Cover not available

Article published In: Clinical interviews as verbal interactions
Edited by Michèle Grossen and Anne Salazar-Orvig
[Pragmatics 8:2] 1998
► pp. 167–183

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Interpreting and diverging in clinical interviews

Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 June 1998
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.8.2.03sal
References (37)
Aguttes, P. & A. Salazar Orvig (1986) Analyse du discours et toxicomanie. In C. Ferbos & A. Magoudi (eds.), Approche psychanalytique des toxicomanes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 213-241.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atkinson, J.M. & J. Heritage (1984) Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Apothéloz, D. & M. Grossen (1996) Dynamique conversationnelle dans un entretien psychothérapeutique. Interaction et cognitions 1.1: 115-149.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtine, M. (Volochinov, V.N.) (1977, 1st ed., 1920) Le marxisme et la philosophie du langage. Paris: Minuit, Le Sens Commun.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bange, P. (1983) Points de vue sur l’analyse conversationnelle. DRLAV 291: 1-28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conein, B. (1987) Quelques formes de l’interprétation de la conversation dans la conversation. Lexique 51: 37-64.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Gaulmyn, M.M. (1987a) Reformulation et planification métadiscursives. In J. Cosnier & C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni (eds.), Décrire la conversation. Lyon: Presses Unversitaires de Lyon, pp. 167-198.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1987b) Actes de reformulation et processus de reformulation. In P. Bange (ed.), L’analyse des interactions verbales. La dame de Caluire: Une consultation. Berne: Peter Lang, pp. 83-98.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ducrot, O. (1980) Analyse de textes et linguistique de l’énonciation, In O. Ducrot et al.. (1980) Les mots du discours. Paris: Minuit, pp. 7-56.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eco, U. (1992) Les limites de l’interprétation. Paris: Biblio essais, Le livre de poche.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
François, F. (1995) Organising principles, discourse mouvements and atmosphere in dialogue: A clinical interview between a psychiatrist and a patient. International Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics 11. 2 (31): 205-225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1990) (ed.) La communication inégale. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1993) Pratiques de l’oral, Dialogue, jeu et variations des figures du sens. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (unpublished manuscript) Interpréter l’interprétation: Quelques fils.
Freud, S. (1925, consulted ed. 1975) La dénégation. Paris: Coq Héron.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H.P. (1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol 3: Speech acts. New york: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grossen, M. (1996) Counselling and gatekeeping: Definitions of the problem and situation in a first therapeutic interview. Text 16.2: 161-198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grunig, B.N. & R. Grunig (1985) La fuite du sens. Paris: Hatier.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grunig, B.N. (1994) Pour une conception dynamique du contexte. La linguistique 31.2: 5-13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gülich, E. & T. Kotschi (1987) Les actes de reformulation dans la consultation “La dame de Caluire”. In P. Bange (ed.), L’analyse des interactions verbales. La dame de Caluire: Une consultation. Berne: Peter Lang, pp. 15-81.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1992) Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti and C. Goodwin, Rethinking context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 229-252.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1995) Mutual inferencing in conversation. In I. Marková, C.F. Graumann & K. Foppa (eds.), Mutualities in dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 101-123.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (1989) Le principe d’interprétation dialogique. Cahiers de Praxématique 1321: 43-59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, W. & D. Fanshel (1977) Therapeutic discourse. New York: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marková I. & K. Foppa (1990) The dynamics of dialogue. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991) Asymmetries in dialogue. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marková I., C.F. Graumann & K. Foppa K. (eds.) (1995) Mutualities in dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moeschler, J. (1989) La problématique des rPgles d’enchaînement et d’interprétation revisitée. In C. Rubattel (ed.), ModPles du discours. Berne: Peter Lang, pp. 61-84.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1996) Théorie pragmatique et pragmatique conversationnelle. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rommetveit, R. (1990) On axiomatic features of a dialogical approach to language and mind. In I. Marková & K. Foppa (eds.), The dynamics of dialogue. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 83-104.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roulet, E., A. Auchlin, J. Moeschler, C. Rubattel & M. Schelling (1985) L’articulation du français contemporain. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A. (1986) Analyse des stratégies langagiPres de patients psychotiques dans le dialogue et le monologue, Doctoral dissertation, University of Paris V.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1995) Misunderstandings and the construction of dialogue in a clinical interview. International Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics 11.2[31]: 227-247.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (in press) Espace discursif et interprétations dans le dialogue. Remarques B partir de l’analyse d’entretiens cliniques, In S. Cmejrkova et al.. Dialoganalyse VI. Tubingen: Niemeyer.
. (1997) Interprétations et temporalité de l’espace discursif. Paper presented at The XVIth International Conference of Linguistics. Paris, July 1997.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A. & C. Hudelot (1989) Enchaînements, continuités et déplacements dialogiques chez le jeune enfant. Verbum 12.1: 99-115.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trognon A. (1993) La négociation du sens dans l’interaction, In J.F. Halté (ed.), Inter-actions. Metz: Université de Metz, pp. 91-120.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Carcassonne, Marie
2023. Récits, dialogues et dialogisme à l’École. Nouveaux cahiers de la recherche en éducation 24:3 ► pp. 10 ff. DOI logo
Grossen, Michèle & Anne Salazar Orvig
2011. Third parties' voices in a therapeutic interview. Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies 31:1 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Salazar-Orvig, Anne & Michèle Grossen
2008. Le dialogisme dans l'entretien clinique. Langage et société n° 123:1 ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue