Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 27:4 (2017) ► pp.479–506

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

The use of discourse markers but and so by native English speakers and Chinese speakers of English

 | Nankai University, China
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 3 November 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.4.01liu
Abstract
Previous studies have found that but and so occur frequently in native and non-native English speakers’ speech and that they are easy to acquire by non-native English speakers. The current study compared ideational and pragmatic functions of but and so by native and non-native speakers of English. Data for the study were gathered using individual sociolinguistic interviews with five native English speakers and ten L1 Chinese speakers. The results suggest that even though the Chinese speakers of English acquired the ideational functions of but and so as well as the native English speakers, they underused the pragmatic functions of them. The findings indicate that there is still a gap between native and non-native English speakers in communicative competence in the use of but and so. The present study also suggests that speakers’ L1 (Mandarin Chinese) and overall oral proficiency in oral discourse affect their use of but and so.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Discourse markers
  • 2.Analytical framework of the study
  • 3.Literature review
    • 3.1Communicative competence and L2 DMs
    • 3.2Previous studies on ‘but’ and ‘so’ by L2 learners
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2Data collection
  • 5.Discourse marker categorization
    • 5.1Categorizing ‘but’
    • 5.2Categorizing danshi ‘but’
    • 5.3Categorizing ‘so’
    • 5.4Categorizing suoyi ‘so’
    • 5.5An overview of qualitative results
  • 6.Statistical evidence on the use of discourse markers
    • 6.1Statistical findings by English and Chinese speakers
    • 6.2Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (47)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 1997. “ I think: An English Modal Particle.” In Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspective, ed. by Toril Swan, and Olaf Jansen Westvik, 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Pragmatic Markers in Spoken Interlanguage.” Nordic Journal of English Studies 31: 173–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “ Well I’m not sure I think… The Use of Well by Non-Native Speakers.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 161: 231–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bachman, Lyle F. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bachman, Lyle F., and Adrian S. Palmer. 2010. Language Assessment in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Nicole, and Juliane House. 2010. “ I think and I don’t know in English as Lingua Franca and Native English Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 421: 1184–1200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1988. “‘So’ as a Constraint on Relevance.” In Mental Representations: The Interface Between Language and Reality, ed. by Ruth M. Kempson, 183–195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buysse, Lieven. 2012. “ So as a Multifunctional Discourse Marker in Native and Learner Speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 1764–1782. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Canale, Michael, and Merrill Swain. 1980. “Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing.” Applied Linguistics 11: 1–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fang, Mei. 2000. “Ziran kouyu zhong ruohua lianci de huayu biaoji gongneng [Reduced conjunctions as discourse markers]”. Zhongguo Yuwen [Chinese language] 51: 459–470.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frank-Job, Barbara. 2006. “A Dynamic – Interactional Approach to Discourse Markers.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles, ed. by Kerstin Fischer, 395–413. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fung, Loretta. 2011. “Discourse Markers in the ESL Classroom: A Survey of Teachers’ Attitudes.” Asian EFL Journal 131: 199–248.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fung, Loretta, and Ronald Carter. 2007. “Discourse Markers and Spoken English: Native and Learner Use in Pedagogic Settings.” Applied Linguistics 281: 410–439.Emerald Group Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1970. “Language Structure and Language Function.” In New Horizons in Linguistics, ed. by John Lyons, 140–165. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 2008. Particles at the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface: Synchronic and Diachronic Issues. Bingley: Emerald Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hays, Paul R. 1992. “Discourse Markers and L2 Acquisition.” Papers in Applied Linguistics-Michigan 71: 24–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
He, Anping, and Manfei Xu. 2003. “Zhongguo daxuesheng yingyu kouyu small words de yanjiu [Small words in Chinese EFL learners’ spoken English].” Waiyu Jiaoxue Yu Yanjiu [Foreign language teaching and research] 351: 446–452.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hedge, Tricia. 2000. Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2013. “On Discourse Markers: Grammaticalization, Pragmaticalization, or Something Else?” Linguistics 511: 1205–1247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1972. “On Communicative Competence.” In Sociolinguistics, ed. by John B. Pride, and Janet Holmes, 269–293. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Christian, and Ronald Carter. 2014. “Teaching Spoken Discourse Markers Explicitly: A Comparison of III and PPP.” International Journal of English Studies 141: 37–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 1993. “The Discourse Marker Well: A Relevance-Theoretical Account.” Journal of Pragmatics 191: 435–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Sara W. Smith. 1998. “ And People Just you Know like ‘Wow’: Discourse Markers as Negotiating Strategies.” In Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Yael Ziv, 171–201. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Yael Ziv (eds). 1998. Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lam, Phoenix W. Y. 2010. “The Effect of Text Type on the Use of So as a Discourse Particle.” Discourse Studies 111: 353–372. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Charles. N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liao, Silvie. 2009. “Variation in the Use of Discourse Markers by Chinese Teaching Assistants in the US.” Journal of Pragmatics 411: 1313–1328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Binmei. 2009. Discourse Marker Use by L1 Chinese EFL Speakers. The University of Florida Ph.D. Thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miracle, W. Charles. 1991. Discourse Markers in Mandarin Chinese. The Ohio State University Ph.D. Thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moreno, Ángela Eugenia Iglesias. 2001. “Native-Speaker – Non-Native Speaker Interaction: The Use of Discourse Markers.” ELLA 21: 129–142.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Simore. 2004. “‘Well you Know that Type of Person’: Functions of Well in the Speech of American and German Students.” Journal of Pragmatics 361: 1157–1182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. 2001. “Discourse Markers in Oral Narrative.” Journal of pragmatics 331: 49–878. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ostman, Jan Ola. 1982. “The Symbiotic Relationship between Pragmatic Particles and Impromptu Speech.” In Impromptu Speech: A Symposium, ed. by Nils Enkvist, 147–177. Abo, Finland: Abo Akademi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Redeker, Gisela. 1991. “Linguistic Markers of Discourse Structure.” Linguistics 291: 1139–1172.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence. 1999. “Tutorial Overview: Discourse Markers.” Lingua 1071: 227–265. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita. 1994. An Introduction to Spoken Interaction. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsai, Pei-Shu, and Wo-Hsin Chu. 2015. “The Use of Discourse Markers among Mandarin Chinese Teachers, and Chinese as a Second Language and Chinese as a Foreign Language Learners.” Applied Linguistics: amv057. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wei, Ming. 2011a. “Investigating the Oral Proficiency of English Learners in China: A Comparative Study of the Use of Pragmatic Markers.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 3455–3472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. “A Comparative Study of the Oral Proficiency of Chinese Learners of English across Task Functions: A Discourse Marker Perspective.” Foreign Language Annals 441: 674–691. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoshimi, Dina Rudolph. 2001. “Explicit Instruction and JFL Learners’ Use of Interactional Discourse Markers.” In Pragmatics in Language Teaching, ed. by Kenneth R. Rose, and Gabriele Kasper, 223–244. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Fu, Yanli
2024. A Comparative Analysis of the Use of the Discourse Marker “But” in a British Televised Political Interview Show: A Socio-Pragmatic Perspective. Corpus-based Studies across Humanities 2:2 ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Aoran & Qinxue Li
2023. Effect of task type on the use of discourse markers in L2 Portuguese by L1 Chinese learners. Diacrítica 36:2 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Algouzi, Sami & Krisda Chaemsaithong
2021. Functions of the discourse markerSoin the LINDSEI-AR corpus. Cogent Arts & Humanities 8:1 DOI logo
Collet, Caroline, Stefan Diemer & Marie‐Louise Brunner
2021. Soin video‐mediated communication in the Expanding Circle. World Englishes 40:4 ► pp. 594 ff. DOI logo
Sato, Shie
2019. A corpus-based analysis of so in written discourse: A comparison between L1 English speakers and Japanese EFL learners. Applied Pragmatics 1:1 ► pp. 26 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue