Cover not available

Review published In: Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 11:3 (2020) ► pp.489–494

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Book review

Mostafa Morady Moghaddam，The praxis of indirect reports: cognitive, sociopragmatic, and philosophical issues

Reviewed by
 | Jiangsu Normal University
Published online: 31 July 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.00032.wu
References (16)
References
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1973. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Ardis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capone, Alessandro, Ferenc Kiefer, and Franco Lo Piparo (eds.). 2016. Indirect Reports and Pragmatics: Interdisciplinary Studies. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capone, Alessandro. 2016. The Pragmatics of Indirect Reports: Socio-philosophical Considerations. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capone, Alessandro, Manuel García-Carpintero, and Alessandra Falzone (eds.). 2019. Indirect Reports and Pragmatics in the World Languages. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capone, Alessandro. 2019. Foreword. In The Praxis of Indirect Reports: Cognitive, Sociopragmatic, and Philosophical Issues, by Mostafa Morady Moghaddam, vii–viii. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2016. Impoliteness Strategies. In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society by Alessandro Capone and Jacob L. Mey (eds.), 421–445. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1979. Quotation. Theory and Decision, 111: 27–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1879. Begriffsschrift, A Formula Language, Modeled upon that for Arithmetic. In From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic 1879–1931 by Jean van Heijenoort (ed.), 1–82. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gignac, Alain. 2016. Enunciation, Personification, and Intertextuality. In Exploring Intertextuality: Diverse Strategies for New Testament Interpretation of Texts (B. J. Oropeza and Steve Moyise, eds.), 176–186. Eugene, Ore.: Wipf & Stock.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1956. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and Conversation. In Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 2003. On Language and Linguistics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiefer, Ferenc. 2016. Indirect and Direct Reports in Hungarian. In Indirect Reports and Pragmatics: Interdisciplinary Studies by Alessandro Capone, Ferenc Kiefer, and Franco Lo Piparo (eds.), 77–92. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Craig A. and Leslie D. Kirby. 2001. Toward Delivering on the Promise of Appraisal Theory. In Appraisal Processes in Emotion by Klaus R. Scherer, Angela Schorr, and Tom Johnstone (eds.), 121–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 2010. Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue