Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 13:1 (2022) ► pp.1–21
Sociality and moral conflicts
Migrant stories of relational vulnerability
Published online: 21 March 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.19021.mar
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.19021.mar
Abstract
This paper explores how understandings of sociality influence the way members of two different social groups
discursively animate moral conflicts. It examines how moral conflicts are constructed in life-story interviews by Chinese and
Latin American migrants as they reflect on patterns of sociation with co-ethnics in London. These interviews typify the kind of
conflicts that emerged across a 102 interview database where a discrepancy between expectations of how contextually-situated
interpersonal relations are established and how they should unfold are. The transnational setting that we focus on inevitably
draws our attention to the importance of the larger relational context where interpersonal relations among migrant co-ethnics are
entrenched. In this context, rights and obligations towards one another are often reconfigured to adapt to the circumstances of
the new environment. This paper turns the pragmatic lens on transcultural relations.
Keywords: sociality, sociability, moral oughts, social oughts, Chinese, Latin American, (im)politeness
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Sociality and politeness
- 1.2Case study
- 2.Data and methodology
- 3.Analysis
- 3.1On the importance of pengyou ‘friend’ in Chinese
- 3.2On taking undue advantage
- 4.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (55)
Adler Lomnitz, Larissa. 1982. Informal exchange networks in formal systems: A theoretical model. American Anthropologist 90(1):45–56.
Algan, Yann, Christian Dustmann, Albrecht Glitz, and Alan Manning. 2010. The
Economic Situation of First and Second-generation Immigrants in France, Germany and the United
Kingdom. The Economic
Journal 120(542): 4–30.
Archer, L. and Kristine L. Fitch. 1994. Communication in Latin American multicultural organizations. In R. L. Wiseman and R. Shurer, eds. Communicating in multinational organizations. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 75–93.
Bergmann, Jörg. 1998. Introduction:
Morality in Discourse. Research on Language and Social
Interaction 31(3/4): 279–294.
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1997. Dinner
Talk: Cultural Patterns of Sociability and Socialization in Family Discourse. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Boyer, Paul. 1978. Urban
Masses and Moral Order in America, 1820–1920. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness:
Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Butler, Judith. 2012. Precarious
Life, Vulnerability, and the Ethics of Cohabitation. The Journal of Speculative
Philosophy 261: 134–151.
Census UK. 2011. [URL]
Conolly, Tim. 2012. Friendship
and filial piety: Relational ethics in Aristotle and early Confucianism. Journal of Chinese
Philosophy 39(1): 71–88.
Eble, Connie. 1996. Slang
& Sociability: In-group Language Among College Students. Chapell Hill: The University of North Caroline Press.
Fitch, Kristine. 1996. Text and context: A problematic distinction for ethnographers. Research on Language and Social Interaction 311:91–107.
Goffman, Erving. 1955. On
Face-Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements In Social
Interaction. Psychiatry 18(3): 213–231.
Ignatow, Gabe. 2009. Culture
and Embodied Cognition: Moral Discourses in Internet Support Groups for Overeaters. Social
Forces 88(1): 643–669.
Ingold, Tim. 2000. The
Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. New York and London: Routledge
Kádár, Dániel Z. 2017. Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual:
Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal
Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Rosina Márquez Reiter. 2015. (Im)politeness
and (im)morality: Insights from intervention, Journal of Politeness
Research 111: 239–260.
Ladegaard, Hans. 2017. The
Discourse of Powerlessness and Repression: Life Stories of Domestic Migrant Workers in Hong
Kong. London: Routledge.
. 2018. Codeswitching
and emotional alignment: Talking about abuse in domestic migrant worker returnee
narratives. Language in
Society 47:5 693–714.
Lorente, Beatriz. 2017. Scripts
of Servitude: Language, Labor migration and Transnational Domestic Workers. Clevedon, Buffalo and Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
Long, Nicholas and Henrietta Moore. 2013. ‘Introduction.
Sociality’s New Directions,’ in Sociality: New
Directions, ed. by Nicholas J. Long and Henrietta L. Moore, 1–24. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books
Luo, Yadong. 1997. Guanxi:
Principles, philosophies, and implications. Human Systems
Management 16(1): 43–51.
Márquez Reiter, Rosina. 2018. Interviews
as sites of ideological work, Spanish in
Context 151: 54–76.
Márquez Reiter, Rosina and Luisa Martín Rojo. 2015. The
dynamics of (im)mobility: (in)transient capitals and linguistic ideologies among Latin American migrants in London and
Madrid. In A Sociolinguistics of Diaspora: Latino Practices,
Identities and Ideologies, ed. by Rosina Márquez Reiter and Luisa Martín Rojo, 83–101. New York: Routledge.
Márquez Reiter, Rosina and Adriana Patiño-Santos. 2017. The
discursive construction of moral agents among Spanish-speaking Latin American retailers in Elephant &
Castle. Tilburg Papers in Cultural
Studies, 1941.
Márquez Reiter, Rosina and Adriana Patiño-Santos. 2021. The politics of comviviality: On the ground experiences from Spanish-speaking Latin Americans in Elephant & Castle. Journal of Sociolinguistics 251:662–681.
Massey, Douglas and Felipe García España. 1987. The
Social Proccess of International
Migration. Science 234 (4816): 733–738.
Nie, Norman. 2001. Sociability,
interpersonal relations, and the internet: Reconciling conflicting findings. American Behavioral Scientist 45(3): 420–435.
Ochs, Elinor, and Bambi B. Schieffelin. 2012. The
theory of language socialization. In The handbook of language
socialization. Edited by Alessandro Duranti, Elinor Ochs, and Bambi Schieffelin, 1–21. Malden, Mass: Wiley-Blackwell.
O’Rourke, James and Elizabeth Tuleja. 2009. Intercultural communication for business. Managerial Communication Series. Mason, Ohio: Cengage Learning.
Sifianou, Maria and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. 2018. Im/politeness
and globalisation. Journal of
Pragmatics, 1341 Special Issue.
Silverstein, Michael. 1992. The
Uses and Utility of Ideology: Some
Reflections. Pragmatics 2(3), 311–323.
Slugoski, Ben and William Turnbull. 1988. Cruel
to be kind and kind to be cruel: Sarcasm, banter and social relations. Journal of Language and
Social Psychology 71: 101–121.
Smith-Hefner, Nancy. 2007. Youth
Language, gaul sociability, and the new Indonesian middle class. Journal of
Linguistic
Anthropology 17(2): 184–203.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen (ed.) 2000. Culturally
Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Languages and
Cultures. London: Bloomsbury.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen and Dániel Kádár. 2016. The
Bases of (Im)Politeness Evaluations: Culture, The Moral Order and The East-West Debate. East
Asian Pragmatics 1(1).
Takahashi, Tomoko and Leslie Beebe. 1987. Development
of pragmatic competence by Japanese learners of English. The JALT
Journal 8(2): 131–155.
Thomas, Anthony E. 1976. Class and sociability among
urban workers: A study of the bar as social Club. Medical Anthropology: Cross-Cultural Studies
in Health and
Illness 2(4): 9–30.
Trinch, Shona. 2003. Latinas’
narratives of domestic abuse: Discrepant versions of violence. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Westoby, Peter and John Owen. 2010. The
Sociality Geometry of Community Development Practice. Community Development
Journal 45(1): 58–74.
Wutich, Amber. 2006. The Effects of Urban Water Scarcity on Sociability and Reciprocity in Cochabamba, Bolivia. Doctoral thesis, the University of Florida.
Yang, Mei-hui. 1994. Gifts,
favors, and banquets: The art of social relationships in China. Irhaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Zeyrek, Denis. 2001. Politeness
in Turkish and Its Linguistic Manifestations: A Sociocultural
Perspective. In Linguistic Politeness Across Boundaries: The case of
Greek and Turkish. Ed by A. Bayraktaroglu and M. Sifianou, 43–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Haugh, Michael, Dániel Z. Kádár & Rosina Márquez Reiter
Reiter, Rosina Márquez
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
