Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 12:3 (2021) ► pp.349–372

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Disagreement realizations in Arabic

Evidence from the University of Jordan

 | University of Jordan
 | University of Jordan
Published online: 5 July 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.18006.ham
Abstract
This paper examines disagreement strategies employed by speakers of Jordanian Spoken Arabic (JSA) with a view to finding out whether variables like gender and social status affect the linguistic choices and disagreement strategies they employ. The subjects are 28 Jordanian Arabic-speaking students at the University of Jordan. The researchers analyze the students’ interactional recorded responses to a set of stimuli included in an oral (recorded) discourse completion task (ODCT) prepared for this purpose. The ODCT comprises six scenarios in which the respondent is requested to disagree with two peers, two higher-status interlocutors and two lower-status interlocutors. The findings show that male and female subjects’ disagreement strategies tend to be influenced by the topic under discussion rather than by the gender and status of their interlocutor. However, some topics are found to be more provocative to females than to males.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
  • 3.Results and discussion
    • 3.1Disagreement strategies
      • 3.1.1Non-confrontational disagreement strategies
      • 3.1.2Confrontational disagreement strategies
    • 3.2Status and the choice of disagreement strategy
      • 3.2.1Disagreement with equals
      • 3.2.2Disagreement with higher-status interlocutors
      • 3.2.3Disagreement with lower-status interlocutors
    • 3.3Gender and the choice of disagreement strategy
      • 3.3.1Gender and disagreement strategies in terms of word count
      • 3.3.2The role of gender in determining the preferred disagreement strategy
        • 3.3.2.1Disagreement with an equal status interlocutor
        • 3.3.2.2Disagreement with a higher status interlocutor
        • 3.3.2.3Disagreement with a lower status interlocutor
  • 4.Conclusions
  • References
References (19)
References
Abuarrah, Sufyan, Katja Lochtman, and Madeline Lutjerhams. 2013. “Cross Cultural Pragmatics Requests’ Use of Strategy and Level of Directness in Palestinian Arabic and British English.” An – Najah University Journal for Research 27 (5): 1109–1144.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Al-Gahtani, Saad, and Carsten Roever. 2015. “The Development of Requests by L2 Learners of Modern Standard Arabic: A Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Study.” Foreign Language Annuals 48 (4): 570–583. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Al-Issa, Ahmad. 1998. “Sociopragmatic Transfer in the Performance of Refusals by Jordanian EFL Learners: Evidence and Motivating Factors.” PhD diss., Indiana University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chojimah, Nurul. 2015. “Refusal and Politeness Strategies in Relation to Social Status: A Case of Face-threatening Act among Indonesian University Students.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies 5 (5): 906–918. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce, and William Nolen. 1981. “The Association of Deference with Linguistic Form.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 1981 (27): 93–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glaser, Karen. 2009. “Acquiring Pragmatic Competence in a Foreign Language – Mastering Dispreferred Speech Acts.” Topics in Linguistics (4): 50–57.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guodong, Liang, and Han Jing. 2005. “A Contrastive Study on Disagreement Strategies for Politeness between American English and Mandarin Chinese.” Asian EFL Journal 7 (10): 1–12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Istifçi, Ilknur, and Yunusemre Kampusü. 2009. “The Use of Apologies by EFL Learners.” English Language Teaching 2 (3): 15–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koczogh, Helga. 2012. “The Role of Gender in Verbal Disagreement: A Study of Disagreement Strategies Employed by Hungarian Undergraduate Students.” Gender Studies 11 (1): 233–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “The Development of a Taxonomy of Verbal Disagreements in the Light of the P-model.” In The Evidential Basis of Linguistic Argumentation, ed. by András Kertész and Csilla Rákosi, 133–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreutel, Karen. 2007. “I’m not Agree with you.” ESL Learners’ Expressions of Disagreement.” Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language 11 (3): 1–35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam. 2004. Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maiz-Arevalo, Carmen. 2014. “ Expressing disagreement in English as a Lingua Franca: Whose Pragmatic Rules?” Intercultural Pragmatics 11 (2): 199–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morkus, Nader. 2009. “The Realization of the Speech Act of Refusal in Egyptian Arabic by American Learners of Arabic as a Foreign Language.” PhD diss., University of South Florida.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muntigl, Peter, and William Turnbull. 1998. “Conversational Structure and Facework in Arguing.” Journal of Pragmatics 29 (3): 225–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1985. “Different Cultures, Different Languages, Different Speech Acts: Polish vs. English.” Journal of Pragmatics 9 (2): 145–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Hamdan, Hady J., Wael J. Hamdan, Nisreen Naji Al-Khawaldeh & Othman Khalid Al-Shboul
2024. Disagreement Strategies in the Discourse of American Speakers of Arabic. Languages 9:7 ► pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
Hamdan, Hady J., Hanan Al-Madanat & Wael Hamdan
2022. Connotations of Animal Metaphors in the Jordanian Context. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS 33:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue