Article published In: Ideologies of politeness
Edited by Manfred Kienpointner
[Pragmatics 9:1] 1999
► pp. 155–161
Politeness and political correctness
Ideological implications
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 March 1999
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.9.1.08klo
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.9.1.08klo
References (10)
Ehlich, Konrad (1992): On the historicity of politeness. In: Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide, Konrad Ehrlich (ed.) (1992): Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, p. 71 – 108. BoP
Fraser, Bruce & William Nolen (1981): “The association defence with linguistic form.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 27, 93–109.
Janney, Richard W. and Arndt, Horst (1992): Intracultural tact versus intercultural tact. In: Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide, Konrad Ehrlich (ed.) (1992): Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, p 21–42
Watts, Richard J., (1992): Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behavior: Reconsidering claims for universality. In: Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide, Konrad Ehrlich (ed.) (1992): Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, p. 21–42. BoP.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Mowlabocus, Sharif
Nagy, Imola Katalin
Ilie, Cornelia
2018. Pragmatics vs rhetoric. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 85 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
