Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 15:5 (2024) ► pp.732–754

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

A politeness-theoretic approach to mitigated disagreements in online radio medical consultations

ORCiD logo with link | Nanjing University
Published online: 10 October 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.20069.zha
Abstract
In medical settings, disagreement between doctors and patients frequently occurs, and it is considered a potential trigger to elicit conflicts. Hence, the point of departure for this study is the widely accepted view that these kinds of “face-threatening” and “dispreferred” acts need to be modified. Thus, this study sheds light on analyzing doctor-patient’s discourse in 25 episodes of online radio medical consultation, reporting on Chinese doctors’ mitigated disagreement forms and offering a novel perspective on how Chinese doctors use these mitigated disagreements to turn divergent ideas into alignment with patients in online radio medical consultation. The findings in this study provide preliminary empirical support for the idea that mitigated disagreements can be seen as a sign of relational work and may not destroy but rather strengthen doctor-patient’s relations.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Mitigated disagreements: Politeness and relational issues
  • 3.Research method
    • 3.1Research questions
    • 3.2Data collection
    • 3.3Data analysis
  • 4.Types of mitigated disagreements
    • 4.1Prosodic strategies
      • 4.1.1Hesitation pauses
      • 4.1.2Responsive laughs
    • 4.2Syntactic strategies
      • 4.2.1Requests for clarification
      • 4.2.2Contradictory assertions
    • 4.3Discourse strategies
      • 4.3.1Drawing analogies
      • 4.3.2Previous mutual memory
  • 5.Underlying motivations behind doctors’ mitigated disagreements
    • 5.1Cognitive motivations
    • 5.2Emotional motivations
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
References (56)
References
Angouri, Jo and Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini. 2011. “‘So, What Problems Bother You and You Are Not Speeding Up Your Work?’ Problem Solving Talk at Work.” Discourse & Communication 5 (3): 209–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Angouri, Jo and Miriam A. Locher. 2012. “Theorizing Disagreement”. Journal of Pragmatics 441: 1549–1553. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beebe, Leslie M. and Tomoko Takahashi. 1989. “Sociolinguistic Variation in Face-Threatening Speech Acts: Chastisement and Disagreement.” In The Dynamic Interlanguage: Empirical Studies in Second Language Variation, ed. by M. R. Eisenstein, 199–218. New York: Plenum Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, Nancy. 1998. “Politeness in the Speech of Korean ESL Learners.” Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 141: 25–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bordin, Edward S. 1979. “The Generalizability of the Psychoanalytic Concept of the Working Alliance.” Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice 161: 252–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Xinren. 2019. “‘You’re a Nuisance!’: ‘Patch-up’ Jocular Abuse in Chinese Fiction.” Journal of Pragmatics 1391: 52–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chiang, Shiao-Yun. 2009. “Personal Power and Positional Power in a Powerfull ‘I’: A Discourse Analysis of Doctoral Dissertation Supervision.” Discourse Communication 3 (3): 255–271.
Dalton, Peggy and William Hardcastle. 1977. Disorders of Fluency. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuertes, Jairo N., Alexa Mislowack, Jennifer Bennett, Laury Paul, Tracey C. Gilbert, and Gerardo Fontan. 2007. “The Physician–patient Working Alliance”. Patient Education & Counseling 661: 29–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García, Carmen. 1989. “Disagreeing and Requesting by Americans and Venezuelans”. Linguistics and Education 131: 299–322. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2001. “Arguing About the Future: On Indirect Disagreements in Conversations”. Journal of Pragmatics 331: 1881–1900. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldman-Eisler, Frieda. 1968. Psycholinguistics: Experiments in Spontaneous Speech. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gozzard, Haley, Elise Baker and Patricia McCabe. 2008. “Requests for Clarification and Children’s Speech Responses: Changing ‘Pasghetti’ to ‘Spaghetti’.” Child Language Teaching and Therapy 241: 249–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenson, Ralph. 1971. “The Real Relationship Between the Patient and the Psychoanalyst” In the Unconscious Today, ed. by M. Kanzer, 213–232. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Allen. 1990. Conflict Talk. Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guo, Shanshan, Xiaotong Guo, Xiaofei Zhang, Doug Vogel. 2018. “Doctor-patient Relationship Strength’s Impact in an Online Healthcare Community.” Information Technology for Development 24 (2): 279–300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ho, Evelyn Y. 2006. “Behold the Power of Qi: The Importance of Qi in the Discourse of Acupuncture.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 39 (4): 411–440. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth. 2011. “On the Nature of ‘Laughables’: Laughter as a Response to Overdone Figurative Phrases.” Pragmatics 21(3): 393–410.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jin, Ying, Younhee Kim and Andrew P. Carlin. 2021. “Co-topical Small Talk: Troubles-Telling in Traditional Chinese Medical Encounters.” Applied Linguistics 43 (3): 493–516. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jin, Ying and Younhee Kim. 2022. “Dietary Advice in Chronic Care: Comparing Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Practiced in Mainland China.” Social Science & Medicine 2921: 114621. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga. 1993. “Disagreement and Concession in Disputes: On the Context Sensitivity of Preference Structures.” Language in Society 22 (2): 193–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreutel, Karen. 2007. “I’m Not Agree with You.” ESL Learners’ Expressions of Disagreement.” Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language 11 (3): 1–10.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1992. “Activity Types and Language.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by P. Drew and J. Heritage, 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewith, George, Julian Kenyon and Peter Lewis. 1996. Complementary Medicine: An Integrated Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Wei, Marie Gerdtz and Elizabeth Manias. 2016. “Creating Opportunities for Interdisciplinary Collaboration and Patient-centered Care: How Nurses, Doctors, Pharmacists and Patients Use Communication Strategies When Managing Medications in an Acute Hospital Setting.” Journal of Clinical Nursing 251: 19–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. 2004. Power and Politeness in Action. Disagreements in Oral Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. and Richard J. Watts. 2008. “Relational Work and Impoliteness: Negotiating Norms of Linguistic Behavior.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by D. Bousfield and M. A. Locher, 77–99. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lopez-Ozieblo, Renia. 2018. “Disagreeing Without a ‘No’: How Teachers Indicate Disagreement in a Hong Kong Classroom.” Journal of Pragmatics 1371: 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luborsky, Lester, Paul Crits-Christoph, Leslie Alexander, Miriam Margolis and Marjorie Cohen. 1983. “Two Helping Alliance Methods for Predicting Outcomes of Psychotherapy: A Counting Signs Versus a Global Rating Method.” Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease 171 (8): 480–492. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mao, Yansheng and Xin Zhao. 2019. “I Am a Doctor, and Here Is My Proof: Chinese Doctors’ Identity Constructed on the Online Medical Consultation Websites”. Health Communication 341: 1645–1652. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. “A Discursive Approach to Disagreements Expressed by Chinese Spokespersons During Press Conferences.” Discourse, Context & Media 371: 100428. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marneffe, Marie-Catherine, Anna N. Rafferty and Christopher D. Manning. 2008. “Finding Contradictions in Text.” Acl Anthology 7 (3): 1039–1047.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marra, Meredith. 2012. “Disagreeing Without Being Disagreeable: Negotiating Workplace Communities as an Outsider.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12): 1580–1590. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muntigl, Peter and William Turnbull. 1998. “Conversational Structure and Facework in Arguing.” Journal of Pragmatics 291: 225–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newman, Peter A., Adrian Guta and Tara Black. 2021. “Ethical Considerations for Qualitative Research Methods During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Emergency Situations: Navigating the Virtual Field.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panić-Kavgić, Olga. 2010. “Mitigated Disagreement in Dialogues Selected from an American and a Serbian Film.” Annual Review of the Faculty of Philosophy 35 (2): 429–440.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Maison des Sciences de 1’Homme and Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pritzker, Sonya E. 2012. “Living Translation in US Chinese Medicine.” Language in Society 41 (3): 343–363. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. “Standardization and Its Discontents: Translation, Tension, and the Life of Language in Contemporary Chinese Medicine.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 81: 25–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Provine, Robert R. 2001. “Laughter: A Scientific Investigation”. Yale Journal of Biology & Medicine 74 (2): 141–143.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raue, Patrick, Louis Castonguay and Marvin Goldfried. 1993. “The Working Alliance: A Comparison of Two Therapies.” Psychotherapy Research 3 (3): 197–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rees-Miller, Janie. 2000. “Power, Severity, and Context in Disagreement”. Journal of Pragmatics 321: 1087–1111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reynolds, April. 2009. “Patient-centered Care.” Radiologic Technology 81(2): 133–147.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scarduzio, Jennifer A. 2017. “Emic Approach to Qualitative Research.” In The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, eds. by J. Matthes, C. S. Davis and R. F. Potter, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stallone, Letícia and Michael Haugh. 2017. “Joint Fantasizing as Relational Practice in Brazilian Portuguese Interactions.” Language & Communication 51, 10–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tjosvold, Dean William. 2008. “The Conflict-positive Organization: It Depends Upon Us”. Journal of Organizational Behavior 291: 19–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagner, Edward H., Russell E. Glasgow and McCulloch Davis. 2001. “Quality Improvement in Chronic Illness Care: A Collaborative Approach”. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement 27 (2): 63–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waitzkin, Howard. 1985. “Information Giving in Medical Care”. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 261: 81–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Xueyu and Rujie Cao. 2023. “Thanks for Trusting Me, Parent: Chinese Pediatricians’ Epistemic Behaviour for Trustworthiness in Online Medical Consultations.” East Asian Pragmatics 8 (2): 271–289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, Yefei, Xiaofei Zhang and Peter K. C. Lee. 2019. “Improving the Effectiveness of Online Healthcare Platforms: An Empirical Study with Multi-period Patient-Doctor Consultation Data”. International Journal of Production Economics 2071: 70–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhan, Kaicheng. 2016. Embodiment in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) Discourse: Healing, Silence and the Miracle Cure. Syracuse University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhao, Xin and Yansheng Mao. 2021. “How to Grapple with the Green-eyed Monster: A Discursive Approach to Jealousy Management in Chinese TV Dramas”. Language & Communication 791: 133–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhu, Weihua and Jun Wang. 2022. “Disagreement by Chinese Speakers of English: Evidence of Pragmatic Transfer”. Language Sciences 931: 101487. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Cheng, Ruixin & Chuting Song
2025. Online Self-Presentation by Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine Medical Professionals in China. Health Communication 40:5 ► pp. 921 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Yidi, Xiaoya Yang & Jiaying Liu
2024. Navigating Sensitive Conversations: Patient-Centered Communication and Politeness Markers in Chinese Online Medical Consultations. Healthcare 12:23 ► pp. 2465 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue