Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 14:4 (2023) ► pp.568–592

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Variation and society

The periphrases tener/haber que + infinitive by sex/gender of participants in Spanish

ORCiD logo with link | Universidad de La Laguna
Published online: 18 April 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.20040.ser
Abstract
In Spanish, tener que and haber que + infinitive are modal periphrases that convey deontic meanings. The present investigation analyzes these periphrases as variants used in diverse communicative settings by different kinds of participants, acting as either speakers/writers or addressees. Tener que + infinitive tends to appear in those contexts where a more striking implication or unavoidable recommendation is needed. Haber que + infinitive is used more in a wide range of genres promoting a desubjectivizing-deontic meaning. As for the sex/gender of the participants, men more frequently use tener que + infinitive, whereas women tend to employ haber que + infinitive. The latter feature was also found to be significant when the sex/gender of the addressee is unknown; also, tener que + infinitive resulted more frequently in texts to be read or listened by women. The sociolinguistic distribution of the meanings conveyed by each periphrasis helps to delineate communicative styles based on the objectivity-subjectivity dimension.
Article outline
  • 1.Variation between modal periphrases and the cognitive-functional framework
  • 2.Modal deontics and desubjectivization
  • 3.Sociolinguistic analysis: The sex/gender of speakers and addressees/audience
  • 4.Methodology and corpus
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Variation across texts
    • 5.2Variation across sex/gender of participants
    • 5.3Communicative styles
  • 6.Conclusions
  • References
References (75)
References
Aijón Oliva, Miguel Ángel. A. 2019. Constructing us. The First and Second Persons in Spanish Media Discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aijón Oliva, Miguel Ángel and María José Serrano. 2013. Style in Syntax. Investigating Variation in Spanish Pronoun System. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “A Matter of Style: Gender and Subject Variation in Spanish”. Gender and Language 10 (2): 240–269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, Allan. 2014. The Guidebook to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bodine, Ann. 1975. “Sex Differentiation in Language”. In Language and Sex: Difference and dominance, ed. by Barrie Thorne and Nancy Henley, 130–151. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boogart, Ronny and Egbert Fortuin. 2016. “Modality and Mood in Cognitive Linguistics and Construction Grammars”. In The Oxford Handbook of Modality and Mood, ed. by Jan Nuyts and Johan van Auwera, 514–534. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bravo, Ana and Luis García Fernández. 2016. “Perífrasis Verbales”. In Enciclopedia de Lingüística Hispánica, ed. by Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach, 785–796. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broccias, Cristiano. 2016. “Cognitive Approaches to Grammar”. In Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives, ed. by Gitte Kristiansen, Francisco Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Michel Achard and René Dirven, 81–115. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan and Suzanne Fleischman. 1995. “Modality in Grammar and Discourse: an Introductory Essay”. In Modality in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by Joan Bybee and Suzanne Fleischman, 1–14. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 1985. Feminist and Linguistic Theory. London: McMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 1986. Women, Men and Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook-Gumperz, Jenny. 2001. “Girls’ Oppositional Stances: The Interactional Accomplishment of Gender in Nursery School and Family Life”. In Gender in Interaction, ed. by Bettina Baron and Helga Kotthoff, 21–50. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William and Allan D. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuyckens, Hubert, Kristin Davidse and Lieven Vandelanotte. 2010. “Introduction”. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, ed. by Hubert Cuyckens, Kristin Davidse and Lieven Vandelanotte, 1–26. Mouton: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drager, Katie. 2015. Linguistic Variation, Identity Construction and Cognition. Berlin: Language Science Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 1993. “Cooperative Competition in Adolescent Girl Talk”. In Gender and Conversational Interaction, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 32–61. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. The Linguistic Construction of Social Meaning in Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 2003. Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan, Benjamin Bergen and Jörg Zinken. 2007. “The Cognitive Linguistic Enterprise: an Overview”. In The Cognitive Linguistics Reader, ed. by Vyvyan Evans, Benjamin Bergen and Jörg Zinken, 2–36. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 2009. Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gili Gaya, Samuel. 1980. Curso Superior de Sintaxis Española. Barcelona: Biblograf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel. 2001. “Theorizing Gender: Feminist Awareness and Language Change”. In Gender in Interaction, ed. by Bettina Baron and Helga Kotthoff, 329–347. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gómez Torrego, Leonardo. 1988. Perífrasis verbales: sintaxis, semántica y estilística. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. La impersonalidad gramatical: descripción y norma. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goutier, N. 2009. “The Origin of Social Approach in Language and Cognition Research Exemplified by Studies into the Origins of Language”. In Language and Social Cognition: Expression of the Social Mind, ed. by Hanna Pishwa, 25–46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C. 2003. “Gender and Power in Online Communication”. In The Handbook of Language and Gender ed. by Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff, 202–223. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C. and Sharon Stoerger. 2014. “Gender and (A)nonymity in Computer-Mediated Communication”. In The Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality, ed. by Susan Ehrlich, Miriam Meyerhoff and Janet Holmes, 567–586. Oxford: Wiley- Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 2009. “Men, Masculinities and Leadership: Different Discourse Styles at Work”. In Gender and Spoken Interaction, ed. by Pia Pichler and Eva Eppler, 186–210. London: Palgrave McMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Language and Gender in the Workplace”. In The Handbook of Language, Gender and Sexuality ed. by Susan Ehrlich, Miriam Meyerhoff and Janet Holmes, 433–452. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
James, Deborah. 1996. Derogatory Terms for Men and Women: A New Look. Paper Presented at Gender and Belief Systems: Fourth Women and Language Conference. Berkeley: California.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1990. “The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change”. Language Variation and Change 2(2), 205–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1990. “The Invariance Hypothesis: Is Abstract Reason Based on Image-Schemas?” Cognitive Linguistics 1 (1): 39–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1973. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1985. “Observations and Speculations on Subjectivity”. In Iconicity in Syntax, ed. by John Haiman, 109–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999a. “Assessing the Cognitive Linguistic Enterprise”. In Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope and Methodology, ed. by Theo Janssen and Gisela Redeker, 15–39. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999b. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. “An Introduction to Cognitive Grammar”. In The Cognitive Linguistics Reader, ed. by Vyvyan Evans, Benjamin Bergen and Jörg Zinken, 444–480. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leon, Felipe. 2017. “From Modal Skepticism to Modal Empiricism”. In Modal Epistemology after Rationalism, ed. by Bob Fischer and Felipe Leon, 247–262. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maltz, Daniel N. and Bolker, Ruth A. 1982. “A Cultural Approach to Male-Female Miscommunication”. In Language and social identity, ed. by John. J. Gumperz, 196–216. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCormick, K. M. 2001. “Gender and Language”. In Concise Encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics, ed. by Rajend Mesthrie and R. E. Asher, 336–345. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, M. 2014. “Variation and Gender”. In The Handbook of Language, Gender and Sexuality, ed. by Susan Ehrlich, Miriam Meyerhoff and Janet Holmes, 87–102. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mills, Sara. 2012. Gender Matters. Feminist Linguistic Analysis. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mittelberg, Irene, Thomas A. Farmer and Linda R. Waugh. 2007. “They Actually Said That? An Introduction to Working with Usage Data through Discourse and Corpus Analysis”. In Methods in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Mónica González-Márquez, Irene Mittelberg, Seana Coulson and Michael J. Spivey, 19–52. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
NGLE 2010. Real Academia Española y Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española. Nueva gramática de la lengua española, Madrid, Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2007. “Cognitive Linguistics and Functional Linguistics”. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens, 543–566. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Analyses of the Modal Meanings”. In The Oxford Handbook of Modality and Mood, ed. by Jan Nuyts and Johan van der Auwera, 31–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, John. 2007. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perkins, Michael R. 1983. Modal Expressions in English. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pishwa, Hanna. 2009. “Linguistic Structures as Cues for Social Cognitive Functions: Introduction.” In Language and Social Cognition: Expression of the Social Mind, ed. by Hanna Pishwa, 1–22. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Portner, Paul. 2009. Modality. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramson, Evelyn N. 1977. “On the Representation of Modality”. Linguistics and Philosophy 11: 357–379. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Real Academia Española y Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española. 2005. Diccionario Panhispánico de Dudas. Madrid: Santillana.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharifian, Farzad. 2009. “On Collective Cognition and Language”. In Language and Social Cognition: Expression of the Social Mind, ed. by Hanna Pishwa, 163–180. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Serrano, María José. 2011. “Morphosyntactic Variation in Spain”. In Handbook of Hispanic Sociolinguistics, ed. by Manuel Díaz-Campos, 187–204. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “La variación sintáctica”. In Enciclopedia de Lingüística Hispánica, ed. by Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach, 809–821. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. “La textualización de la desubjetivización: variación entre la perífrasis haber que + infinitivo y el clítico se”. Oralia 23 (1): 131–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. “La modalidad deóntica como (de)subjetivación del discurso: variación entre las perífrasis haber/tener que+infinitivo», Anuario de Letras. Lingüística y Filología” IX (2): 43–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Serrano, María José and Miguel Ángel Aijón Oliva. 2011. “Syntactic Variation and Communicative Style”. Language Sciences 331: 138–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sunderland, Jane. 2004. Gendered Discourses. New York: Palgrave McMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Language and Gender. An Advance Resource Book. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sally. 2012. Variationist Sociolinguistics. Change, Observation, Interpretation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talbot, Mary. 2010. Language and Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 2007. “The Relation of Grammar to Cognition”. In The Cognitive Linguistics Reader, ed. by Vyvyan Evans, Bettina Bergen and Jörg Zinken, 481–544. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1986. That’s not what I meant! How Conversational Style Makes or Breaks your Relation with Others. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. You Just Don’t Understand. London: Virago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. “The Relativity of Linguistic Strategies. Rethinking Power and Solidarity in Gender and Dominance”. In Gender and Conversational Interaction, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 165–185. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. “Yes: Women and Men Talking: an Interactional Sociolinguistic Approach”. In Women, Men and Gender: Ongoing Debates, ed. by Mary Roth Walsh, 82–90. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyler, Andrea. 2008. “Introduction”. In Language in the Context of Use: Discourse and Cognitive Approaches to Language, ed. by Andrea Tyler, Kim Young and Mari Takada, 1–22. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich and Hans-Jörg Schmid. 1996. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Herk, Gerard. 2012. What is Sociolinguistics? Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weatherall, Ann. 2000. Gender Relevance in Talk-in-Interaction in Discourse. Discourse and Society 111: 290–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele. 2012. Discourse of Twitter and Social Media. London: Continuum Publishing group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Aijón Oliva, Miguel Ángel
2023. Opciones múltiples, significados diferentes: las construcciones modales deónticas en el dis-curso oral y escrito de los medios de comunicación peninsulares. Dicenda. Estudios de lengua y literatura españolas 41 ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Serrano, María José
2023. Sintaxis y discurso: el infinitivo independiente en los tuits como variante y punto de vista desubjetivador . Moenia DOI logo
Serrano, María José
2024. The variation of the indefinite pronoun uno as a desubjectivizing resource by sex/gender. Language, Culture and Society 6:2 ► pp. 223 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue