Cover not available

Article published In: Hate speech: Definitions, interpretations and practices
Edited by Fabienne H. Baider, Sharon Millar and Stavros Assimakopoulos
[Pragmatics and Society 11:2] 2020
► pp. 177–195

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Incitement to discriminatory hatred, illocution and perlocution

 | University of Malta
Published online: 13 July 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.18071.ass
Abstract
Even though there seem to be no objectively defined criteria about what constitutes hate speech, a lot of legislation and policy making currently aims at combating it. This paper sets out to define hate speech under its standard legal understanding of ‘incitement to discriminatory hatred’, by adopting a speech-act theoretic perspective. My main proposal is that the Austinian distinction between illocution and perlocution can be pivotal in this process, since hate speech may be an illocutionary act that is typically tied to the recognition of a speaker’s intention to incite discriminatory hatred, but one which can only be defined if one takes into account its speaker’s intended perlocutionary effects; that is, the intention of the speaker to trigger a particular kind of response from some audience. Against this backdrop, I turn to show how a reworked Searlean notion of felicity conditions can be usefully applied in the delineation of hate speech under this legal conception.
Article outline
  • 1.The elusiveness of hate speech
  • 2.Illocution, perlocution and the remit of hate speech law
  • 3.Defining hate speech under the incitement to discriminatory hatred criterion
  • 4.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (39)
References
Alkiviadou, Natalie. 2017. “Regulating Hate Speech in the EU.” In Online Hate Speech in the European Union: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective, ed. by Stavros Assimakopoulos, Fabienne Baider, and Sharon Millar, 6–10. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altman, Andrew. 1993. “Liberalism and Campus Hate Speech: A Philosophical Examination.” Ethics 103 (2): 302–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Assimakopoulos, Stavros, Fabienne Baider, and Sharon Millar (eds). 2017. Online Hate Speech in the European Union: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baider, Fabienne, Stavros Assimakopoulos, and Sharon Millar. 2017. “Hate Speech in the EU and the C.O.N.T.A.C.T. Project.” In Online Hate Speech in the European Union: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective, ed. by Stavros Assimakopoulos, Fabienne Baider, and Sharon Millar, 1–6. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Alexander. 2015. Hate Speech Law: A Philosophical Examination. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017a. “What Is Hate Speech? Part 1: The Myth of Hate.” Law and Philosophy 36 (4): 419–468. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017b. “What Is Hate Speech? Part 2: Family Resemblances.” Law and Philosophy 36 (5): 561–613. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1997. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cortese, Anthony. 2006. Opposing Hate Speech. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Council of the European Union. 2008. “Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA of 28 November 2008 on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law.” Official Journal of the European Union L 328/55. [URL]
Delgado, Richard, and Jean Stefancic. 2009. “Four Observations about Hate Speech.” Wake Forest Law Review 441: 353–370.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Devine, Patricia G., E. Ashby Plant, and Irene V. Blair. 2001. “Classic and Contemporary Analyses of Racial Prejudice.” In Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processes, ed. by Rupert Brown, and Sam Gaertner, 198–217. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dovidio, John F., and Samuel L. Gaertner. 1998. “On the Nature of Contemporary Prejudice: The Causes, Consequences, and Challenges of Aversive Racism.” In Confronting Racism: The Problem and the Response, ed. by Jennifer L. Eberhardt, and Susan T. Fiske, 3–32. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics (Vol. 3: Speech Acts), ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gu, Yueguo. 1993. “The Impasse of Perlocution.” Journal of Pragmatics 20 (5): 405–432. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer, and Rae Langton. 1998. “Free Speech and Illocution.” Legal Theory 4 (1): 21–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iganski, Paul. 1999. “Legislating Against Hate: Outlawing Racism and Antisemitism in Britain.” Critical Social Policy 19 (1): 129–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kurzon, Dennis. 1998. “The Speech Act Status of Incitement: Perlocutionary Acts Revisited.” Journal of Pragmatics 29 (5): 571–596. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langton, Rae. 1993. “Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 22 (4): 293–330.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Beyond Belief: Pragmatics in Hate Speech and Pornography.” In Speech and Harm: Controversies Over Free Speech, ed. by Ishani Maitra and Mary Kate McGowan, 72–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Hate Speech and the Epistemology of Justice.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (4): 865–873. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leets, Laura. 2003. “Disentangling Perceptions of Subtle Racist Speech: A Cultural Perspective.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 22 (2): 145–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Abigail. 2010. The Cost of Free Speech: Pornography, Hate Speech, and their Challenge to Liberalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGonagle, Tarlach. 2013. “The Council of Europe Against Online Hate Speech: Conundrums and Challenges.” Council of Europe Expert Paper. [URL]
McGowan, Mary Kate. 2009. “Oppressive Speech.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3): 389–407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petrova, Dimitrina. 2010. “‘Smoke and Mirrors’: The Durban Review Conference and Human Rights Politics at the United Nations.” Human Rights Law Review 10 (1): 129–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Post, Robert. 2009. “Hate Speech.” In Extreme Speech and Democracy, ed. by Ivan Hare and James Weinstein, 123–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sellars, Andrew F. 2016. “Defining Hate Speech.” Berkman Klein Center Research Publication No. 2016–20. Boston University School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 16–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. 1995. “An Analytical Map of Social Scientific Approaches to the Concept of Law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 15 (4): 501–535. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsesis, Alexander. 2013. “Inflammatory Hate Speech: Offense versus Incitement.” Minnesota Law Review 971: 101–152.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. 1966. “International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.” United Nations Treaty. [URL]
van Dijk, Teun A. 1995. “Ideological Discourse Analysis.” New Courant 41: 135–161.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2012. The Harm in Hate Speech. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weber, Anne. 2009. Manual on Hate Speech. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
West, Caroline. 2017. “Freedom of Expression and Derogatory Words.” In A Companion to Applied Philosophy, ed. by Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, Kimberley Brownlee, and David Coady. 236–252. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whillock, Rita Kirk, and David Slayden (eds). 1995. Hate Speech. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (22)

Cited by 22 other publications

Aguilera-Carnerero, Carmen, Matthias J. Becker & Marcus Scheiber
2025. 5. Same tools, different target. In Imagery of Hate Online, ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Assimakopoulos, Stavros & Dimitris Serafis
2025. Why soft hate speech matters: argumentativity and the dispersion of hatred towards minorities. Critical Discourse Studies ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Bennett, Samuel
2025. Soft hate speech and denial of racism at Euro 2020. Critical Discourse Studies ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Danziger, Roni
2025. Interpretive constructs: The case of incitement to violence and terror. Journal of Pragmatics 245 ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Mohammed, Dima
2025. Where the hate lies in soft hate speech: the argumentative potential in hostile public spheres. Critical Discourse Studies ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Panagaki, Nikoletta, Argiris Archakis & Villy Tsakona
2025. Exploring primary school immigrant students’ soft hate speech: evidence from Greece. Critical Discourse Studies ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Serafis, Dimitris & Janina Wildfeuer
2025. 9. Studying soft hate speech online. In Imagery of Hate Online, ► pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Wright, David
2025. The Importance of Context in Analysing the Incitement of Violence. In Manipulation, Influence and Deception, ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Zappettini, Franco
2025. Europhobia as a trajectory to hate speech normalisation? A diachronic analysis of Brexit media propaganda. Critical Discourse Studies ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Alcántara-Plá, Manuel
2024. Understanding emotions in hate speech: A methodology for discourse analysis. Discourse & Society 35:4 ► pp. 417 ff. DOI logo
Boukala, Salomi
2024. The Greek left-wing and the ‘Jewish problem’: analysing antizionism and antisemitism as forms of soft hate speech. Critical Discourse Studies ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Domínguez-Armas, Álvaro
2024. ‘Argumentative Disobedience’ as a Strategy to Confront Hate Speech. Argumentation 38:4 ► pp. 499 ff. DOI logo
Serafis, Dimitris & Stavros Assimakopoulos
2024. Zooming in on the study of soft hate speech: an introduction to this special issue. Critical Discourse Studies ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Serafis, Dimitris, Dionysios Mitropoulos & Salomi Boukala
2024. Endoxa, Regimes of Truth, and Hatred Rhetoric: Examining Golden Dawn’s Online Media Discourses. In Class, Culture, and the Media in Greece, Volume 1, ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Ermida, Isabel
2023. Distinguishing Online Hate Speech from Aggressive Speech: A Five-Factor Annotation Model. In Hate Speech in Social Media, ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Ermida, Isabel
2023. Building and Analysing an Online Hate Speech Corpus: The NETLANG Experience and Beyond. In Hate Speech in Social Media, ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Parvaresh, Vahid
2023. Covertly communicated hate speech: A corpus-assisted pragmatic study. Journal of Pragmatics 205 ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Serafis, Dimitris, Franco Zappettini & Stavros Assimakopoulos
2023. The Institutionalization of Hatred Politics in the Mediterranean: Studying Corpora of Online News Portals During the European ‘Refugee Crisis’. Topoi 42:2 ► pp. 651 ff. DOI logo
Vilar-Lluch, Sara
2023. Understanding and appraising ‘hate speech’. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 11:2 ► pp. 279 ff. DOI logo
Culpeper, Jonathan
2021. Impoliteness and hate speech: Compare and contrast. Journal of Pragmatics 179 ► pp. 4 ff. DOI logo
Rodney H. Jones
2021. Viral Discourse, DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2025. The Dark Side of Persuasion. In Manipulation, Influence and Deception, ► pp. 155 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue