Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 12:2 (2021) ► pp.309–333

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

On the development of the social-linguistic nexus in discourse research

A critical review

 | University of Łódź
Published online: 3 June 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.19056.cap
Abstract
This paper gives a critical overview of analytical approaches dominating the field of discourse studies in the last three decades, from the perspective of their philosophical and formative bases: social constructionism and linguistics. It explores different conceptions of the theoretical nexus between these two bases leading to the emergence of three distinct yet complementary strands of thought (i–iii). The paper starts with poststructuralist views of discourse salient in (i) Laclau and Mouffe’s Discourse Theory. Laclau and Mouffe’s assumption that no discourse is a closed entity but rather transformed through contact with other discourses is taken as the introductory premise to present a large family of (ii) critical discourse studies, characterized as text-analytical practices explaining how discourse partakes in the production and negotiations of ideological meanings. Finally, the paper discusses (iii) three recent discourse analytical models: Discourse Space Theory, Critical Metaphor Analysis and the Legitimization-Proximization Model. These new theories take a further step toward consolidation of the social-theoretical and linguistic bases in contemporary discourse studies. The empirical benefits of this consolidation are discussed in the last part of the paper, which includes a case study where the new models are used in the analysis of Polish anti-immigration discourse.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Classical approaches: Laclau and Mouffe’s discourse theory
  • 3.Critical discourse studies
  • 4.Recent models in (critical) discourse studies
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (97)
References
Althusser, Louis. 1971. Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Angermuller, Johannes, Dominique Maingueneau & Ruth Wodak (eds). 2014. The Discourse Studies Reader. Main Currents in Theory and Analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Paul. 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Anthony McEnery & Ruth Wodak. 2008. A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society 191: 273–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination. Edited by M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua. 1954. Indexical expressions. Mind 631: 359–379. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bartlett, Tom. 2018. Positive discourse analysis. In John Flowerdew & John Richardson (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, 133–147. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benke, Gertraud. 2000. Diskursanalyse als sozialwissenschaftliche Untersuchungsmethode. SWS Rundschau 21: 140–162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale 1. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan & Chris Bulcaen. 2000. Critical Discourse Analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 291: 447–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1992. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: Fischer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2006. Legitimization in Political Discourse. Newcastle: CSP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017a. The Language of Fear: Communicating Threat in Public Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017b. From ‘cultural unbelonging’ to ‘terrorist risk’: communicating threat in the Polish anti-immigration discourse. Critical Discourse Studies 151: 285–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Missing links in mainstream CDA: modules, blends and the critical instinct. In Ruth Wodak & Paul Chilton (eds) A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis, 19–51. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Language, Space and Mind: The Conceptual Geometry of Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie & Norman Fairclough. 1999. Discourse in Late Modernity. Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1970. Structure, sign, and play in the discourse of the human sciences. In Richard Macksey & Eugenio Donato (eds) The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man, 247–272. Baltimore, Md.: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman & Ruth Wodak. 1997. Critical discourse analysis. In Teun van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction, 258–284. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2018. Discourse analysis. In Andreas H. Jucker, Klaus P. Schneider & Wolfram Bublitz (eds) Methods in Pragmatics (Handbooks of Pragmatics, Volume 10), 401–421. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flowerdew, John & John Richardson (eds). 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1971. L’ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1972. The Archeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. Translated by Andrew M. Sheridan. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger, Gunther Kress & Tony Trew. 1979. Language and Control. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger. 1991. Language in the News. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giltrow, Janet & Dieter Stein (eds). 2009. Genres in the Internet. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Golato, Andrea & Peter Golato. 2018. Ethnomethodology and conversation. In Andreas H. Jucker, Klaus P. Schneider & Wolfram Bublitz (eds) Methods in Pragmatics (Handbooks of Pragmatics, Volume 10), 380–399. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio. 1973. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994. Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, Allan & Andre Sonnichsen. 2014. Discourse, the political and the ontological dimension: an interview with Ernesto Laclau. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 151: 255–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2011. Moving beyond metaphor in the Cognitive Linguistic Approach to CDA: construal operations in immigration discourse. In Christopher Hart (ed.), Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, 171–192. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher & Piotr Cap (eds). 2014. Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hodge, Robert & Gunther Kress. 1993. Language as Ideology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob & Ngai-Ling Sum. 2018. Language and critique: some anticipations of critical discourse studies in Marx. Critical Discourse Studies 151: 325–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Marianne & Louise Phillips. 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaal, Bertie. 2015. How ‘real’ are time and space in politically motivated worldviews? Critical Discourse Studies 121: 330–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid & Johann Unger. 2016. Critical discourse studies and social media: power, resistance and critique in changing media ecologies. In Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd ed.), 205–233. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koller, Veronika. 2005. Critical discourse analysis and social cognition: evidence from business media discourse. Discourse & Society 161: 199–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kopytowska, Monika, Łukasz Grabowski & Julita Woźniak. 2017. Mobilizing against the Other: cyberhate, refugee crisis and proximization. In Monika Kopytowska (ed.) Contemporary Discourses of Hate and Radicalism across Space and Genres, 30–55, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał & Bernhard Forchtner. 2016. Theories and concepts in critical discourse studies: facing challenges, moving beyond foundations. Discourse & Society 271: 253–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 2007. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XVII: The Other Side of Psychoanalysis. Translated by Richard Grigg. London: Norton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 1990. New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. Power and representation. In Mark Poster (ed.) Politics, Theory and Contemporary Culture, 14–45. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. The death and resurrection of the theory of ideology. Journal of Political Ideologies 11: 201–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto & Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luke, Allan. 2002. Beyond science and ideological critique: Developments in critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 221: 96–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macgilchrist, Felicitas. 2014. Media discourse and de/coloniality. A post-foundational approach. In Christopher Hart & Piotr Cap (eds), Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, 385–405. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maingueneau, Dominique & Johannes Angermüller. 2007. Discourse analysis in France: a conversation. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 81, art. 21. [URL]
Marín Arrese, Juana. 2011. Effective vs. epistemic stance and subjectivity in political discourse: legitimising strategies and mystification of responsibility. In Christopher Hart (ed.) Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, 193–224. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James R. 2004. Positive discourse analysis: solidarity and change. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 491: 179–202.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & David Rose. 2003. Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, Anthony & Paul Baker (eds). 2015. Corpora and Discourse studies: Integrating Discourse and Corpora. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNair, Brian. 2011. An Introduction to Political Communication (5th ed.). London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. (ed.). 1993. The Return of the Political. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2004. Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Halloran, Kieran. 2010. How to use corpus linguistics in the study of media discourse. In Anne O’Keeffe & Michael McCarthy (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, 563–576. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. 2006. Metaphors, motifs, and similes across discourse types: corpus assisted discourse studies (CADS) at work. In Anatol Stefanowitsch & Stefan Gries (eds) Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, 267–304. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perrez, Julien & Min Reuchamps. 2015. Special issue on the political impact of metaphors. Metaphor and the Social World 51: 165–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin & Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sardinha, Tony B. 2011. Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1966. Course in General Linguistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1997. Whorf’s children: critical comments on critical discourse analysis. In Ann Ryan & Alison Wray (eds) Evolving Models of Language, 100–116. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Two quantitative methods of studying phraseology in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 71: 215–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Language corpora. In Alan Davies & Catherine Elder (eds) Handbook of Applied Linguistics, 106–132. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Charlotte & Anna Marchi (eds). 2018. Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tseronis, Assimakis & Charles Forceville (ed.). 2017. Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Unger, Johann. 2016. The interdisciplinarity of critical discourse studies research. Palgrave Communications 21: 15037. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 1999. Critical Discourse Analysis and Conversation Analysis. Discourse & Society 101: 459–470. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Discourse and Context: A Socio-Cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans & Rob Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Widdowson, Henry. 1998. The theory and practice of Critical Discourse Analysis. Applied Linguistics 191: 136–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2011. Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis. In Jan Zienkowski, Jan-Ola Ostman & Jef Verschueren (eds) Discursive Pragmatics, 50–70. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 2012. Critical Discourse Analysis (41 volumes). London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth & Michael Meyer (eds). 2016. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zienkowski, Jan, Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds). 2011. Discursive Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zinken, Jorg. 2007. Discourse metaphors: the link between figurative language and habitual analogies. Cognitive Linguistics 181: 445–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Wang, Jiayu & Yaru Zhao
2025. “Why does he appear so ordinary, but he can be so confident”. Pragmatics and Society 16:4 ► pp. 568 ff. DOI logo
Hu, Chajuan
2023. A corpus-based study on the cognitive construction of security in discourse. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Hu, Chajuan
2024. Modeling the audience’s perception of security in media discourse. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue