Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 7:2 (1997) ► pp.125–146

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

A modular approach to discourse structures

Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 June 1997
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.7.2.01rou
References (52)
Auchlin, A. (1993) Au petit bonheur du bien dire: Note sur le traitement du “bien dire” en analyse du discours. Cahiers de praxématique 201: 45-64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berrendonner, A. (1983) ‘Connecteurs pragmatiques’ et anaphore. Cahiers de linguistique française 51: 215-246.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1990) Pour une macro-syntaxe. Travaux de linguistique 211: 25-36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1993) Périodes. In H. Parret (ed.), Temps et discours. Louvain: Presses universitaires, pp. 47-61.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, P. & S. Levinson (1987) Politeness. Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambride University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1995) Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferrari, A. & A. Auchlin (1995) Le point: Un signe de ponctualisation. Cahiers de linguistique française 171: 35-56.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filliettaz, L. (1996) Vers une approche interactionniste de la dimension référentielle du discours. Cahiers de linguistique française 181: 33-67.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fodor, J.A. (1983) The modularity of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garfield, J.L. (ed.) (1987) Modularity in knowledge representation and natural-language understanding. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghiglione & A. Trognon (1993) Où va la pragmatique?. Grenoble: Presses universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1983) The interaction order. American Sociological Review 481: 10-17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grobet, A. (1996) Phénomènes de continuité: Anaphoriques et traces de point d’ancrage. Cahiers de linguistique française 181: 69-93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (to appear) Le rôle des ponctuants dans le marquage des unités périodiques à la lumière d’un exemple tiré de Fin de partie de Samuel Beckett.
Kasher, A. (1991) On the pragmatic modules: A lecture. Journal of Pragmatics 161: 381-397.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (1990, 1992 et 1994) Les interactions verbales. Paris: Colin, 3 vol1.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mann, W.C. & S.A. Thompson (1988) Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 81: 243-281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moeschler, J. (1989) Modélisation du dialogue. Paris: Hermès.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Motsch, W. (1989) Dialog-Texte als modular organisierte Strukturen. Sprache und Pragmatik 111: 37-66.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1991) Anforderungen an eine modulare Textanalyse. Sprache und Pragmatik 241: 47-61.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Motsch, W., M. Reis, & I. Rosengren (1989) Zum Verhältnis von Satz und Text. Sprache und Pragmatik 111: 1-36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mulkay, M. (1985) Agreement and disagreement in conversations and letters. Text 51: 201-227.  BoP Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nølke, H. (1994) Linguistique modulaire. De la forme au sens. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pike, K.L. & E.G. Pike (1983) Text and tagmeme. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polanyi, L. (1988) A formal model of discourse structure. Journal of pragmatics 121: 601-638. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reichman, R. (1985) Getting computers to talk like you and me. Cambridge: The MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1986) Du texte à l’action, Essais d’herméneutique II. Paris: Seuil. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rossari, C. (1994) Les opérations de reformulation. Berne: Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roulet, E. (1987) L’intégration des mouvements discursifs et le rôle des connecteurs interactifs dans une approche dynamique de la construction du discours monologique. Modèles linguistiques 91: 19-31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1990) Et si, après tout, ce connecteur n’était pas un marqueur d’argument ou de prémisse impliquée. Cahiers de linguistique française 121: 329-343.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1991a) Vers une approche modulaire de l’analyse du discours. Cahiers de linguistique française 121: 53-81.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1991b) Vers une approche discursive de l’hétérogénéité discursive. Etudes de linguistique appliquée 831: 117-130.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1992) On the structure of conversation as negociation. In J.R. Searle & al., (On) Searle on conversation. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins, pp. 91-99.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1994) La phrase: Unité de langue ou unité de discours? In J. Cerquiglini-Toulet & O. Collet (eds), Mélanges de philologie et de littérature médiévales offerts à Michel Burger. Genève: Droz, pp. 101-110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1995) L’analyse du dialogue dans une approche modulaire des structures du discours: L’exemple du dialogue romanesque. In F. Hundsnurscher & E. Weigand (eds), Future perspectives of dialogue analysis. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 1-34.  BoP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1996) Une description modulaire de l’organisation topicale d’un fragment d’entretien. Cahiers de linguistique française 181: 11-32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1997a) Dialogism and modularity: The topical organization of dialogues. In Cmerjkova. S et al.. (eds), Dialoganalyse VI. Referate der 6. Arbeitstagung, Prag 1996. Tubingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1997b) Polyphony. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman & J. Blommaert (eds), Handbook of pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1997c) L’analyse du dialogue comme forme et comme activité discursives. In Actes du colloque sur le Dialogique. Berne: Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. et al.. (1985) L’articulation du discours en français contemporain. Bern: Lang. 3rd ed. 1991.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rubattel, C. (1990) Polyphonie et modularité. Cahiers de linguistique française 111: 297-310.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sabah, G. (1989) L’intelligence artificielle et le langage, vol. 2: Processus de compréhension. Paris: Hermès.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1994) Approaches to discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J.R. (1992) Conversation. Conversation reconsidered. In J.R Searle et al.., (On) Searle on Conversation, Amsterdam: J. Benjamins, pp. 8-29, 137-147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon, H.A. (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 1061: 467-482.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanderveken, D. (1992) La théorie des actes de discours et l’analyse de la conversation. Cahiers de linguistique française 131: 9-61.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Viehweger, D. (1989) Coherence – Interaction of modules. In W. Heydrich & al. (eds), Connexity and Coherence. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 256-274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Violi, P. (1985) Letters. In T.A. van Dijk (ed), Discourse and literature. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins, pp. 149-167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walther, C. (1997) Modularity and natural language parsing. Geneva: Editions systèmes et information.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Grisot, Cristina
2017. Temporal Coherence in Discourse: Theory and Application for Machine Translation. In Formal Models in the Study of Language, ► pp. 355 ff. DOI logo
Fuentes-Rodríguez, Catalina
2016. Intensification, identity and gender in the Andalusian Parliament. In A Gender-based Approach to Parliamentary Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 68], ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Álvarez-Benito, Gloria & Catalina Fuentes-Rodríguez
2016. Introduction. In A Gender-based Approach to Parliamentary Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 68], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Domenec, Fanny
2012. The “greening” of the annual letters published by Exxon, Chevron and BP between 2003 and 2009. Journal of Communication Management 16:3 ► pp. 296 ff. DOI logo
Kotschi, T.
2006. Information Structure in Spoken Discourse. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 677 ff. DOI logo
Filliettaz, Laurent & Eddy Roulet
2002. The Geneva Model of discourse analysis: an interactionist and modular approach to discourse organization. Discourse Studies 4:3 ► pp. 369 ff. DOI logo
Grobet, Anne
2002. Références bibliographiques. In L’identification des topiques dans les dialogues [Champs linguistiques, ], ► pp. 393 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue