Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 13:4 (2022) ► pp.555–584

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Reduction in and out of context

 | Högskolan DalarnaFalun
Published online: 4 November 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.18076.whi
Abstract
This article investigates reduced language in academic textchat. Previous work has suggested that frequency and context play a role in whether items can be reduced. It is demonstrated that students reduce more depending on the pedagogical set-up of the course, in that more reduction took place when the teacher-less pre-seminars came early in the course. Also, it was clear that high frequency items are more subject to reduction. When the topic is clear, items salient in such a discussion can be reduced. Also, the linguistic context of a full form of an item means that subsequent mentions can be reduced. Technical items vary in their behavior, and can be reduced or not. Another main conclusion, though, is that individuals also vary, and, when the context allows for it, can choose to reduce or not.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Reduction processes
    • 2.2The context of reduction
  • 3.The dataset
  • 4.Amount of reduced forms
  • 5.High frequency items
  • 6.Low frequency items
  • 7.Technical terms
  • 8.Conclusion
  • References
References (22)
References
Al-Sa’di, Rami and Jihad M. Hamdan. (2005). Synchronous online chat in English: Computer-mediated communication. World Englishes 24(4): 409–424. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Androutsopolous, Jannis. 2000. Non-standard spellings in media texts: The case of German fanzines. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4(4): 514–533. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bieswanger, Mark. 2007. 2 abbrevi8 or not 2 abbrevi8: A contrastive analysis of different shortening strategies in English and German text messages. Texas Linguistic Forum 501. Available from: [URL]. Retrieved 5th March, 2014.
Crystal, David. (2008). Txting: The gr8 db8. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herring, Susan. 2012. Grammar and electronic communication. In Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ed. by Carol Chapelle, 2338–2346. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hård af Segerstad, Ylva. 2002. Use and adaptation of written language to the conditions of computer-mediated communication. PhD thesis, Göteborgs Universitet.
Kul, Malgorzata. 2007a. Metaphonology in text messages. In The Media and International Communication: Lodz Studies in Language 151, ed. by Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Tomasz Pludowski and Dolores Valencia Tanno, 429–442. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007b. Phonology in text messages. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 43(2): 43–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Carmen. 2002. Literacy practices in computer-mediated communication in Hong Kong. The Reading Matrix 2(2): 1–25.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López Rúa, Paula. 2005. Shortening devices in text messaging. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 106(2): 139–155.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lotherington, Heather and Yejun Xu. 2004. How to chat in English and Chinese: Emerging digital language conventions. ReCALL 16(2): 308–329. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murray, Denise. 2000. Protean communication: The language of computer-mediated communication. TESOL Quarterly 34(3): 397–421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagg, Caroline. (2016). Heteroglossia in text-messaging: Performing identity and negotiating relationships in a digital space. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(1), 59–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin. 2003. Generation txt? The sociolinguistics of young people’s text-messaging. Discourse Analysis Online 1, 11. Available from [URL]. Retrieved 10th November, 2013.
Werry, Christopher. 1996. Linguistic and interactional features of Internet Relay Chat. In Computer-mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-cultural Perspectives, ed. by Susan Herring, 47–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014b. The Pragmatics of Reduced Forms in an Internet Community of Practice. In Lodz Studies in Language 33: Cognitive and Pragmatics Aspects of Speech Actions, ed. by Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka, 167–183. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. Processes and Variations in Language Economisation. Ampersand 21: 72–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. Local Norms in CALL Language Practice. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Technology 6(1): 40–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. Exploration of Textual Interactions in CALL Learning Communities: Emerging Research and Opportunities. Hershey, Penn.: IGI Global. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018. Individual Variation in Reduction Processes in L2 English Academic Textchat. Ampersand 51: 18–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue