Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 10:4 (2019) ► pp.559–583

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Doing business and constructing identities through small talk in workplace instant messaging

 | Hong Kong Baptist University
Published online: 14 January 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.16064.mak
Abstract
This paper describes how bilingual colleagues living in Hong Kong make small talk in instant messaging to achieve various business-oriented goals and construct multiple identities in the discursive process. Guided by James Paul Gee’s revised framework of discourse analysis, the analyses evidenced that, overall, colleagues use small talk in instant messages to maintain minimal ties with distant partners, fill in silence during computer work, affect informal decision-making at work, and to diffuse useful surrounding information into business talk. These instances interplay with different affordances provided by the gadgets in the instant messenger interfaces. Such creative usage, together with the perceived nature of online interaction and instant messaging, results in multiple and turbulent identities circulating in the broader context of workplace discourse. The article concludes by arguing that computer-mediated communication has offered participants an emerging modus of interacting socially, beyond the physical and psychological constraints of time and space.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The small talk of colleagues in workplace interactions
    • 2.1Small talk in face-to-face workplace communication
    • 2.2Computer-mediated (workplace) communication
  • 3.Methodology and coding
  • 4.Analytical framework
  • 5.Data analysis
    • 5.1Substituting ritualistic offline small talk
    • 5.2Extending small talk parallel to core-business communication
    • 5.3Facilitating core-business talk
    • 5.4Making meandering social talk
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1How small talk progresses in workplace instant messaging
    • 6.2How small talk functions in workplace instant messaging
    • 6.3How small talk constructs identities in workplace instant messaging
  • 7.Conclusion: Small talk in workplace instant messaging as an emerging way of social interaction with colleagues
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (77)
References
Anandarajan, Murugan, Maliha Zaman, Qizhi Dai, and Bay Arinze. 2010. “Generation Y Adoption of Instant Messaging: An Examination of the Impact of Social Usefulness and Media Richness on Use Richness.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 53 (2): 132–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays (Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baron, Naomi S. 2004. “See you Online: Gender Issues in College Student Use of Instant Messaging.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23 (4): 397–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. “Discourse Structures in Instant Messaging: The Case of Utterance Breaks.” Language@Internet 71: article 4. Retrieved from [URL]
2013. “Instant Messaging.” In Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, ed. by Susan C. Herring, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen, 135–162. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barron, Anne, and Emily Black. 2015. Constructing Small Talk in Learner-Native Speaker Voice-Based Telecollaboration: A Focus on Topic Management and Backchanneling. System 481: 112–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barton, David, and Carmen Lee. 2013. Language Online: Investigating Digital Texts and Practices. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beinstein, Judith. 1975. “Conversations in Public Places.” Journal of Communication 25 (1): 85–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benwell, Bethan, and May McCreaddie. 2016. “Keeping ‘Small Talk’ Small in Health-Care Encounters: Negotiating the Boundaries between On- and Off-Task Talk.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (3): 258–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bezemer, Jeff, and Gunther Kress. 2008. “Writing in Multimodal Texts: A Social Semiotic Account of Designs for Learning.” Written Communication 25 (2): 166–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 2000. “Gossipy Events at Family Dinners: Negotiating Sociability, Presence and the Moral Order.” In Small Talk, ed. by Justine Coupland, 213–240. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, A. Frances, and Jane Webster. 2005. “Unintended Consequences of Emerging Communication Technologies: Instant Messaging in the Workplace.” Computers in Human Behavior 211: 85–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Winnie, and Martin Warren. 2005. “A Corpus-Driven Study of Disagreement in Hong Kong Business Discourse.” In Asian Business Discourse, ed. by Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini, and Maurizio Gotti, 241–270. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chung, Donghun, and Chang Soo Nam. 2007. “An Analysis of the Variables Predicting Instant Messenger Use.” New Media and Society 9 (2): 212–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clifton, Jonathan. 2012. “Doing Trust in Workplace Interaction.” In Professional Communication across Languages and Cultures, ed. by Mǎda Stanca, and Rǎzvan Sǎftoiu, 107–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 1988. “Gossip Revisited”. In Women in their Speech Communities: New Perspectives on Language and Sex, ed. by Jennifer Coates and Deborah Cameron, 94–122. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coposescu, Liliana T. 2012. “Discursive Hybridity at Work.” In Professional Communication across Languages and Cultures, ed. by Mǎda Stanca, and Rǎzvan Sǎftoiu, 83–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coupland, Justine. 2000. “Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Small Talk.” In Small Talk, ed. by Justine Coupland, 1–25. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. “Small Talk: Social Functions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 36 (1): 1–6. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coupland, Justine, Nikolas Coupland, and Jeffrey D. Robinson. 1992. “‘How are you?’: Negotiating Phatic Communion.” Language in Society 21 (2): 207–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2006. Language and the Internet (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cui, Xia. 2015. “Small Talk: A Missing Skill in the Chinese Communicative Repertoire.” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 38 (1): 3–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Darics, Erika. 2010. “Relational Work in Synchronous Text-Based CMC of Virtual Teams.” In Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, ed. by Rotimi Taiwo, 830–851. Hershey, Penn.: IGI Global. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 2015. Digital business discourse. London: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DiFonzo, Nicholas, Martin J. Bourgeois, Jerry Suls, Christopher Homan, Noah Stupak, Bernard P. Brooks, David S. Ross, and Prashant Bordia. 2013. “Rumor Clustering, Consensus, and Polarization: Dynamic Social Impact and Self-Organization of Hearsay.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 491: 378–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Kathy Chilton. 2000. “Calling just to Keep in Touch: Regular and Habitualised Telephone Calls as an Environment for Small Talk.” In Small Talk, ed. by Justine Coupland, 137–162. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage. 1992. “Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellwardt, Lea, Rafael Wittek, and Rudi Wielers. 2012. “Talking about the Boss: Effects of Generalized and Interpersonal Trust on Workplace Gossip.” Group and Organization Management 37 (4): 521–549. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gee, James P. 2011. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibson, James J. 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guo, Zixiu, Felix B. Tan, Tim Turner, and Huizhong Xu. 2008. “An Exploratory Investigation into Instant Messaging Preferences in Two Distinct Cultures.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 51 (4): 396–415. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 2000. “Who needs ‘identity’?” In Identity: A Reader, ed. by Paul du Gay, Jessica Evans, and Peter Redman, 15–30. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C. 1999. “Interaction Coherence in CMC.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 4 (4). Retrieved from [URL]
2010. “Computer-Mediated Conversation: Introduction and Overview.” Language@Internet, 71: article 2. Retrieved from [URL]
Holmes, Janet. 2000. “Doing Collegiality and Keeping Control at Work: Small Talk in Government Departments.” In Small Talk, ed. by Justine Coupland, 32–61. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “When Small talk is a Big Deal: Sociolinguistic Challenges in the Workplace.” In Second Language Needs Analysis, ed. by Michael H. Long, 344–372. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Workplace Narratives, Professional Identity and Relational Practice.” In Discourse and Identity, ed. by Anna de Fina, Deborah Schiffrin, and Michael Bamberg, 166–187. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Doing Discourse Analysis in Sociolinguistics.” In Research Methods in Sociolinguistics, ed. by Janet Holmes and Kirk Hazen, 177–193. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet, and Rose Fillary. 2000. “Handling Small Talk at Work: Challenges for Workers with Intellectual Disabilities.” International Journal of Disability, Develop and Education 47 (3): 273–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet, Sharon Marsden, and Meredith Marra. 2013. “Doing Listenership: One Aspect of Sociopragmatic Competence at Work.” Pragmatics and Society 4 (1): 26–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet, and Maria Stubbe. 2015. Power and Politeness in the Workplace: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Talk at Work (2nd ed.). London: Longman. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iversen, T. Buschmann, Line Melby, and Pieter Toussaint. 2013. “Instant Messaging at the Hospital: Supporting Articulation Work?” International Journal of Medical Informatics 821: 753–761. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Rodney H. 2004. “The Problem of Context in Computer-Mediated Communication.” In Discourse and Technology: Multimodal Discourse Analysis, ed. by Philip LeVine and Ron Scollon, 20–33. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. “Cyberspace and Physical Space: Attention Structures in Computer Mediated Communication.” In Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space, ed. by Adam Jaworski and Crispin Thurlow, 151–167. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiernan, Patrick. 2017. Language, Identity and Cycling in the New Media Age: Exploring Interpersonal Semiotics in Multimodal Media and Online Texts. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koester, Almut. 2010. Workplace Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kulkarni, Dipti. 2014. “Exploring Jakobson’s ‘Phatic Function’ in Instant Messaging Interactions.” Discourse and Communication 8 (2): 117–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladegaard, Hans J. 2011a. “‘Doing Power’ at Work: Responding to Male and Female Management Styles in a Global Business Corporation.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 4–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012b. “The Discourse of Powerlessness and Repression: Identity Construction in Domestic Helper Narratives.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 16 (4): 450–482. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazzaro-Salazar, Virginia M., Meredith Marra, Janet Holmes, and Bernadette Vine. 2015. “Doing Power and Negotiating through Disagreement in Public Meetings.” Pragmatics and Society 6 (3): 444–464. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mak, Chun Nam Bernie, and Hin Leung Chui. 2013. “A Cultural Approach to Small Talk: A Double-Edged Sword of Sociocultural Reality during Socialization into the Workplace.” Journal of Multicultural Discourses 8 (2): 118–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mak, Chun Nam Bernie, Hin Leung Chui, and Yiqi Liu. 2012. “Instant Messaging and Microblogging: Situated-Learning Platforms for Educationists and Workplace Mentors.” Social and Behavioral Sciences 511: 392–399.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mak, Chun Nam Bernie, and Carmen Lee. 2015. “Swearing is e-Business: Expletives in Instant Messaging in Hong Kong Workplaces.” In Digital Business Discourse, ed. by Erika Darics, 124–143. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1923. “The problem of meaning in primitives.” In The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism, ed. by Charles K. Ogden and Ivor A. Richards, 296–336. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michael. 2000. “Mutually Captive Audiences: Small Talk and the Genre of Close-Contact Service Encounters”. In Small Talk, ed. by Justine Coupland, 84–109. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nabeth, Thierry. 2009. “Social Web and Identity: A Likely Encounter.” Identity in the Information Society 2 (1): 1–5. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nardi, Bonnie, Steve Whittaker, and Erin Bradner. 2000. “Interaction and Outeraction: Instant messaging in Action.” In CSCW’00 Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 79–88. New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norman, Donald A. 1988. The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perry, Fred L. 2011. Research in Applied Linguistics: Becoming a Discerning Consumer (2nd ed.). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Provine, Robert R., Robert J. Spencer, and Darcy Mandell. 2007. “Emotional Expression Online: Emoticons Punctuate Website Text Messages.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 26 (3): 299–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quan-Haase, Anabel, Joseph Cothrel, and Barry Wellman. 2005. “Instant Messaging for Collaboration: A Case Study of a High-Tech Firm.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10 (4). Retrieved from [URL].
Ragan, Sandra L. 2000. “Sociable Talk in Women’s Health Care Contexts: Two Forms of Non-Medical Talk.” In Small Talk, ed. by Justine Coupland, 269–287. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ready, Douglas A. 2002. “How Storytelling Builds Next-Generation Leaders.” MIT Sloan Management Review 43 (4): 63–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richards, Keith. 2006. Language and Professional Identity: Aspects of Collaborative Interaction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosnow, Ralph L. 1977. “Gossip and Marketplace Psychology.” Journal of Communication 27 (1): 158–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sǎftoiu, Rǎzvan. 2012. “Small Talk – A Work of Frame.” In Professional Communication across Languages and Cultures, ed. by Mǎda Stanca and Rǎzvan Sǎftoiu, 213–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schnurr, Stephanie. 2013. Exploring Professional Communication: Language in Action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sheer, Vivian C. 2010. “Hong Kong Adolescents’ Use of MSN vs. ICQ for Developing Friendships Online: Considering Media Richness and Presentational Control.” Chinese Journal of Communication 3 (2): 223–240. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stephens, Keri K. 2008. “Optimizing Costs in Workplace Instant Messaging Use.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 51 (4): 369–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbe, Maria, Chris Lane, Jo Hilder, Elaine Vine, Bernadette Vine, Meredith Marra, Janet Holmes, and Ann Weatherall. 2003. “Multiple Discourse Analyses of Workplace Interaction.” Discourse Studies 5 (3): 351–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagg, Caroline. 2016. “Heteroglossia in Text-messaging: Performing Identity and Negotiating Relationships in a Digital Space”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20 (1): 59–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin. 2001. “The Internet and Language.” In The Concise Encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics, ed. by Rajend Mesthrie, 287–289. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tracy, Karen, and Julie M. Naughton. 2000. “Institutional Identity-Work: A Better Lens.” In Small Talk, ed. by Justine Coupland, 32–83. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valkenburg, Patti M., and Jochen Peter. 2009. “The Effects of Instant Messaging on the Quality of Adolescents’ Existing Friendships: A Longitudinal Study.” Journal of Communication 591: 79–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van De Mieroop, Dorien. 2016. “Small Talk in Interpreted Interactions in a Medical Setting.” Language and Intercultural Communication 16 (2): 292–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vine, Bernadette, Susan Kell, Meredith Marra, Janet Holmes. 2009. “Boundary-Marking Humour: Institutional, Gender and Ethnic Demarcation in the Workplace.” In Humor in Interaction, ed. by Neal R. Norrick and Delia Chiaro, 125–139. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yates, Lynda, and George Major. 2015. “‘Quick-Chatting’, ‘Smart Dogs’, and How to ‘Say without Saying’: Small talk and Pragmatic Learning in the Community”. System 481: 141–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Yu, Buqing & Dorien Van De Mieroop
2025. Disagreement in Chinese blue-collar workplace small talk: The role of assessments relating to regional knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics 241 ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Li, Jie & Yanling Lin
2023. Parentheses used as pragmatic strategies in Chinese online socialization. Pragmatics and Society 14:3 ► pp. 442 ff. DOI logo
Chui, Mike Hin Leung, Bernie Chun Nam Mak & Gary Cheng
2021. Exploring the Potential, Features, and Functions of Small Talk in Digital Distance Teaching on Zoom: A Mixed-Method Study by Quasi-experiment and Conversation Analysis. In Emerging Technologies for Education [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13089], ► pp. 364 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue