Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 27:1 (2017) ► pp.1–32
“Communication is a two-way street”
Instructors’ perceptions of student apologies
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 17 February 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.1.01che
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.1.01che
Speech act studies are increasingly likely to use retrospective verbal protocols to record the thoughts of participants who produced targeted speech acts (e.g., Cohen & Olshtain, 1993). However, although communication is always a two-way street, little is known about the recipients’ perceptions of speech acts. In academic communication at universities, it is critical for students to gain awareness of the socio-cultural norms as well as knowledge of appropriate linguistic forms in interacting with instructors. Therefore, gathering perceptual information from instructors, the recipients of many speech acts such as apologies, serves an important role in realizing successful student-instructor communication. Targeting instructors’ perceptions, two forms of an online survey were created via surveygizmo.com, with one including 12 spoken apologies and the other including 12 emailed apologies. An equal number of native (NS) and nonnative English speaking (NNS) students produced these apologies. The 150 instructors who responded to the survey gave significantly higher ratings to apologies made by NS students than to those made by NNS students. An analysis of instructors’ explanations after the ratings showed that both sociopragmatic and pragmalinguistic knowledge (Thomas, 1983) were valued in the successful realization of apologies, with the majority of instructor explanations addressing the sociopragmatic aspects of apology productions. In their comments on highly-rated student apologies, instructors appreciated the fact that students took responsibility in apologizing, offered worthy explanations, and delivered the messages with minimum grammatical mistakes. Poorly rated apology messages did not contain sufficient or valid evidence, inconvenienced the instructors through inappropriate requests, and usually had multiple grammatical mistakes. This study provides useful source of information to be used in university classrooms that can orientate novice learners towards socio-cultural expectations and appropriate lexical markers to be employed in making successful apologies in academic settings.
Keywords: online survey, perceptions, instructors' ratings, apologies
References (17)
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1978. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cheng, Dongmei. 2013. “Student-instructor Apologies: How are they Produced and Perceived?” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
Cohen, Andrew D., and Elite Olshtain. 1993. “The Production of Speech Acts by EFL Learners.” TESOL Quarterly 271: 33–56.
Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria. 2011. “‘Please answer me as soon as possible’: Pragmatic Failure in Non-Native Speakers’ E-email Requests to Faculty.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 3193–3215.
Eslami, Zohreh R., and Abbass Eslami-Rasekh. 2008. “Enhancing the Pragmatic Competence of Non-Native English-Speaking Teacher Candidates (NNSTCs) in an EFL Context.” In Investigating Pragmatics in Foreign Language Learning, Teaching and Testing., ed. by E.A. Soler, and A. Martínez-Flor, 178–197. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Evetts, Julia. 2003. “The Sociological Analysis of Professionalism: Occupational Change in the Modern World.” International Sociology 181: 395–415.
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César. 2008. “Perceptions of Refusals to Invitations: Exploring the Minds of Foreign Language Learners.” Language Awareness 171: 195–211.
Ishihara, Noriko. 2009. “Teacher-based Assessment for Foreign Language Learners.” TESOL Quarterly 431: 445–470.
. 2010. “Assessing Learners’ Pragmatic Ability in the Classroom.” In Pragmatics: Teaching Speech Acts, ed. by D.H. Tatsuki, and N.R. Houck, 209–227. Alexandria, Virginia: TESOL.
Littlemore, Jeannette. 2003. “The Communicative Effectiveness of Different Types of Communication Strategy.” System 311: 331–347.
Swart, William, Steve Duncan, and Rosina Chia. 2009. Professionalism and Work Ethic among U.S. and Asian University Students in a Global Classroom: A Multi-cultural Comparison. International Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics 71: 36–40.
Taguchi, Naoko. 2003. Pragmatic Performance in Comprehension and Production of English as a Second Language. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ.
. 2011. “Rater Variation in the Assessment of Speech Acts.” Pragmatics 21 (3): 453–471.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Walker, Tania
An, Yi, Hang Su & Mingyou Xiang
2022. Apology responses and gender differences in spoken British English. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:1 ► pp. 28 ff.
Halenko, Nicola & Lisa Winder
2022. Openings and closings in institutionally-situated email requests. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 7:1 ► pp. 54 ff.
Walker, Talia
Su, Hang
2021. Changing patterns of apology in spoken British English. Pragmatics and Society 12:3 ► pp. 410 ff.
Su, Hang & Naixing Wei
2018. “I’m really sorry about what I said”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 28:3 ► pp. 439 ff.
Cheng, Dongmei
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
