Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 12:2 (2021) ► pp.167–188
Drilling for fissures and exploiting common ground in the discourse of oil production
An enhanced eco-discourse analysis, Part 2
Published online: 3 June 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.20033.che
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.20033.che
Abstract
This is the second part of a two-part article which proposes an enhanced approach to eco-discourses after weighing
the (dis)advantages of mainstream Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and Positive Discourse Analysis (PDA). Part I (Chen, Wenge, Tom Bartlett and Huiling Peng. 2021. The Erasure of Nature in the Discourse of Oil Production: An Enhanced Eco-discourse Analysis, Part 1. Pragmatics and Society 12 1: 6–32.) explored the
theoretical grounding for an enhanced PDA, introduced the research method and then, based on the adapted analytic framework of
. 2016. Ecolinguistics:
Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live by. New York: Routledge., undertook a critical analysis of the discourses of Shell Oil Company
(SOC). Part II uses the same analytic framework to analyse Greenpeace USA’s (GPU) discourse and compare it to the SOC discourse.
The emphasis in Part II is on the exploration of potential fissures in the discourses across difference, and the possible common
grounds upon which to design alternative discourses that are empathetic, comprehensible and legitimate to a coalition of social
forces. Practically, Part II finds that the two groups use similar discourse strategies, such as salience and framing, but with
different orientations. Methodologically, Part II argues that corpus-aided comparative discourse analysis, with a focus on
discourse semantics, will facilitate the identification of ‘greenwashing’ strategies that strengthen and stabilize current
hegemonic social order. This part also points to avenues of alternative discourses which exploit the inherent contradictions or
fissures within that hegemonic order. Theoretically, the paper suggests that within an enhanced Positive Discourse Analysis
approach, it is also important to seek out points of convergence between progressive positions and to articulate these within a
hybrid, counter-hegemonic discourse that maximizes its potential for uptake, while it destabilizes the prevailing discourses at
precisely the fissure points identified.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Analysis and discussion
- 2.1Keyword analysis of GPU corpus
- 2.2Discourse semantic analysis of GPU discourse
- I.Salience patterns in GPU discourse
- i.Salience pattern of individual creature in GPU discourse
- ii.Salience pattern of habitat in GPU discourse
- iii.Salience pattern of sea ice in GPU discourse
- II.Facticity patterns in the GPU discourse
- i.Facticity pattern of energy projects
- ii.Facticity pattern of fossil fuel and natural gas in GPU discourse
- III.Framings pattern in GPU discourse
- I.Salience patterns in GPU discourse
- 3.Identifying fissures and seeking potential common grounds in discourses across differences
- 3.1Identifying the fissures in the dominant discourses
- 3.2Seeking the possible common ground in discourse across difference
- 4.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (21)
Bartlett, Tom. 2012. Hybrid
Voices and Collaborative Change: Contextualising Positive Discourse Analysis. New York: Routledge.
. 2018. Positive
Discourse Analysis. In: The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse
Studies, John Flowerdew and John E. Richardson (eds), 133–47. London: Routledge.
. 2019. Scaling
the Incommensurate: Discourses of Sustainability in the Western Isles of
Scotland. In: Critical Policy Discourse
Analysis, Nicolina Montessori et al. (eds), 242–263. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Bernstein, Brasil. 2000. Pedagogy,
Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Chen, Wenge, Tom Bartlett and Huiling Peng. 2021. The Erasure of Nature in the Discourse of Oil Production: An Enhanced Eco-discourse Analysis, Part 1. Pragmatics and Society 12 1: 6–32.
Halliday, M. A. K. and C. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. An
Introduction to Functional Grammar. (4th
edition.). London: Routledge.
Kramsch, Claire and Elizabeth Boner. 2010. Shadows
of Discourse: Intercultural Communication in Global Contexts. In: The
Handbook of Globalization, Nikolas Coupland (ed), Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
Kress, Gunther. 2000. Design
and Transformation: New Theories of Meaning. In: Multiliteracies:
Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures, Bill Cope and
Kalantzis (eds), 153–61. London: Routledge.
Luke, Allan. 2002. Beyond
Science and Ideology Critique: Developments in Critical Discourse Analysis. Annual Review of
Applied Linguistics 221: 96–110.
Macgilchrist, Felicitas and Ellen Van Praet. 2013. Writing
the History of the Victors? Discourse, Social change and (Radical) Democracy. Journal of
Language and
Politics 12 (4): 626–651.
Macgilchrist, Felicitas. 2016. Fissures
in the Discourse-scape: Critique, Rationality and Validity in Post-foundational Approaches to
CDS. Discourse &
Society 27(3) 262–277.
Martin, James R. 2004/2012. Positive Discourse
Analysis: Solidarity and Change. In: Collected Works of J.R.
Martin, Zhenhua Wang (ed), 278–98. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press.
1986/2012. Grammaticalizing Ecology:
The Politics of Baby Seals and Kangaroos. Collected Works of James R.
Martin, Zhenhua Wang (ed), 7–49. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Norris, Pippa. 2000. A
Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial
Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Halloran, Kieran. 2003. Critical
Discourse Analysis and Language
Cognition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Plec, Emily and Mary Pettenger. 2012. Greenwashing
Consumption: The Didactic Framing of ExxonMobil’s Energy Solutions. Journal of Environmental
Communication 6 (4): 459–476.
Plumwood, Val. 2003. Animals
and Ecology: Towards a Better Integration. Unpublished article in the ANU Digital Collection (available at: [URL]).
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Yang, Kaiwen & Ya Sun
Wang, Jiayu & Jinyan Liu
Li, Zhaoxia
Hampton, Jessica
Chen, Wenge, Tom Bartlett & Huiling Peng
2021. The erasure of nature in the discourse of oil production. Pragmatics and Society 12:1 ► pp. 6 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
