Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 12:4 (2021) ► pp.612–648

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

(Neo)liberalizing the state – Privatization of core government competencies

A CDA approach

 | University of Graz
Published online: 29 October 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.18078.sch
Abstract
For a few decades now and most prominently promoted by the US, neoliberal economics have been on the rise, epitomized in recent austerity policies with regard to countries that have met financial trouble. In particular the drive for privatization of core public services relating to basic human needs, such as water, social services or pensions, has been increasingly criticized because of a perceived incompatibility between the profit motive and social solidarity. This article uses a corpus-based analysis of the discourse on privatization in the US of proponents supporting, respectively opposing it, with an overall corpus size of about 230,000 tokens. It examines how the two groups conceptualize privatization differently and which strategies are applied to fore- or background particular aspects of it.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The privatization debate
  • 3.Research approach and methods
    • 3.1Approach
    • 3.2Corpora
    • 3.3Semantic profiling
    • 3.4Semantic profiles of select lexemes
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Semantic profiling
    • 4.2Semantic profiles of select lexemes
      • 4.2.1Conceptualization of money
        • 4.2.1.1Profit
        • 4.2.1.2Cost (pro: 379, anti: 313 tokens)
      • 4.2.2Conceptualization of solidarity
        • 4.2.2.1Help (pro: 74, anti: 73 tokens)
        • 4.2.2.2Support (pro: 85, anti: 136 tokens)
  • 5.Discussion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
References (36)
References
Buchheit, Paul. 2012, August 13. Five Ways Privatization Degrades America. Common Dreams. Retrieved from [URL]
. 2013, October 21. Privatization Benefits the 1%; Public Services Benefit Everyone. Truthout. Retrieved from [URL]
Carroll, William K. 2010. The making of a transnational capitalist class: Corporate power in the 21st century. London: Zed Books. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2017. Requiem for the American Dream. The 10 Principles of Concentration of Wealth and Power. New York: Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989/2015. Language and Power. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995/2010. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. 2nd ed. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. “The Case for Case.” In Universals in Linguistic Theory, ed. by Emmon Bach and Robert T. Harms, 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilroy, Leonard and Adrian Moore. 2010. Ten Principles of Privatization. Chicago: The Heartland Institute.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham, Philip. 2000. “Hypercapitalism: A political economy of informational idealism.” New Media and Society 2 (2): 131–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Hypercapitalism: New Media, Language and Social Perceptions of Value. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gray, John. 2010, January 7. “The Neoliberal State.” New Statesman. Retrieved from [URL]
Hardt-Mautner, Gerlinde. 1995. “‘Only Connect’: Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics.” UCREL Technical Paper 6. Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
In The Public Interest. 2013, December. “Out of Control: The Coast-to-Coast Failures of Outsourcing Public services to For-Profit Corporations.” In The Public Interest. Retrieved from [URL]
. 2016, September. “How Privatization Increases Inequality.” In The Public Interest. Retrieved from [URL]
Jessop, Bob. 2002. “Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Urban Governance: A State-Theoretical Perspective.” Antipode 34 (3): 452–472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Dave. 2011, November 17. “Privatization Nightmare: 5 Public Services That Should Never Be Handed Over to Greedy Corporations.” AlterNet. Retrieved from [URL]
Jones, Daniel S. 2012. Masters of the Universe: Hayek, Friedman, and the Birth of Neoliberal Politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamasa, Victoris. 2017. “Corpus Linguistics for Critical Discourse Analysis. What can we do better?” In Language, Corpora and Cognition, ed. Pjotr Pęzik and Jacek T. Waliński, 221–240. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kessler, Tim. 2003. “From social contract to private contracts: The privatisation of health, education and basic infrastructure.” Social Watch Report 2003. Retrieved from [URL]
Klein, Naomi. 2008. The Shock Doctrine. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marko, Georg. 2008. Penetrating Language – A Critical Discourse Analysis of Pornography. Tübingen: Narr Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “My Painful Self. Health Identity Construction in Discussion Forums on Headaches and Migraines.” Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik (AAA) 37 (2): 243–270.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Making informed healthy lifestyle choices. Analysing aspects of patient-centred and doctor-centred healthcare in self-help books on cardiovascular diseases.” In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015, ed. by Jesús Romero-Trillo, 65–88. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mautner, Gerlinde. 2009. “Checks and Balances: How Corpus Linguistics can Contribute to CDA.” In Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 122–143. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonald, Alyssa. 2010, September 13. “The NS Interview: Noam Chomsky.” The New Statesman. Retrieved from [URL]
McEnery, Tony and Andrew Wilson. 1996. Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip and Dieter Plehwe, eds. 2009. The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of Neoliberal Reason. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oxford Dictionaries. n.d. “Privatize.” Retrieved from [URL]
Peck, Jamie. 2013. Constructions of Neoliberal Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
PFAW. 2012. Predatory Privatization: Exploiting Financial Hardship, Enriching the 1 Percent, Undermining Democracy. Washington, D.C.: People for the American Way.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, Mike. 2016. WordSmith Tools version 7. Stroud, UK: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Springer, Simon. 2012. “Neoliberalism as discourse: between Foucauldian political economy and Marxian poststructuralism.” Critical Discourse Studies 9 (2): 133–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Springer, Simon, Kean Birch and Julie MacLeavy, eds. 2016. The Handbook of Neoliberalism. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu, Jiajin. n.d. “Log-likelihood ratio Calculator.” Excel spreadsheet. [Online] [URL] (3 April 2018).
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue