Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 11:1 (2020) ► pp.24–44

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

What makes a good story?

Exemplification and explication of salient linguistic characteristics in a narrative preferred by the majority of a Danish population

 | Roskilde University
Published online: 30 March 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.17013.pet
Abstract
People do things with words, but words also touch people. Aiming to analyze socially preferable linguistic characteristics, the present study exemplifies and explicates the text-linguistically salient characteristics in a narrative most frequently evaluated as ‘appropriate’ by the majority of a Danish population. Asked what is appropriate or inappropriate in a narrative context, the background population repeatedly explained “coherence”, “fiction” and “details” as contextually appropriate (Appendix 1). Salient in the preferred narrative was the use of co-textual enhancement, in which one clause enhances the meaning of another one by qualifying it in various ways. In particular, meaning was enhanced by having cause and effect rationally explicated by subordinating specifications prompting coherence, cohesion, and details. Additionally, a considerable level of social realism was salient in this narrative, while the background population’s preference for fiction may allude to the socio-contextual recognizability that made the narrative easily imaginable as a possible world.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction and the larger context of the present study
  • 2.Empirical data
  • 3.Introduction to The Preferred Narrative: “coherence”, “fiction” and “details”
    • 3.1Causal meaning enhancement
  • 4.Reflections on the nature of causality: The difference that makes a difference?
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (29)
References
Albeck, Ulla. 1939. Dansk stilistik. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1958. Poetik. P. Helms (trans). Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beaugrande, Robert-Alain de, and Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler. 1981. Introduction to Text Linguistics. London & New York: Longman. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diderichsen, Paul. 1964. Sproget, virkeligheden, fantasien. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijk, Teun van, and Walter Kintsch. 1983. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun. 2013. “Phenomenology and experimental design: Toward a phenomenologically enlightened experimental science.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 101: 85–99.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. English Language Series. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar ed. by Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, Erik and Lars Heltoft. 2011. Grammatik over det danske sprog. Copenhagen: Det danske sprog og litteraturselskab.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. 1971. “Indeterminacy and the Reader’s Response in Prose Fiction”. In Aspects of Narrative. English Institute Essays, ed. by J. Hillis Miller, 1–45. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1975. Die Appellstruktur der Texte. Rezeptionsästhetik. Theorie und Praxis, ed. by Rainer Warning. 228–252. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lagerlöf, Selma. 1956. Gösta Berlings saga. I. Falbe-Hansen (trans). Copenhagen: Gyldendal. [1891].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lundquist, Lita. 2003a. “Tekstlingvistik”. In Sprog og Sprogbeskrivelse ed. by Michael Herslund and Bente Lihn Jensen, 227–254. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. “Tekstlingvistik: regelmæssigheder og love”. Hermes. Journal of Language and Communication in Business 1(8):85–96.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayer, Mercer. 1969. Frog – Where Are You? New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nølke, Henning. 2008. “Argumentationsanalyse. Grundtræk af en modulær sprogvidenskabelig tilgang”. Hermes. Tidsskrift for sprogforskning 211: 15–38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nølke, Henning & Michel Olsen. 2000. “Noter om lingvistisk og litterær polyfoni og MAIS hos Flaubert”. The Electronic Journal of Combinatories 21: 1–38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Onions, Charles T. 1974. The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology ed. by Charles Onions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parnas, Josef. 2012. “The core Gestalt of schizophrenia”. World Psychiatry 111: 67–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petersen, Charlotte. 2011. Attitude i sproget ved tidlige skizofrene tilstande. Empirisk undersøgelse af sprogbrugen hos prodromale, førstegangsindlagte og yngre patienter med flere indlæggelser Roskilde: Roskilde University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Exploring a lay Gestalt of schizophrenia? A Danish background population’s explanations on why and how first-episode schizophrenia patients’ narratives were intuitively sensed as contextually inappropriate”. Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology 5(2): 64–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (submitted 2018). Pragmatic meaning and pragmatic markers in early schizophrenia. An empirical study on social sensitivity to contextual inappropriateness in narratives from first episode schizophrenia patients and healthy controls.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skafte Jensen, Eva. 2006. “‘Egentlig’ og ‘faktisk’ og to slags spørgsmål polyfoniteoretisk anskuet”. Sproglig polyfoni. Arbejdspapirer 61: 27–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sass, Louis: Madness and Modernism. Insanity in the Light of Modern Art, Literature, and Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Therkelsen, Rita. 1995: “Tid og tempus”. In 5. møde om udforskningen af dansk sprog ed. by Mette Kunøe and Erik Vive Larsen. 266–277.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ulbæk, Ib. 2003. “Ikonicitet og plausibilitet i tekstforståelse”. In Copenhagen Working Papers in LSP. Tekster: struktur, forløb og forståelse. Tre tekst- og psykolingvistiske undersøgelser. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Urfer-Parnas, Annich, Erik L. Mortensen, and Josef Parnas. 2010. “Core of schizophrenia: Estrangement, dementia or neurocognitive disorder?”. Psychopathology 431:300–311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
WHO. 1994. ICD-10. Psykiske lidelser og adfærdsmæssige forstyrrelser. Klassifikation og dia-gnostiske kriterier. 1st edition (10th revision 2003). Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue