Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 14:3 (2023) ► pp.442–460

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Parentheses used as pragmatic strategies in Chinese online socialization

ORCiD logo with link | Jinan University
 | Uppsala University
Published online: 3 April 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.20058.li
Abstract
This paper details the use of parentheses as pragmatic strategies in Chinese network socialization. The data were collected from Weibo, Wechat, QQ and other online social platforms, and analyzed from the perspective of Cyberpragmatics. We consider the pragmatic features and functions of parentheses as an indivisible part of the whole unit in relation to emojis or graphicons. As pragmatic strategies, parentheses aid speakers in indirectly performing various pragmatic intentions, like adding supplementary information to the interaction, isolating different topics, and contrasting content between the text outside and within parentheses. Further pragmatic functions realized by parentheses include indirectly conveying intention, relieving communicative awkwardness and adjusting interlocutors expectations. We conclude that using parentheses as pragmatic strategies in network socialization is the result of the evolution of the Internet language, and varies from the use of other emojis, which directly convey intentions and meaning.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Parentheses used in network socialization
  • 3.Research methods
    • 3.1Data
    • 3.2Research approach
  • 4.Textual features and functions of parentheses
    • 4.1Textual features of parentheses
      • 4.1.1Major use of state verbal phrases
      • 4.1.2Frequent use of concise phrases
      • 4.1.3Less frequent use of complete utterances
    • 4.2Textual functions of parentheses
      • 4.2.1Offering supplementary information
      • 4.2.2Isolating different topics
      • 4.2.3Contrasting content between outside and in parentheses
  • 5.Parentheses as pragmatic strategies
    • 5.1Strategy for indirectly conveying intention
    • 5.2Strategy for relieving awkwardness
      • 5.2.1Generating self-deprecation
      • 5.2.2Creating humorous effects
    • 5.3Strategy for adjusting interlocutor expectations
      • 5.3.1Increasing speaker expectations
      • 5.3.2Lowering speaker expectations
  • 6.Discussion and concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (40)
References
Bajcar, Beata and Jolanta Babiak. 2020. “Neuroticism and cyberchondria: The mediating role of intolerance of uncertainty and defensive pessimism.” Personality and Individual Differences 1621. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, Wei-Lin Melody and Michael Haugh. 2011. “Strategic embarrassment and face threatening in business interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 2948–2963. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dainas, Ashley R. and Susan C. Herring. 2021. Interpreting emoji pragmatics. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and practice. Eds. by Chaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus and Hartmut Haberland, 107–144. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eisenchlas, Susana A. 2011. “On-line interactions as a resource to raise pragmatic awareness.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 51–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feng, Hairong. 2015. “Understanding cultural variations in giving advice among Americans and Chinese.” Communication Research 42 (8): 143–1167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. New York: Doubleday and Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert P. 1975. Logic and conversation. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gu, Yueguo. 1990. “Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 237–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2016. “‘Just kidding’: Teasing and claims to non-serious intent.” Journal of Pragmatics 951: 120–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael and Derek Bousfield. 2012. “Mock impoliteness, jocular mockery and jocular abuse in Australian and British English.” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 1099–1114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael and Wei-Lin Melody Chang. 2019. “The apology seemed (in)sincere”: Variability in perceptions of (im)politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 1421: 207–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet, Meredith Marra and Bernadette Vine. 2012. Politeness and impoliteness in New Zealand English workplace discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 441: 1063–1076. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott F. and Elka G. Johnson. 2010. “Four forms of interactional indirection.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 292–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman, 1983.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey and Mick Short. 2007. Style in Fiction-A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose (2nd Edition). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara. 2020. “Culture-driven emotional profiles and online discourse extremism.” Pragmatics and Society 11(2): 262–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. and Richard J. Watts. 2005. “Politeness theory and relational work.” Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 9–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luo, Luxin. 2018. “Variations of Online Punctuation: Bracket+.” Journal of Shenyang University (Social Science) 20(04): 472–476.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction (second edition). Oxford: Blackwell [1993].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2021. Expanding pragmatics: Values, goals, ranking, and internet adaptability. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and practice, ed. by Chaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus and Hartmut Haberland: 27–45. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, Elizabeth R. 2013. “Positioning selves, doing relational work and constructing identities in interview talk.” Journal of Politeness Research 9(1): 75–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morini, Massimiliano. 2013. The Pragmatic Translator: An Integral Theory of Translation. London, New Delhi, New York, N.Y. and Sydney: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norem, Julie K. 2008. “Defensive pessimism, anxiety, and the complexity of evaluating self-regulation.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2(1): 121–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Placencia, Maria Elena, Amanda Lower and Hebe Powell Birkbeck. 2016. “Complimenting behaviour on Facebook Responding to compliments in American English.” Pragmatics and Society 7(3): 339–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Robert, and Lenore Jacobson. 1968. Pygmalion in the classroom: teacher expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. New York, N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1975. “Indirect speech acts.” In Syntax and Semantics. Speech Acts, ed. By Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 59–82. New York, N.Y.: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shen, Jiaxuan. 2016. Nouns and Verbs. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xie, Chaoqun, Francisco Yus, and Hartmut Haberland eds. 2021. Approaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and practice. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yip, Jesse W.C. 2020. “Directness of advice giving in traditional Chinese medicine consultations.” Journal of Pragmatics 1661: 28–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2005. Attitudes and emotions through written text: the case of textual deformation in Internet chat rooms. Pragmalingua 131: 147–176.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Not All Emoticons Are Created Equal.” Linguagem em (dis)curso 14 (3): 511–529. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Contextual constraints and non-propositional effects in Whats App communication.” Journal of Pragmatics 1141: 66–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “Identity-related issues in meme communication.” Internet Pragmatics 1(1): 113–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Song, Chuting & Tiancheng Chen
2025. Parenthetical annotations on WeChat Moments: metapragmatic usage and the role of platform features. Discourse, Context & Media 68 ► pp. 100961 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Yi, Luoxiangyu Zhang, Wei Ren & Yuanbo Liu
2025. “(scream)(wriggle)(dismally crawl)” – parentheses as semiotic resources for translanguaging and trans-semiotic practices on Chinese micro-blogging. Social Semiotics 35:2 ► pp. 294 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue