Cover not available

Article published In: Discourse approaches to evidentiality in Spanish
Edited by Marta Albelda Marco and María Estellés
[Pragmatics and Society 9:3] 2018
► pp. 340–355

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Special Issue Section

Does the source matter?

Specificity in reportative evidentiality in Spanish scientific discourse (1799–1920)

 | Val.Es.Co. Group (University of Valencia)
Published online: 28 June 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.16036.kot
Abstract
This article provides an insight into the expression of reportative evidentiality in Spanish scientific articles published between 1799 and 1920. Central to the discussion is the presence and specificity of sources in reportative constructions. While contemporary scientific discourse prioritizes the use of specific, reportative-quotative evidentials, this is not a constant feature of articles analyzed in this study. In order to trace this historical variation, we established a classification of reportative constructions according to the specificity of the evidence they convey and we conducted both qualitative and quantitative analyses. According to our results, different specificity patterns were prominent in different temporal stages of the period under review. We argue that this can be interpreted in light of the growth and changing practices of the scientific community.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Reportative evidentiality in scientific discourse
  • 3.Data and method
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1Category ‘specificity irrelevant’
    • 4.2Category ‘non-specific’
    • 4.3Category ‘semispecific’
    • 4.4Category ‘specific’
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (24)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2007. “Information Source and Evidentiality: What Can We Conclude?” Rivista di Linguistica 19 (1): 209–227.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Albelda Marco, Marta. 2015. Evidentiality in Non-Evidential Languages: Are There Evidentials in Spanish? Journal of Pragmatics 851: 135–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco. 2015. “On the Mitigating Function of Modality and Evidentiality. Evidence from English and Spanish Medical Research Papers.” Intercultural Pragmatics 12 (1): 33–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banks, David. 2008. Development of Scientific Writing: Linguistic Features and Historical Context. London: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1986. “Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing.” In: Evidentiality: the Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace L. Chafe and Johanna Nichols, 261–272. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corell Doménech, María Vicenta, and Víctor Navarro Brotons. 2004. “Prensa y periodismo científico en España.” In Doce Calas en la Historia de la Prensa Española Especializada, 53–83. Madrid: Asosiación de la Prensa de Guadalajara.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dehkordi, Mojdeh Ebrahimi, and Hamid Allami. 2012. “Evidentiality in Academic Writing”. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 2(9): 1895–1904. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele, and Elena Smirnova, 2010. “Introduction. Evidentiality in European Languages: The Lexical-Grammatical Distinction.” In Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, ed. by Gabriele Diewald and Elena Smirnova, 1–14. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gross, Alan G., Joseph E. Harmon, and Michael S. Reidy. 2002. Communicating Science. The Scientific Article from the 17th Century to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grossmann, Francis, and Agnès Tutin. 2010. “Evidential Markers in French Scientific Writing: The Case of French Verb voir . In Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, ed. by Gabriele Diewald and Elena Smirnova, 279–307. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2005. Metadiscourse. Exploring Interaction in Writing. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009a. “Writing in the Disciplines: Research Evidence for Specificity.” Taiwan International ESP Journal 1 (1): 5–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. Academic Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009c. “Corpus Informed Discourse Analysis: The Case of Academic Engagement.” In Academic Writing: At the Interface of Corpus and Discourse, ed. by Maggie Charles, Diane Pecorari, and Susan Hunston, 110–128. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kotwica, Dorota. 2015. “Evidential al parecer: Between the Physical and the Cognitive Meaning in Spanish Scientific Prose of the 18th, 19th and early 20th Centuries.” Journal of Pragmatics 851: 155–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kousantoni, Dimitra. 2004. “Attitude, Certainty and Allusions to Common Knowledge in Scientific Research Articles.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 31: 163–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lampert, Günther, and Martina Lampert. 2010. “Where Does Evidentiality Reside? Notes on (Alleged) Limiting Cases: Seem and Be Like .” STUF Language Typology and Universals 63 (4): 308–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López Piñero, José María (ed.). 1992. La Ciencia en la España del Siglo XIX. Madrid: Marcial Pons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McClellan, James E. 1979. “The Scientific Press in Transition: Rozier’s Journal and the Scientific Societies in the 1770s.” Annals of Science 36 (5): 425–449. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polo, Anna. 2012. “Evidencialidad y tiempos verbales en un corpus de manuales académicos.” Orillas 11: 1–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salager-Meyer, Françoise. 1999. “Referential Behaviour in Scientific Writing: a Diachronic Study (1810–1995).” English for Specific Purposes 18 (3): 279–305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, John M. (ed.). 1990 (2007, 13th ed). Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2001. “Evidentiality and Scientific Thought-Styles: English Medical Writing in Late Middle English and Early Modern English.” In Modality in Specialized Texts, Selected Papers of the 1st CERLIS Conference ed. by Maurizio Gotti and Marina Dossena, 21–52. Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt/M., New York, Oxford & Wien: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vernet Ginés, Juan. 1998 [1975]. Historia de la Ciencia Española. Barcelona: Alta Fulla.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Kotwica, Dorota & Marta Albelda Marco
2025. Degrees of disagreement and reliability of information sources in pro- and anti-vaccination comments on Facebook. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 13:1 ► pp. 100 ff. DOI logo
Llopis Cardona, Ana
2019. Continuidad discursiva y evidencialidad citativa en el marcador discursivopor su parte. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:1 ► pp. 54 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue