Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 7:2 (1997) ► pp.147–162

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

The semantics of coming and going

Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 June 1997
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.7.2.02god
References (29)
Fillmore, Charles J. (1966) D eictic categories in the semantics of come. Foundations of Language 21: 219-27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1975) Santa Cruz lectures on deixis 1971. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles (1983) How to know whether you’re coming or going. In G. Rauh [Ed.], Essays on Deixis. Tubigen: Narr, pp. 219-227.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gathercole, Virginia C. (1977) A study of the comings and goings of the speakers of four languages: Spanish, Japanese, English, and Turkish. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, vol 21: 61-94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff (1991) Testing the translatability of semantic primitives into an Australian Aboriginal language. Anthropological Linguistics 33.1: 31-56.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff and Anna Wierzbicka (Eds.) (1994) Semantic and Lexical Universals: Theory and empirical findings. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff (Ed.) (1997) Studies in the Syntax of Universal Semantic Primitives. Special Issue of Language Sciences 19(3). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(In Press, 1998) Semantic Analysis: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff and Anna Wierzbicka (Eds.) (Forthcoming) The Universal Syntax of Semantic Primes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jackendoff, Ray (1983) Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1990) Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996) Conceptual semantics and cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics 7.1: 93-129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1981) [1765] New Essays Concerning Human Understanding. Translated by Peter Remnant and Jonathon Bennet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locke, John (1976) [1690] An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Abridged and edited with an introduction by John W. Yolton. London: Everyman’s Library.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John (1977) Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, George A. and Philip N. Johnson-Laird (1976) Language and Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand (1917) M ysticism and logic and other essays. 2nd Edition. London: G eorge Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard (1988) Matter, Space and Motion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanwood, Ryo E. (1993) The hitchhiker’s guide to SHAKE, WAVE, SWING, and WAG. Working Papers in Linguistics, University of Hawai’i 22.2: 141-147.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard (1985) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen [Ed.], Language typology and syntactic description Vol III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 57-149.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tanz, Christine (1980) Studies in the Acquisition of Deictic Terms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna (1972) Semantic Primitives. Translated by Anna Wierzbicka and John Besemeres. Frankfurt: Athenäum.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1980) Lingua Mentalis: The Semantics of Natural Language. Sydney: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1988) The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991) Cross-cultural Pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  BoP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1992) Semantics, Culture, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996) Semantics, Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilkins, David P. and Deborah Hill (1995) When “go” means “come”: Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 6.2/3: 209-259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (16)

Cited by 16 other publications

Waliński, Jacek T.
2025. How Paths Come and Go: A Corpus-Based Study of Deictic Verbs in Fictive Motion. In Linguistics, Language Education, and Language Contact [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Domínguez Barragán, Sara
2024. Semantics and Syntax of Old English Motion Verbs. Journal of English Studies 22 ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Subiyanto, Agus, Nurhayati Nurhayati, M. Suryadi & Peter Suwarno
2024. Motion verbs related to Javanese traditional fishing activities: a natural semantic metalanguage approach. Cogent Arts & Humanities 11:1 DOI logo
Anderson, Carolyn Jane & Brian Dillon
2023. Grammatical Perspective-Taking in Comprehension and Production. Open Mind 7 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Antonopoulou, Eleni & Kiki Nikiforidou
2022. Deictic motion and the adoption of perspective in Greek. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 273 ff. DOI logo
YAYLAGÜL ÜSTÜNEL, Özen
2021. Türkçe gel- ve git- Fiillerinin Anlamı. Dil Araştırmaları 15:29 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Luraghi, Silvia
2020. From verb to New Event Marker. Studies in Language 44:4 ► pp. 788 ff. DOI logo
Abdulrahim, Dana
2019. go constructions in Modern Standard Arabic. Constructions and Frames 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Feiz, Parastou
2019. Beyond motion: ‘Come’ and ‘go’ in Persian oral narratives. Linguistics 57:3 ► pp. 577 ff. DOI logo
Jerono, Prisca
2019. Typology of motion events in Tugen. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 15:2 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Pederson, Eric
2017. Approaches to Motion Event Typology. In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology, ► pp. 574 ff. DOI logo
Mateo Mendaza, Raquel
2016. The Old English Exponent for the Semantic Prime MOVE*. Australian Journal of Linguistics 36:4 ► pp. 542 ff. DOI logo
Nuti, Andrea
2016. A matter of perspective. In Embodiment in Latin Semantics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 174], ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Ju, Bo Hyun & Ki-Seong Park
2011. A Study on the Aspects of Markedness in English Motion Verbs Come and Go. Linguistic Research 28:2 ► pp. 355 ff. DOI logo
Nakazawa, Tsuneko
2007. A Typology of the Ground of Deictic Motion Verbs As Path-Conflating Verbs: the Speaker, the Addressee, and Beyond. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 43:2 DOI logo
Essegbey, James
2004. Auxiliaries in serialising languages: on COME and GO verbs in Sranan and Ewe. Lingua 114:4 ► pp. 473 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue