. 2012. Analyzing Narrative: Discourse and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dynel, Marta. 2014. ‘On the Part of Ratified Participants: Ratified Listeners in Multi-Party Interactions’. Brno Studies in English 40 (1): 27–44.
Fetzer, Anita. 2020. ‘And I Quote: Forms and Functions of Quotations in Prime Minister’s Questions’. Journal of Pragmatics 1571: 89–100.
Goffman, Erving. 1969. The presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Grice, Paul. 1991. ‘Logic and Conversation’. In Pragmatics. A Reader, edited by Steven Davis, 305–15. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gruber, Helmut. 1991. Antisemitismus im Mediendiskurs: Die Affäre Waldheim in der Tagespresse. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.
. 2015. ‘Policy-Oriented Argumentation or Ironic Evaluation: A Study of Verbal Quoting and Positioning in Austrian Politicians’ Parliamentary Debate Contributions’. Discourse Studies 17 (6): 682–702.
. 2018. ‘Debating or Displaying Political Positions? – MPs’ Reactive Statements during the Inaugural Speech Debates in the Austrian Parliament’. Pragmatics and Society 9 (4): 571–97.
. 2019. ‘Staged Conflicts in Austrian Parliamentary Debates’. Language and Dialogue 9 (1): 42–64.
Harris, Sandra. 2001. ‘Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse’. Discourse & Society 12 (4): 451–72.
Hodges, Adam. 2008. ‘The Politics of Recontextualization: Discursive Competition over Claims of Iranian Involvement in Iraq’. Discourse & Society 191 (4): 483–505
Klein, Josef. 2000. ‘Textsorten im Bereich Politischer Institutionen’. In Handbuch der Text- und Gesprächsanalyse 21, edited by Gerd Antos, Klaus Brinker, and Sven F. Sager, 1589–1605. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
Kuo, Sai-Hua. 2001. ‘Reported Speech in Chinese Political Discourse.’ Discourse Studies 3 (2): 181–202.
Kurzon, Dennis. 1996. ‘The White House Speeches: Semantic and Paralinguistic Strategies for Eliciting Applause’. Text & Talk 16 (2): 199–224.
Obermayer, Bastian, and Frederik Obermaier. 2019. Die Ibiza-Affäre: Innenansichten eines Skandals. 5th ed. KiWi-Paperback.
Reber, Elisabeth. 2014. ‘Obama Said It: Quoting as an Evidential Strategy in Online Discussion Forums’. Language and Dialogue 4 (1): 76–92.
Reisigl, Martin. 2007. Nationale Rhetorik in Fest- und Gedenkreden: Eine Diskursanalytische Studie zum ‘Österreichischen Millennium’ in den Jahren 1946 und 1996. Stauffenburg Aktuell, Bd. 7. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Rupnow, Dirk, and Heidemarie Uhl, eds. 2019. ‘Gedenkjahr 2018: Vergangenheit im Fokus öffentlicher Kommunikation’. Zeitgeschichte 461.
Shibata, Masaki. 2020. ‘Why Do Politicians Cite Others in Political Debates?: A Functional Analysis of Reported Speech in a Japanese Political Debate’. Journal of Language and Politics 19 (4): 604–23.
Sivenkova, Maria A. 2016. ‘Intertextual References in British, German and Russian Political Interviews and Blogs’. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 61 (1): 161–83.
Suleiman, Camelia, Daniel C. O’Connell, and Sabine Kowal. 2002. ‘“If You and I, If We, in This Later Day, Lose That Sacred Fire …”: Perspective in Political Interviews’. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31 (3): 269–87.
Tannen, Deborah. 1989. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2019. ‘Changing Perspectives. Something Old, Something New’. Pragmatics 29 (2): 170–197.
Weiss, Daniel. 2020. ‘Analogical Reasoning with Quotations? A Spotlight on Russian Parliamentary Discourse’. Journal of Pragmatics 1551: 101–10.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
