Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 14:5 (2023) ► pp.777–800

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Rhetorical strategies for the construction of a corporate identity

A case study based on Huawei annual reports

 | University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijing
 | City University of Hong KongHong Kong
 | University of Science and Technology BeijingBeijing
Published online: 3 April 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.20076.wu
Abstract
Using Huawei annual reports as data sources, this study examines rhetorical strategies in business discourse for the construction of corporate identity. A socio-pragmatic framework is proposed for analysing such strategies, incorporating a textual analysis of rhetorical strategies, a discourse analysis of pragmatic functions and discursive tendencies, and a social analysis of the construction of corporate identity. The research concludes that, among other strategies, allusion and reference demonstrate the discursive tendency of commodification, while parody and metaphor highlight the discursive tendency of democratisation. In terms of the constructive functions, allusion, reference, parody, and metaphor are used to construct the commerciality, legitimacy, approachability, and entrepreneurship of an enterprise, respectively. This study highlights the importance of rhetorical strategies for the construction of corporate identity and the necessity for annual report writers to employ rhetorical strategies for better corporate communication.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Choice of annual reports
    • 3.2Choice of organization
    • 3.3Choice of analytical method
  • 4.Analytical framework
  • 5.Text analysis of linguistic features of rhetorical strategies
    • 5.1Allusion
    • 5.2Reference
    • 5.3Parody
    • 5.4Metaphor
  • 6.Discourse analysis of the functions of rhetorical strategies and discursive tendencies affecting the order of discourse
    • 6.1Discourse functions of rhetorical strategies
    • 6.2Discursive tendencies affecting the order of discourse
  • 7.Social analysis of the corporate identity constructed
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Declaration of conflicting interests
  • Notes
  • References
References (38)
References
Anderson, Claire and Giovanna Imperia. 1992. “The corporate annual report: A photo analysis of male and female portrayals.” The Journal of Business Communication 22 (2): 113–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atakan-Dumana, Sirin, and Emel Ozdora-Aksak. 2014. “The role of corporate social responsibility in online identity construction: An analysis of Turkey’s banking sector.” Public Relations Review 40 (5): 862–864. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balmer, John. 2001. Corporate identity, corporate branding and corporate marketing—seeing through the fog. European Journal of Marketing 35(3–4): 248–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benwell, Bethan, and Elizabeth Stokoe. 2006. Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K., and Jane Lung. 2006. “Corporate identity and generic integrity in business discourse.” In Intercultural and international business communication, ed. by Juan Carlos Plamer-Silveria, Miguel F. Ruiz-Garrido and Immaculada Fortanet-Gomez, 265–285. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K. 2010. “Interdiscursivity in professional communication.” Discourse & Communication 21 (1): 32–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. “Contested identities in corporate disclosure documents.” In Discourse and identity in the professions: Legal, corporate and institutional citizenship, ed. by Vijay K. Bhatia and Paola Evangelisti-Allori, 27–44. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boltzmann, Ludwig. 1974. “The second law of thermodynamics.” In Theoretical Physics and Philosophical Problems, ed. by Brian McGinness, 13–32. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breeze, Ruth. 2013. Corporate discourse. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth. 1969. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley and Los Angeles, Cal.: University of California Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Fina, Anna, Deborah Schiffrin and Michael Bamberg. 2006. Discourse and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and social change. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feng, Wei. 2017. Discursive constructions of corporate identities by Chinese banks on Sina Weibo: An integrated sociolinguistics approach. Singapore: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gándara, Lelia. 2004. “‘They that sow the wind…’: Proverbs and sayings in argumentation.” Discourse & Society 15(2–3): 345–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ihlen, Øyvind, and Robert L. Heath. 2018. The Handbook of Organization Rhetoric and Communication. HN.J.: Wiley Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hatfield, Elaine, Richard L. Rapson and Yen-Chi L. Le. 2011. “Emotional contagion and empathy.” In The Social Neuroscience of Empathy, ed. by Jean Decety and William Ickes, 19–30. Boston, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawes, Colin, and Eng Chew. 2011. “The cultural transformation of large Chinese enterprises into internationally competitive corporations: case studies of Haier and Huawei.” Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies 9 (1): 67–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
He, Saike, Zheng, Xiaolong, Zeng, Daniel, Luo, Chuan & Zhu Zhang. Exploring entrainment patterns of human emotion in social media. PLoS ONE, 2016(3). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofstede, Geert, Gert J. Hofstede and Michael Minkov. 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of Mind. 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopwood, Anthony G. 1996. “Introduction.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 21 (1): 55–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunt, Lester H. 2009. “Literature as fable, fable as argument.” Philosophy and Literature 33 (2): 369–385. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johansen, Trine S. and Anne E. Nielsen. 2016. “Constructing non-profit identity in the midst of stakeholder complexity.” International studies of management & organization 46 (4): 216–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambert, Andrew. 1989. Corporate identity and facilities management. Facilities 7 (12): 7–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liao, Mei-Zhen. 1999. “Metaphor as a textual strategy in English.” Text 19 (2): 227–252.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1968. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mina, Abbassi Bonabi, and Hemmati Fatemeh. 2012. “Exploring the textual variations of metaphors in terms of rank dimension and their discoursal values across different text-types.” Theory and practice in language studies 2 (10): 2209–2218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peverelli, Peter J. 2006. Chinese Corporate Identity. London and New York, N.Y.: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pollach, Irene. 2005. “Corporate self-representation on the WWW: Strategies for enhancing usability, credibility and utility.” Corporate Communication: An International Journal 10 (4): 285–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rose, Margaret A. 1979. Parody, meta-fiction: An analysis of parody as a critical mirror to the writing and reception of fiction. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Singh, Nitish, Hongxin Zhao, and Xiaorui Hu. 2003. “Cultural adaptation on the Web: A study of American companies’ domestic and Chinese websites.” Journal of Global Information Management 11 (3): 63–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sommerfeldt, Erich. 2011. “Activist e-mail action alerts and identification: Rhetorical relationship building strategies in collective action.” Public Relations Review (37): 87–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The PAD Research Group. 2016. “Not so ‘innocent’ after all? Exploring corporate identity construction online.” Discourse & Communication 10 (3): 291–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2007. “Legitimation in discourse and communication.” Discourse & Communication 1 (1): 91–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Welch, Mary, and Paul R. Jackson. 2007. “Rethinking internal communication: a stakeholder approach.” Corporate Communication 12 (2): 177–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Wu, Nan & Yubin Qian
2024. Strategic manoeuvring of argumentation in Chinese corporate public relations discourses. Discourse & Communication 18:3 ► pp. 452 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue