Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 13:4 (2022) ► pp.605–624
Kwame Nkrumah’s construction of ‘the African people’ via the Unite or Perish myth
A discourse-historical analysis of populist performance
Published online: 4 November 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.19023.nar
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.19023.nar
Abstract
Employing Wodak’s discourse-historical approach, this paper examines how Ghana’s independence leader – Kwame
Nkrumah – in his creation of the Unite or Perish myth constructed ‘the African people’ in a manner in sync with populist
performance. It argues that Nkrumah’s discourse, in its focus on the formation of a Union Government of Africa as the only means
of Africa’s peace, progress, security and survival in the post-independence era, can be characterized as a form of populist
rhetoric that presupposes an antagonistic relationship between two homogeneous social groups. To this end, the paper analyzes
three discursive strategies utilized by Nkrumah in promoting anti-establishment sentiments while celebrating or valorizing ‘the
ordinary people’: nomination and predication of social actors and actions, the construction of a man of the people image and the
exploitation of familiarity and historical memory. It concludes with a discussion on the implications of the study for political
discourse analysis in terms of the interrelationship between political myth and populist performance.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Context
- 3.The discourse-historical approach
- 4.Data
- 5.The Unite or Perish myth as a form of populist performance
- 5.1Nomination and predication of social actors and actions
- 5.2Construction of a man of the people image
- 5.3Exploitation of familiarity and historical memory
- 6.Conclusion
- Note
References
References (36)
Aslanidis, Paris. 2016. “Is
populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective”. Political
Studies 64(15): 88–104.
Bishop, Hywel and Adam Jaworski. 2003. “‘We
beat ‘em’: Nationalism and the hegemony of homogeneity in the British press reportage of Germany versus England during Euro
2000”. Discourse &
Society 14(3): 243–271.
Botwe-Asamoah, Kwame. 2005. Kwame
Nkrumah’s politico-cultural thought and policies. An African centered paradigm for the second phase of the African
revolution. New York & London: Routledge.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2005. Politicians
and rhetoric: The persuasive power of
metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
. 2014. Analyzing
political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
De Cleen, Benjamin and Yannis Stavrakakis. 2017. “Distinctions
and articulations: a discourse theoretical framework for the study of populism and
nationalism”. Javnost
Public, 1–19.
Demata, Massimiliano. 2017. “‘A
great and beautiful wall’. Donald Trump’s populist discourse on immigration”. Journal of
Language Aggression and
Conflict 5(2): 274–294.
Gastil, John. 1992. “Undemocratic
discourse: a review of theory and research on political discourse”. Discourse &
Society 3(4): 469–500.
Hawkins, Kirk. 2009. “Is
Chávez populist? Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective”. Comparative
Political
Studies 42(8): 1040–1067.
Hofstadter, Richard. 1966. The
paranoid style in American politics and other essays. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Kelsey, Darren. 2013. “The
myth of the ‘Blitz spirit’ in British newspaper responses to the July 7th bombings”. Social
Semiotics 23(1): 83–99.
Moffitt, Benjamin. 2016. The
global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Moffitt, Benjamin and Simon Tormey. 2014. “Rethinking
populism: Politics, mediatization and political style”. Political
Studies 621: 381–397.
Nartey, Mark. 2019. “‘We
must Unite now or Perish!’ Kwame Nkrumah’s creation of a mythic discourse?” Journal of Language
and
Politics 18(2): 252–271.
. 2020a. “Metaphor
and Kwame Nkrumah’s construction of the Unite or Perish myth: A discourse-mythological
analysis”. Social
Semiotics 30(5): 646–664.
. 2020b. Voice,
agency and identity: A positive discourse analysis of ‘resistance’ in the rhetoric of Kwame
Nkrumah. Language & Intercultural
Communication 20(2): 193–205.
Reisigl, Martin and Ruth Wodak. 2016. The
discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.), Methods
of Critical Discourse
Studies (pp. 23–26). London: Sage.
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse
and practice. New tools for critical discourse
analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wodak, Ruth. 2001. The
discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods
of critical discourse
studies (pp. 63–94). London: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth and Salomi Boukala. 2015. “European
identities and the revival of nationalism in the European Union: A discourse historical
approach”. Journal of Language and
Politics 14(1): 87–109.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Liang, Linlin, Hongli Wang & Wenshu Zhang
Nartey, Mark
Obeng, Samuel Gyasi & Akua Campbell
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
