Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 14:1 (2023) ► pp.47–69

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

One issue, two genres

A comparison of interactional metadiscourse in the news

 | National Taiwan Ocean University
 | National Taiwan Ocean University
Published online: 14 March 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.19024.che
Abstract
This study compares the use of interactional metadiscourse in a British newspaper, the Daily Mail, and a British news magazine, The Economist, in reporting on the Brexit referendum. We adopted Hyland’s (. 2005a. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar: 48–54) framework to analyze hedges, boosters, attitude markers, engagements, and self-mentions. One hundred news articles were randomly selected from online archives from February to June in 2016, during which time the debatable issue was discussed ardently. Quantitative and qualitative results of this study revealed both similarities and differences between the newspaper and the news magazine in the use of interactional metadiscourse. For example, quantitatively, the frequencies of boosters in both genres were similar; however, the newspaper used much more engagement markers and self-mentions whereas the magazine used more hedges and attitude markers. Qualitatively, while most self-mentions were the same in both genres, a unique choice of self-mentions was found in the news magazine.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Purpose of the study and research questions
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Analytical framework of metadiscourse
    • 2.2Previous research on metadiscourse
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1The issue: The Brexit referendum
    • 3.2Data collection
    • 3.3Data analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Hedges
    • 4.2Boosters
    • 4.3Attitude markers
    • 4.4Engagement markers
    • 4.5Self-mentions
  • 5.Interactional metadisourse in journalistic genres
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (42)
References
Ahangari, Saeideh and Mozhgan Kazemi. 2014. “A content analysis of ‘Alice in Wonderland’ regarding metadiscourse elements.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English literature 31: 10–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alshahrani, Ali Ayed S. 2015. “A cross-linguistic analysis of interactive metadiscourse devices employment in native English and Arab ESL academic writings.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies 5, 8 (August): 1535–1542. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amiryousefi, Mohammad, and Abbas Eslami Rasekh. 2010. “Metadiscourse: Definitions, issues and its implications for English teachers.” English Language Teaching 3, 4 (December): 159–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anthony, Laurence. 2012. AntConc (Version 3.3.2) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Accessed November 30, 2017. [URL]
Audit Bureau of Circulation (ABC). n.d. “Who We Are.” Accessed April 8, 2017 [URL]
Boshrabadi, Abbas Mehrabi, Biria Reza and Zahra Zavari. 2014. “A Cross Cultural Analysis of Textual and Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers: The Case of Economic Articles in English and Persian Newspapers.” Advances in Language and Literary Studies 5, 2 (April): 59–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bunton, David. 1999. “The use of higher level metatext in PhD theses.” English for Specific Purposes 18, 1 (December): 41–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H. Herbert, and Richard J. Gerrig. 1990. “Quotations as demonstrations.” Language 66, 4 (December): 764–805. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crismore, Avon. 1989. Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Act. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crismore, Avon, and Rodney Farnswarth. 1990. “Metadiscourse in popular and professional science discourse.” In The writing scholar: Studies in academic discourse, ed. by Walter Nash, 118–136. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crismore, Avon, Raija Markkanen, and Margaret S. Steffensen. 1993. “Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students.” Written Communication 10,1 (January): 39–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dafouz Milne, Emma. 2003. “Metadiscourse revisited: a contrastive study of persuasive writing in professional discourse. Regreso al metadiscurso: estudio contrastivo de la persuasión en el discurso professional.” Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense 111 (January): 29–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 40,1 (January): 95–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farnia, Maryam and Nahid Mohammadi. 2018. “Cross-cultural analysis of interpersonal metadiscourse markers in persuasive local newspaper articles.” Discourse and Interaction 11,2: 27–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feng, Miao, Paul R. Brewer, and Barbara L. Ley. 2012. “Framing the Chinese baby formula scandal: A comparative analysis of US and Chinese news coverage.” Asian Journal of Communication 22, 3 (April): 253–269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fu, Xiaoli, and Ken Hyland. 2014. “Interaction in two journalistic genres: A study of interactional metadiscourse.” English Text Construction 7, 1 (January): 122–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuertes-Olivera, Pedro A., Marisol Velasco-Sacristán, Ascensión Arribas-Baño, and Eva Samaniego-Fernández. 2001. “Persuasion and advertising English: Metadiscourse in slogans and headlines.” Journal of Pragmatics 33,8 (August): 1291–1307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ho, Victor. 2016. “Discourse of persuasion: A preliminary study of the use of metadiscourse in policy documents.” Text and Talk 36, 1 (April): 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hu, Guangwei, and Feng Cao. 2011. “Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English-and Chinese-medium journals.” Journal of Pragmatics 43, 11 (September): 2795–2809. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2000. Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 13, 2 (June): 133–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005a. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005b. “Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse.” Discourse Studies 7, 2 (May): 173–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Applying a gloss: Exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse.” Applied Linguistics 28, 2 (June): 266–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jensen, Astrid. 2009. “Discourse strategies in professional e-mail negotiation: A case study.” English for Specific Purposes 28, 1 (January): 4–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Khedri, Mohsen, Chan Swee Heng, and Seyed Foad Ebrahimi. 2013. “An exploration of interactive metadiscourse markers in academic research article abstracts in two disciplines”. Discourse Studies 15, 3 (April): 319–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malenkina, Nadezhda, and Stanislav Ivanov. 2018. “A linguistic analysis of the official tourism websites of the seventeen Spanish autonomous communities.” Journal of Destination Marketing and Management 91: 204–233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James R., and Peter R. R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mu, Congjun. 2010. “A Contrastive analysis of metadiscourse in Chinese and English editorials.” Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice 41: 35–43.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mur-Dueñas, Pilar. 2010. Attitude markers in business management research articles: A crosscultural corpus-driven approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 20, 1 (February): 50–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sedaghat, Azam, Reza Biria, and Yaghoub Asadi Amirabadi. 2015. “Cross cultural analysis of hedges in Persian and English editorial columns.” International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World 8, 1 (January): 37–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suau-Jiménez, Francisca and Rosana Dolón-Herrero. 2007. “The importance of metadiscourse in the genre ‘promotion of touristic services and/or products’: differences in English and Spanish.” In Language for Specific Purposes: Searching for Common Solutions, ed. by Dita Gálová, 143–186. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sukma, Bayu Permana. 2017. “Interpersonal metadiscourse markers as persuasive strategies in Barack Obama’s 2012 campaign speeches.” Aksara 29, 2 (December): 283–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sukma, Bayu Permana, and Eva Tuckyta Sari Sujatna. 2014. “Interpersonal metadiscourse markers in opinion articles.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature 3, 2 (March): 16–21. . [06/04/17]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vande Kopple, William J. 1985. “Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse.” College Composition and Communication 36, 1 (February): 82–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vázquez-Orta, Ignacio, and Diana Giner. 2009. “Writing with conviction: The use of boosters in modelling persuasión in academic discourses.” Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 221 (November): 219–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vergaro, Carla. 2004. “Discourse strategies of Italian and English sales promotion letters.” English for Specific Purposes 231, 21: 181–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yagiz, Oktay, and Cuneyt Cuneyt. 2015. A comparative study of boosting in academic texts: A contrastive rhetoric. International Journal of English Linguistics 5, 4 (July): 12–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yazdani, Sara, Shahla Sharifi, and Mahmoud Elyassi. 2014a. “Interactional metadiscourse in English and Persian news articles about 9/11.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies 4, 2 (February): 428–434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014b. “Exploring hedges and boosters in 9/11 English front page news articles.” Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities 4, 3 (March): 301–313.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yazdani, Akram, and Hadi Salehi. 2017. “Comparing metadiscourse markers employed in English and Persian online headlines.” International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 6,4 (September): 91–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yeganeh, Maryam Tafaroji, Issa Mellati Heravi, and Abdolrasoul Sawari. 2015. “Hedge and booster in newspaper articles on Iran’s presidential election: A comparative study of English and Persian articles.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 1921 (June): 679–683. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Chang, Yu‐Yun
2025. Exploring Interactional Metadiscourse in Content Farms and Formal News Agencies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 35:2 ► pp. 852 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Songyun & Jiajin Xu
2024. Interdisciplinary variations of metadiscursive verb patterns in English research articles. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 603 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue