Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 13:4 (2022) ► pp.663–683

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Mitigating requesting acts by deaf Jordanian adults

 | Jordan University of Science and Technology
 | Jordan University of Science and Technology
Published online: 4 November 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.20016.nah
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the linguistic mitigating devices that deaf Jordanian adults use when making requests. To this end, a sample of 52 people (of whom 26 were hearing and 26 were deaf) was collected through a Discourse Completion Task (DCT). It was found that the two groups of participants showed variations in the way they structured their request acts and spelled them out. This was evident in the deaf group’s obvious underuse of certain request mitigation strategies and the lexico-grammatical items mapping them; in the absence of some strategies (i.e., sweetener, promise of reward, hint, and threat); and in the underassessment of social distance, relative power, and degree of imposition. This inappropriate use of requesting acts by deaf participants is attributed to their inadequate linguistic, pragma-linguistic and socio-pragmatic competence. The study concludes with some suggestions how to improve the Jordanian educational system for the deaf.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1Subjects
    • 3.2Research instruments
    • 3.3Procedures
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1Structure of request acts
    • 4.2Mitigating devices of request acts
  • 5.Conclusion and implications
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
References (38)
References
Al-Ali, Mohammed, and Rami Al-Alawneh. 2010. “Linguistic Mitigating Devices in American and Jordanian Students’ Requests.” Intercultural Pragmatics 7 (2): 311–339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Al-Ali, Mohammed, and Meera Sahawneh. 2008. “An Investigation into the Generic Features of American and Jordanian English Requestive E-mail Messages.” LSP and Professional Communication 8 (2): 40–65.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1989. “Playing it safe: The Role of Inconventionality in Indirectness.” In Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, ed. by Shoshana Bulm-Kulka, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper, 37–70. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper. 1989. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, and Elite Olshtain. 1984. “Requests and Apologies: A Cross-cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP).” Applied Linguistics 5 (3): 196–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, Guy. 1989. Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria. 2002. “Requesting Strategies in English and Greek: Observations from an Airline’s call Centre.” Nottingham Linguistic Circular 171: 17–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Etikan, Sulaiman, and Rukayya Alkassim. 2016. “Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling.” American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics 5 (1): 1–4. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Færch, Claus, and Gabriele Kasper. 1989. “Internal and External Modification in Interlanguage Request Realization”, In Cross-cultural Pragmatics, ed. by Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper, 221–247. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1980. “Conversational Mitigation.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 341–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geers, Ann, Johanna Nicholas, and Allison Sedey. 2003. “Language Skills of Children with Early Cochlear Implantation.” Ear and Hearing 24 (1 Suppl): 46S–58S. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
House, Juliane. 2005. “Politeness in Germany: Politeness in Germany?” In Politeness in Europe, ed. by Leo Hickey and Miranda Stewart, 13–25. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoza, Jack. 2007. It’s not what you Sign. It’s how you Sign it. Politeness in American Sign Language. Washington, D.C: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ibertsson, Tina, Kristina Hansson, Lena Asker-Arnason, and Brigitta Sahlen. 2009. “Speech Recognition, Working Memory and Conversation in Children with Cochlear Implants.” Deafness and Education International 111: 132–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele. 1997. “Can Pragmatics be Taught?” Plenary Talk given at the Annual TESOL Convention. Orlando, Florida.
. 2001. “Classroom Research on Interlanguage Pragmatics.” In Pragmatics in Language Teaching, ed. by Kenneth Rose and Gabriele Kasper, 33–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo. 2005. “Politeness in Estonia: A Matter of Fact Style.” In Politeness in Europe, ed. by Leo Hickey and Miranda Stewart, 203–217. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koike, Dale. 1994. “Negation in Spanish and English Suggestions and Requests: Mitigating Effects.” Journal of Pragmatics 211: 513–526. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marti, Leyla. 2006. “Indirectness and Politeness in Turkish–German Bilingual and Turkish Monolingual Requests.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (11): 1836–1869. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. “Speech Acts in Context”. In Context and Contexts: Parts Meet Whole? ed. by Anita Fetzer and Etsuko Oishi, 171–209. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mindess, Anna. 2006. Reading between the Signs: Intercultural Communication for Sign Language Interpreters. (2nd ed.). Boston: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nelson, Gayle, Joan Carson, Mahmoud Al-Batal and Waguida El Bakary. 2002. “Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Strategy Use in Egyptian Arabic and American English Refusals.” Applied Linguistics 23 (2): 163–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ogiermann, Eva. 2009. “Politeness and Indirectness Across Cultures: A Comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian Requests.” Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture 5 (2): 189–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paatsch, Louse, Peter Blamey, Julia Sarant, and Catherine Bow. 2006. “The Effects of Speech Production and Vocabulary Training on Different Components of Spoken Language Performance.” Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 111: 39–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pavlidou, Theodossia. 2000. “Telephone Conversations in Greek and German: Attending to the Relationship Aspect of Communication.” In Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk Across Cultures, ed. by Helen Spencer-Oatey, 121–140. London: Continuum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peccei, Jean. 1999. Pragmatics. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roever, Carsten. 2009. Teaching and Testing Pragmatics. Handbook of Language Teaching. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sifianou, Maria. 1999. Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece: A Cross-cultural Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Takahashi, Satomi. 2010. “Assessing Learnability in Second Language Pragmatics.” In Handbook of Pragmatics 71, ed. by Anna Trosborg, 391–421. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, Jenny. 1983. “Cross-cultural Pragmatic Failure.” Applied Linguistics 41: 91–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toe, Dianne, Rod Beattie, and Megan Barr. 2007. “The Development of Pragmatic Skills in Children who are Severely and Profoundly Deaf.” Deafness and Educational International 91: 101–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Usó-Juan, Esther, and Alicia Martínez-Flor. 2007. “Teaching Learners to Appropriately Mitigate Requests.” ELT Journal 62 (4): 349–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 2003. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction, (2nd ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, Kyonge. 2011. “Culture-specific Concepts of Politeness: Indirectness and Politeness in English, Hebrew, and Korean Requests.” Intercultural Pragmatics 8 (3): 385–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhu, Wuhan. 2012. “Polite Requestive Strategies in Emails: An Investigation of Pragmatic Competence of Chinese EFL Learners.” RELC Journal 43 (2): 217–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue