Cover not available

Discussion published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 11:1 (2020) ► pp.149–163

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
FORUM

A cognitive-pragmatic study of non-scalar implicatures

 | Shandong University
 | Northeast Normal University
Published online: 30 March 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.18062.zha
Abstract
Whether or not non-entailment relations generate scalar implicatures is a cutting-edge issue in linguistic pragmatics. The present study intends to argue that, based on the Cognitive Grammar paradigm, non-scalar implicatures generated by non-entailment relations are manifested as cognitive defaults which are conventionally incorporated into symbolic units in schema-instance complexes. Conventions provide a shortcut for the hearer to infer non-scalar implicatures in an unconscious, effortless and automatic way. We maintain that, contrary to neo-Gricean pragmatics, non-entailment relations cannot generate (scalar) Q-implicatures.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Revising the Horn scales
  • 3.Cognitive pragmatics
  • 4.Defining non-entailment relations via the schema-instance relationship
  • 5.Non-scalar implicatures as cognitive defaults
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (19)
References
Evans, Vyvyan and Melanie Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamawand, Zeki. 2016. Semantics: A Cognitive Account of Linguistic Meaning. Sheffield: Equinox. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirschberg, Julia. 1991. A Theory of Scalar Implicature. New York: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence. 1984. “Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q- and R- based implicature”. In Meaning, Form, and Use in Context, ed. by D. Schiffrin, 11–42. Washington: Georgetown University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “WJ-40: Implicature, truth, and meaning”. International Review of Pragmatics 11: 3–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Yan. 2014. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaszczolt, Kasia. 2005. Default Semantics: Foundations of a Compositional Theory of Acts of Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. “An introduction to cognitive grammar”. Cognitive Sciences 101: 1–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “Discourse in cognitive grammar”. Cognitive Linguistics 12 (2): 143–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Récanati, François. 2004. Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2012. “Generalizing the apparently ungeneralizable. Basic ingredients of a cognitive-pragmatic approach to the construal of meaning-in-context”. In Cognitive Pragmatics, ed. by H. Schmid, 3–22. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, John. 2002. Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Shaojie and Yanfei Zhang. 2015. “Scalar implicature: A Saussurean system-based approach”. Language Sciences 511: 43–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Yanfei and Shaojie Zhang. 2017. “Explicature versus default meaning”. Journal of Pragmatics 1171: 264–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Liang, Nina, Yanfei Zhang & Yuan Zhang
2025. Delineating how PCIs develop into GCIs from a cognition-pragmatics diachronic perspective. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) DOI logo
Zhang, Yanfei, Nina Liang & Shaojie Zhang
2025. Scalar implicature. Pragmatics and Society 16:1 ► pp. 46 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue