Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 27:1 (2017) ► pp.33–56

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

The role of ideology in evaluations of (in)appropriate behaviour in student-teacher relationships in China

 | University of Huddersfield
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 17 February 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.1.02kad
In this paper I examine Chinese perceptions of (in)appropriateness and offence from a cross-cultural pragmatic point of view, by exploring (in)appropriate evaluations in the context of a major social offence, and the influence of Confucian ideology on people’s evaluative tendencies. By doing so, I aim to contribute to pragmatic understandings of Confucianism as an ideology that underpins evaluative attitudes in Chinese culture. On the theoretical level, I argue that one needs to carefully examine dimensions of ideologies that underlie evaluative tendencies, and also the ways in which ideologies are invoked, rather than making sweeping claims. I believe that is possible to adopt ‘ideology’ as an analytic notion in interpersonal pragmatics and (im)politeness research, but only if the influence of ideology on interpersonal interaction and evaluative tendencies is captured with the aid of qualitative and quantitative evidence, that is, only as far as one avoids using a certain ideology as an umbrella term to analyse culturally-situated data.
References (48)
Bell, Daniel A. 2010. China’s New Confucianism: Politics and Everyday Life in a Changing Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian, and George Yule. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C.Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bucknall, Kevin. 2002. Chinese Business Etiquette and Culture. Retrieved from: [URL]
Cameron, Deborah. 2004. “Out of the Bottle: The Social Life of Metalanguage.” In Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives, ed. By Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland, and Daríusz Glasínsky, 311–322. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chan, Wang-Tsit. 1963. A Sourcebook of Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Xinyin, Qi Dong, and Hong Zhou. 1997. “Authoritative and Authoritarian Parenting Practices and Social and School Performance in Chinese Children.” International Journal of Behavioral Development 21 (4): 855–873. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai (ed.). 1969. The Semi-Professions and Their Organization. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fang, Tony. 1999. Chinese Business Negotiating Style. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. “Confucianism and Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 6 (2): 20–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gu, Yueguo. 1990. “Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics 141: 237–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Sandra, Karen Grainger, and Louise Mullany. 2006. “The Pragmatics of Political Apologies.” Discourse & Society 17 (6): 715–737. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2016 forthcoming. The Metapragmatics of (Im)Politeness. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
He, Amy Yun. 2012. “Different Generations, Different Face? A Discursive Approach to Naturally Occurring Compliment Responses in Chinese.” Journal of Politeness Research 8 (1): 29–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henry, Stuart. 2000. “What is School Violence? An Integrated Definition.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 567 (1): 16–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hong, Beverly. 1985. “Politeness in Chinese: Interpersonal Pronouns and Personal Greetings.” Anthropological Linguistics 27 (2): 204–213.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Yongliang. 2008. “Politeness Principle in Cross-culture Communication.” Retrieved from: [URL].
Hunston, Susan, and Geoff Thompson (eds.). 1999. Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and The Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hui, Leng. 2005. “Chinese Cultural Schema of Education: Implications for Communication between Chinese Students and Australian Educators.” Issues in Educational Research 15 (1): 17–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jin, Lixian, and Martin Cortazzi. 2006. “Changing Practices in Chinese Cultures of Learning.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 19 (1): 5–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, John W. 1997. The Struggle for Student Rights: Tinker v. Des Moines and the 1960s. Lawrence: University of Kansas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. 2007. Terms of (Im)Politeness. Budapest: Eötvös Lorand University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Rosina Márquez Reiter. 2015. “(Im)politeness and (Im)morality: Insights from Intervention.” Journal of Politeness Research 11 (2): 239–260.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. forthcoming. Leveraging Relational Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kass, Leon R. 1990. “Practicing Ethics: Where is the Action?” Hastings Center Report 20 (1): 5–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan. 2013. Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelley, Michelle L., and Hui-Mei Tseng. 1992. “Cultural Differences in Child Rearing: A Comparison of Immigrant Chinese and Caucasian American Mothers.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 23 (4): 444–445. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Tianbo, and Gillian Owen Moreira. 2009. The Influence of Confucianism and Buddhism on Chinese Business: A Case of Aveiro, Portugal. Retrieved from: [URL]
Linguistic Politeness Research Group (ed.). 2011. Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Low, K.C. Patrick. 2010. “Confucius, Customer Service, and Service Excellence.” Conflict Resolution & Negotiation 41: 53–61.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
呂叔湘 Lü, Shuxiang 1985. 近代漢語指代詞 Jindai hanyu zhidaici [The pronouns of vernacular Chinese]. Shanghai: Xuelin chubanshe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pan, Yuling. 2000. Politeness in Chinese Face-to-Face Interaction. London: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pan, Yuling, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2012. Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sargent, Tanja Carmel. 2009. “Revolutionizing Ritual Interaction in the Classroom: Constructing the Chinese Renaissance of the Twenty-first Century.” Modern China 35 (6): 632–661. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schoenhals, Martin. 1993. The Paradox of Power in a People’s Republic of China Middle School. New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2011. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Fengyan. 2004. “Confucian Thinking in Traditional Moral Education: Key Ideas and Fundamental Features.” Journal of Moral Education 33 (4): 429–447. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang Xuan, Kasper Juffermans, and Caixia Du. 2015. “Harmony as Language Policy in China: An Internet Perspective.” Language Policy. Retrieved from: [URL]
Watson, Burton (trans.) 1999. The Zen Teachings of Master Lin-Chi: A Translation of the Lin-chi Lu. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yum, June Ock. 1988. “The Impact of Confucianism on Interpersonal Relationships and Communication Patterns in East Asia.” Communication Monographs 55 (4). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Guogang. 2007. “Relationship between Parents and Children in the Tang Dynasty.” Journal of Chinese Literature and History 31: 207–249.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Tong, and Barry Schwartz. 1997. “Confucius and the Cultural Revolution: A Study in Collective Memory.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 11 (2): 189–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhu, Yunxia. 2009. “Confucian Ethics Exhibited in the Discourse of Chinese Business and Marketing Communication.” Journal of Business Ethics 881: 517–528. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Chen, Qiuxu, Yidan Gao, Yuchi Zhang & Juan Wang
2025. The mediating effects of basic psychological needs on the associations between teacher support and Chinese adolescents’ science and math self-efficacy. Research in Science & Technological Education 43:4 ► pp. 1126 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Huashan
2025. Foreign language enjoyment, anxiety, and boredom among Chinese L3 learners: the predictive effects of learner and teacher variables. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Le, Thanh Thao, Hoang Yen Phuong, Trut Thuy Pham, Ngoc Bao-Chau Tran & Thi Thuy-Linh Nguyen
2024. Exploring the cultural portrayal of Vietnamese teachers: an analytical study of professional identity in Vietnamese teaching-themed songs. F1000Research 13 ► pp. 631 ff. DOI logo
Muyunda, Gift & Lei Yue
2022. Confucius’ Education Thoughts and Its Influence on Moral Education in China. International Journal of Social Learning (IJSL) 2:2 ► pp. 250 ff. DOI logo
McConachy, Troy & Helen Spencer-Oatey
2021. Cross-Cultural and Intercultural Pragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 733 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. Evaluating the appropriacy of Ritual Frame Indicating Expressions (RFIEs): A case study of learners of Chinese and English. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 16:1 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Xinren
2019. ‘Family-culture’ and Chinese politeness. Acta Linguistica Academica 66:2 ► pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 567 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue