Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 16:3 (2025) ► pp.401–420

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Face attributes in interviews with Iranian politicians

ORCiD logo with link | University of Malaya
 | University of Malaya
Published online: 25 July 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.20084.bah
Abstract
This study examines face attributes in political interviews involving interviewers working for western broadcasting companies and Iranian politicians. The data consists of 10 hours of talk. The topic raised in the interviews is concerned with Iran’s human rights which have aroused concern and been the focus of international attention. Iranian politicians interviewed on global media are often questioned about Iran’s non-conformity with Human Rights Council. The study revealed that the interviewers ascribed the Iranian politicians with the negative attributes of lack of universalism, non-benevolence, lack of power, non-conformity, and lack of self-direction and the interviewees claimed the positive attributes of security, conformity, benevolence, universalism, self-direction, achievement and tradition to save or enhance their face.
Also, the findings demonstrated that Iranian politicians tended to be more concerned with their collective face.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Face and identity
    • 2.2Attributes
    • 2.3Face threat and face concerns
      • 2.3.1Schwartz’s value theory
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Analysing face in face-threatening contexts
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • References
References (46)
References
Arundale, Robert B. 2010. “Constituting face in conversation: face, facework, and interactional achievement.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 2078–2105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bardi, Anat, Rusi Jaspal, Ela Polek, and Shalom H. Schwartz. 2014. “Values and Identity Process Theory: theoretical integration and empirical interactions.” In Identity Process Theory: Identity, Social Action and Social Change, ed. by Rusi Jaspal, and Glynis M. Breakwell, 175–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blitvich, Pilar Garcés-Conejos. 2013. “Face, identity and im/politeness. Looking backward, moving forward: From Goffman to practice theory.” Journal of Politeness Research 29 (1): 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bousfield, Derek. 2013. “Face in conflict.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1 (1): 37–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brewer, Marilynn B. 2007. “Social identity and close relationships: What is the Connection?” Paper presented at the Sydney Symposium of Social Psychology, Sydney, Australia [URL]
Brewer, Marilynn B., and Wendy L. Gardner. 1996. “Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71(1): 83–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bull, Peter, Judy Elliot, Derrol Palmer, and Libby Walker. 1996. “Why politicians are three-faced: The face model of political interviews.” British Journal of Social Psychology 351: 267–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Kate Mayer. 1993. “How not to answer questions in political interviews.” Political Psychology 14 (4): 651–666. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, Wei-Lin M., and Michael Haugh. 2011. “Strategic embarrassment and face threatening in business interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 2948–2963. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Rong, and Kwang-Kuo Hwang. 2016. “Nation, face, and identity: An initial investigation of national face in East Asia.” Frontiers in Psychology 7 (1557) 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage. 2002. The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
David, Ohad, and Daniel Bar-Tal. 2009. “A sociopsychological conception of collective identity: The case of national identity as an example.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 131: 354–379. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmertsen, Sofie. 2007. “Interviewers’ challenging questions in British debate interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics 391: 570–591. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Franey, James. 2014, November 7. Iran’s Larijani slams West’s ‘bias’ on human rights. [URL] (accessed 20 July 2018).
Goffman, Erving. 1955. “On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements of social interaction.” Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes 18(3): 213–231. Reprinted in Goffman (2005, pp. 5–46). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1967. On Face Work. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face- to- face Behaviour. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hogg, Michael, and Dominic Abrams. 1988. Social Identification: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. Country summary: Iran. January 2015. [URL] (accessed 4 July 2018)
Jaspal, Rusi, and Adrian Coyle. 2009. “Reconciling social psychology and sociolinguistics can have some benefits: Language and identity among second generation British Asians.” Social Psychological Review 11 (2): 3–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jenkins, Richard. 1996. Social Identity. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joseph, John E. 2013. “Identity work and face work across linguistic and cultural boundaries.” Journal of Politeness Research 9 (1): 35–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katzman, Kenneth. 2017. “Iran: Politics, human rights, and U.S. policy.” Congressional Research Service, 1–40. [URL] (accessed 6 September 2015).
Lim, Tae-Seop. 1994. “Facework and Interpersonal Relationships.” In The challenge of facework, ed. by Stella Ting-Toomey, 209–229. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mavaddat, Fariba. 2013, March 15. Euronews interview – Mohammad Larijani, responsable du Haut-conseil Iranien aux droits de l’homme [URL] (accessed 18 October 2019).
Mohammadi, Majid. 2007. “Iranian women and the civil rights movement in Iran: Feminism interacted.” Journal of International Women’s Studies 9 (1): 1–21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oyserman, Daphna, Kristen Elmore, and George Smith. 2012. “Self, Self-Concept, and Identity.” In Handbook of Self and Identity, eds. by Mark R. Leary, and June Price Tangney (Chap. 4). New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rose, Charlie. 2011, November 18. Mohammad-Javad Larijani, head of Iran’s Human Rights Council, joins Charlie at the table for a full hour to tackle the Iranian nuclear deal and tensions between the U.S. and his country. [URL] (accessed 22 July 2016).
. 2014, January 8. Iranian Ambassador to the United Nations Mohammad Khazaee examines the relationship between the United States and Iran and its evolution in recent years. [URL] (accessed 16 August 2016).
. 2015, April 29. Part two of a discussion with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif about ongoing nuclear negotiations and the relationship between Iran and the United States. [URL] (accessed 14 August 2017).
Salehi, Ali A. 2012. February 28. Iran has best human rights record in the Muslim world. Tehran Times. [URL] (accessed 15 July 2017).
Schwartz, Shalom H. 1992. “Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. by Mark P. Zanna, 251: 1–65. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. “Values: Cultural and Individual.” In Fundamental Questions in Cross-Cultural Psychology, ed. by Fons J. R. van de Vijver, Athanasios Chasiotis, and Seger. M. Breugelmans, 463–493. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. “An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values.” Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2 (1): 1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. “Basic Individual Values: Sources and Consequences.” In Handbook of Value: Perspectives from Economics, Neuroscience, Philosophy, Psychology and Sociology, ed. by Tobias Brosch and David Sander. Oxford: UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. “The Refined Theory of Basic Values.” In Values and Behavior: Taking a Cross Cultural Perspective, ed. by Sonia Roccas and Lilach Sagiv, 51–72. Springer, Cham. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwartz, Shalom H., and Anat Bardi. 2001. “Value hierarchies across cultures. Taking a similarities perspective.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32 (3): 268–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwartz, Shalom H., Jan Cieciuch, Michele Vecchione, Eldad Davidov, Ronald Fischer, Constanze Beierlein, Alice Ramos, Markku Verkasalo, Jan-Erik Lönnqvist, Kursad Demirutku, Ozlem Dirilen-Gumus and Mark Konty. 2012. “Refining the theory of basic individual values.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 103 (4): 663–688. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon, Bernd. 2004. Identity in Modern Society: A Social Psychological Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2007. “Theories of identity and the analysis of face.” Journal of Pragmatics 391: 639–656. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Face, identity and interactional goals”. In Face, Communication and Social Interaction, ed. by Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini and Michael Haugh, 137–154. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Jiayi Wang. 2019. “Culture, context, and concerns about face: Synergistic insights from pragmatics and social psychology.” The Journal of Language and Social Psychology 38 (4): 423–440. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri and John C. Turner. 1986. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behaviour”. In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, ed. by Stephen Worchel and William G. Austin, 33–47. CA: Brooks/Cole, Monterey.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Jiayi, and Helen Spencer-Oatey. 2015. “The gains and losses of face in ongoing intercultural interaction: A case study of Chinese participant perspectives.” Journal of Pragmatics 891: 50–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy is what stated make of it.” International Organisation 461: 391–426. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue