Cover not available

Article published In: Discourse approaches to evidentiality in Spanish
Edited by Marta Albelda Marco and María Estellés
[Pragmatics and Society 9:3] 2018
► pp. 402–428

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Special Issue Section

What genres tell us about evidentials and vice versa

A study of al parecer in Spanish parliamentary debates

 | University of Valencia
Published online: 28 June 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.16034.est
Abstract
The aim of this paper is twofold. First, it aims to delve into the influence of contextual discursive factors in determining the type of evidential chosen and the pragmatic functions developed by evidentials in Spanish parliamentary discourse; second, it shows how evidentials can also provide useful new insight on the genre. A corpus study has been carried out studying the Spanish evidential discourse marker al parecer in parliamentary debates. The analysis shows how real examples of al parecer hardly fit any category of evidentials posited previously; data also illustrates how factors such as the discursive role or the part of the parliamentary process do affect the meaning of al parecer and change the pragmatic nuances conveyed by the discourse marker.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The evidential discourse marker al parecer: Semantic and pragmatic approaches
    • 2.1Semantic aspects: The evidential basis of al parecer
    • 2.2Pragmatic aspects – linguistic variation of al parecer: Genres and contextual preferences
  • 3.Methodology: Corpus and selection of the examples
    • 3.1Corpus selection
    • 3.2Database
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1What parliamentary discourse can tell us about al parecer
      • a. Al parecer as a general indirect evidential
      • b. Al parecer as a reportative evidential
      • c. Al parecer as a non-firsthand evidential (Aikhenvald 2003)
      • d. Al parecer as a circumstantial evidential
      • e. Al parecer as a generic inferential
    • 4.2What al parecer can tell us about parliamentary discourse
      • 4.2.1Internal variables
      • 4.2.2External variables
      • 4.2.3External criteria, internal criteria: A cross comparison
  • 5.Taxonomical complexity of evidentials in parliamentary discourse
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (34)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2003. “Evidentiality in typological perspective”. In Studies in Evidentiality, ed. by Alexandra Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon, 1–31. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Albelda, Marta. 2008. Al parecer. In Diccionario de partículas discursivas del español, ed. by Antonio Briz et al. Available online at [URL].
. This volume. “Evidentials as a mark of genre: A study of four oral and written genres”.
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco. 2014. “Evidential and epistemic devices in English and Spanish medical, computing and legal scientific abstracts: A contrastive study”. In Abstracts in academic discourse: Variation and change, ed. by Marina Bondi and Rosa Lorés, 21–42. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blas-Arroyo, José Luis. 2002. “En los límites de la (des)cortesía formas atenuadas de la agresividad verbal en el debate político español”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 137–138: 181–204.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert. 2007. Epistemic Modality and Evidentiality in Spanish (semi)auxiliaries. A Cognitive-functional Approach. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “An interactional approach to evidential and epistemic adverbs in Spanish conversation”. In The linguistic realization of evidentiality in European Languages, 309–330, ed. by Gabriele Diewald and Elena Smirnova. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert, and Pedro Gras. 2015. “On the interactional dimension of evidentials: The case of the Spanish evidential discourse markers.” Discourse Studies 17(2): 141–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cock, Barbara. 2006. El discurso político entre oral y escrito. In Usos sociales del lenguaje y aspectos psicolingüísticos: perspectivas aplicadas, ed. by Joana Salazar, Marian Amengual, and Mari Juan, 123–130. Palma de Mallorca: Universitat de les Illes Balears.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. El debate parlamentario frente al lenguaje coloquial y al debate televisivo: una caracterización lingüística basada en el uso de la referencia de persona. In Retórica y política. Los discursos de la construcción de la sociedad, ed. by Emilio del Río et alii, 729–744. Logroño: Instituto de Estudios Riojanos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Haan, Ferdinand. 2001. “The place of inference within the evidential system”. International Journal of American Linguistics 671: 193–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Semantic distinctions of evidentiality”. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. by Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at [URL].
Estellés, Maria. In Press. “Evidential discourse markers in Spanish parliamentary debates. Change in their use as a reflection of a change in the genre (1977–2016)”.
Estellés, Maria, and Marta Albelda. 2014. “Intonation, evidentials and politeness in Spanish. A corpus analysis”. Journal of Politeness Research 10 (1): 29–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Evidencialidad, atenuación y descortesía en al parecer y por lo visto. Influencias del género discursivo”. In Gramática, semántica y pragmática de la evidencialidad, ed. by Bert Cornillie and Dámaso Izquierdo-Alegría. Navarra: EUNSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. In press. “On the dynamicity of evidential scales. Pragmatic indirectness in evidentiality as a rhetorical strategy in academic and political discourse”. In Evidentiality in Spanish: Explorations across Genres, ed. by Carolina Figuera Bates and Adrián Cabedo-Nebot. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Frawley, William. 1992. Linguistic Semantics. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuentes, Catalina. 2012. “Introducción a “Discurso parlamentario y género. Perspectivas de investigación”. Revista iberoamericana de discurso y sociedad 61: 1–4.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1982. “Evidentiality and epistemic space”. Studies in Language 6(2): 23–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González, Montserrat, Paolo Roseano, Joan Borràs and Pilar Prieto. In press. “Epistemic and evidential marking in discourse: effects of register and debatability”. Special Issue ‘Evidentiality’, ed. by Willem Adelaar and Monica Lau. Lingua (forthc.).
González Ramos, Elisa. 2005. “ Por lo visto y al parecer: comparación de dos locuciones modales epistémicas de evidencialidad en español actual. Interlingüística 16(1): 541–554.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 2006. “Parliamentary Discourses”. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 188–197, ed. by Keith Brown, 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kotwica, Dorota. 2013. “Los valores del significado de la partícula evidencial al parecer: la atenuación y el efecto de disociación”. In Estudios de lingüística: investigaciones, propuestas y aplicaciones, 403–410, ed. by Adrián Cabedo-Nebot, M. Aguilar-Ruiz & E. López-Navarro. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Evidential al parecer: Between the physical and the cognitive meaning in Spanish scientific prose of the 18th, 19th and early 20th centuries” Journal of Pragmatics 851: 155–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard Watts. 2005. “Politeness theory and relational work”. Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 9–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marcos, Mercedes. 2006. “Evidencialidad y género discursivo”. In Análisis del discurso: lengua, cultura, valores. Actas del I Congreso Internacional 11, ed. by Manuel Casado-Velarde, Ramón González Ruiz, María Victoria Romero Gualda. 579–592. Madrid: Arco.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martín-Zorraquino, María Antonia. 2010. “Las partículas discursivas en los diccionarios y los diccionarios de partículas discursivas (con referencia especial a desde luego/sin duda; por lo visto/al parecer)”. In Estudis de Lexicografia 2003–2005, ed. by Elisenda Bernal, Sergi Torner & Janet DeCesaris, 231–257. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martín-Zorraquino, María Antonia, and José Portolés. 1999. “Los marcadores del discurso”. In Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, ed. by Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte III, 4051–4214. RAE/Espasa Calpe: Madrid.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario. 2008. “Lexical vs. grammatical evidentiality in French and Italian”. Linguistics 46(5): 917–947. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina. 2008. “Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness and rudeness”. In Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 45–78. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn. 2010. “Hearsay in European languages: toward an interactive account of grammatical and lexical marking”. In Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, ed. by Gabriele Diewald and Elena Smirnova, 59–129. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Cestero Mancera, Ana María & Dorota Kotwica
2021. Si todos lo dicen, ¿será cierto? La evidencialidad de folclore o acervo común: de la teoría a la investigación sociopragmática. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 86 ► pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Albelda Marco, Marta
2020. On the Mitigating Function of the Spanish Evidential se ve que. Corpus Pragmatics 4:1 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Estellés Arguedas, Maria
2020. The Evolution of Parliamentary Debates in Light of the Evolution of Evidentials: Al Parecer and Por lo Visto in 40 Years of Parliamentary Proceedings from Spain. Corpus Pragmatics 4:1 ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Figueras Bates, Carolina & Dorota Kotwica
2020. Introduction: Evidentiality, Epistemicity and Mitigation in Spanish. Corpus Pragmatics 4:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kotwica, Dorota
2020. Mitigation and reinforcement in general knowledge expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 169 ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Kotwica, Dorota
2021. Uso y funciones de los «hashtags» evidenciales en Twitter. Rilce. Revista de Filología Hispánica 37:2 ► pp. 685 ff. DOI logo
Villalba Ibáñez, Cristina & Dorota Kotwica
2020. ‘Tell Us Only What You Know’: Evidentiality in the Discourse of Participants in Spanish Trials. Corpus Pragmatics 4:1 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Albelda Marco, Marta & Marlies Jansegers
2019. From visual perception to evidentiality: A functional empirical approach to se ve que in Spanish. Lingua 220 ► pp. 76 ff. DOI logo
Figueras Bates, Carolina
2019. Razonamiento y Vigilancia Epistémica: Una Explicación Relevantista de los Evidencialespor lo vistoyse ve que. Pragmática Sociocultural / Sociocultural Pragmatics 7:1 ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue