Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 6:2 (1996) ► pp.191–204

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Insinuating

The seduction of unsaying

Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 June 1996
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.6.2.04ber
References (19)
Austin, J.L. (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bach, K. (1994) Conversational Impliciture. Mind 91: 125-162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bach, K. and M. Harnish (1979) Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertuccclli Papi, M. (1996) Implicit meaning between implicature and explicature. In A. Johnson et al.. (eds.), Lo spazio della conversazione. Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertuccelli Papi, M. (in print) Referenza e allusione. Atti del Convegno “Scienza e immaginario”, Pisa 1995.
Bertuccelli Papi, M. and C. Perfetti (1987) Pragmatics and language rehabilitation, in J. Verschueren and M. Bertuccelli Papi (eds.), The pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blakemore, D. (1987) Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Basil Blackwcll.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, R. (1988) Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics. In R. Kempson (ed.), Mental Representation: The Interface between Language and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 155-181.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coulthard, M. (1977), 4« Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doherty, M. (1986) Epistemische Bedeutung. Studia Grammatica. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H.P. (1989) Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiefer, F.(1987) On Defining Modality. Folia Linguistica XXI1: 68-94.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parret, H. (1993) Indirection, manipulation and seduction in discourse. In H. Parret (ed.), Pretending to Communicate. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Récanati, F. (1989) The pragmatics of what is said. Mind and language 41: 294-328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and D. Wilson (1986) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993) Rhetoric and relevance. In J. Bender and D. Wellbery (eds.), The Ends of Rhetoric. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verschueren, J. (1995) The pragmatic return to meaning. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 5.2: 127-156.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Warren, M. (1982) Inexplicitness. A feature of naturalness in conversation. In M. Baker et al.. (eds.), Text and technology’: In honour of John Sinclair. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Widdowson, H.G. (1982) Othello in person. In R. Carter (ed.), Language and Literature. London: Allen and Unwin, pp. 41-54.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Bertuccelli Papi, Marcella
1999. Implicitness. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue