Article published In: The referential ambiguity of personal pronouns and its pragmatic consequences
Edited by Barbara De Cock and Bettina Kluge
[Pragmatics 26:3] 2016
► pp. 447–471
Pragmatic use of ancient greek pronouns in two communicative frameworks
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 September 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.26.3.05meh
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.26.3.05meh
This paper deals with the use of personal pronouns (PPs) in Ancient Greek in two Aristophanes’ comedies (i.e. Lysistrata and Ecclesiazusae). The main purpose of this study is to show that Ancient Greek PPs often have a pragmatic function, in particular linked to the speaker’s communicative goals. The analysis highlights the presence of a gender-related distribution and a context-dependent use of personal pronouns. In particular, male characters prefer 1st person singular pronouns, whereas female characters use more 1st person plural pronouns with an inclusive value. Moreover, in two communicative frameworks it is possible to notice how PPs are used for their value of membership categorization. In this respect PPs can be considered possible markers of autonomía or afiliación (see Bravo 1999). Some peculiar instances of referential ambiguities concern in particular the use of 1st and 2nd person plural pronouns in both comedies.The analysis shows that use of Ancient Greek PPs varies according to gender and context. Moreover, it is clear that in both comedies this variation should be explained mainly as a pragmatic strategy of membership categorization, thus showing instances of non-prototypical uses of PPs similar to other languages (e.g. Spanish, English, Modern Greek).
References (42)
Bazzanella, Carla (2009) Noi come meccanismo di intensità. In Barbara Gili-Fivela, andCarla Bazzanella (eds.), Fenomeni di intensità nell’italiano parlato. Florence: Cesati, pp. 101-114.
Bonifazi, Anna (2004) κεῖνοςin Pindar: Between grammar and poetic intention. Classical Philology 991: 283-299.
Bravo, Diana (1999) ¿Imagen positiva vs. imagen negativa? Pragmática socio-cultural y componentes de face. Oralia 21: 22-45.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson (1987) Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bruno, Carla (forthcoming) Dietro la maschera. Funzioni della prima persona nella lingua della tragedia.
Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Ancient GreekLinguistics (N.S.), Rome 2015
, March 23rd-27th.
Davidson, Brad (1996) ‘Pragmatic weight’ and Spanish subject pronouns. The pragmatic and discourse uses of ‘tú’ and ‘yo’ in spoken Madrid Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 161: 543-565.
Dickey, Eleanor (1996) Greek forms of address. From Herodotus to Lucian. Oxford: Clarendon Press. BoP
De Cock, Barbara (2011) Why wecan be you: The use of 1st person plural forms with hearer reference in English and Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 431: 2762-2775.
Hacohen, Gonen-Dori, and Emanuel A. Schegloff (2006) On the preference for minimization in referring to persons: Evidence from Hebrew conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 381: 1305–1312. BoP
Helmbrecht, Johannes (2003) Politeness distinctions in second person pronouns. In Friedrich Lenz (ed.), Deictic conceptualization of space, time and person. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 185-203.
(2015) A typology of non-prototypical uses of personal pronouns: Synchrony and diachrony. Journal of Pragmatics 881: 176-189.
Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel, and Juan Camilo Conde Silvestre (2012) The handbook of historical sociolinguistics. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
Henderson, Jeffrey (1987) Aristophanes. Lysistrata, edited with introduction and commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Paperbacks.
Hirschman, Lynette (1994) Female-maledifferences in conversational interaction. Language in Society 23.3: 427-442.
Holmes, Janet (1997) Women, language and identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1.2: 195-223. BoP
Hymes, Dell (1974) Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. London: Tavistock. BoP
MacDowell, Douglas M. (1995) Aristophanes and Athens. An introduction to the plays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McClure, Laura K. (1999) Spoken like a woman: Speech and gender in Athenian drama. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Meluzzi, Chiara (2010) Lisistrata, Prassagora e le altre: Un’analisi sociolinguistica e pragmatica della lingua delle donne in Aristofane. MA, Vercelli: University of Eastern Piedmont, unpublished.
(2012) “You” and “me” in Ancient Greek: The case of three “female” comedies. In Wojciech Sowa, and Stefan Schaffner (eds.),
Greek and Latin from an Indo-European perspective 3 (GLIEP3). Proceedings of the conference held at the Comenius University Bratislava
, July 8th-10th 2010, Supplement of IJDL, pp. 81-100.
(2014) Gli allocutivi nella “Lisistrata”: Proposta di analisi pragmatica. In Maria PiaMarchese, and Alberto Nocentini (a cura di). Il lessico nella teoria e nella storia linguistica. Roma: Il Calamo, pp. 235-240.
Mühlhäusler, Peter, and Rom Harré (1990) Pronouns and people: The linguistic construction of social and personal identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Olson, Douglas (1992) Names and naming in Aristophanic comedy. The Classical Quarterly 42.2: 304-319.
Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula (2012) Collective aspects of subjectivity: The subject pronoun εμείς (“we”) in Modern Greek. In Nicole Baumgarten, InkeDu Bois, and JulianeHouse (eds.), Subjectivity in language andin discourse. Studies in PragmaticSciences 101. London: Brill Academic Pub., pp. 33-65.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff,Gail Jefferson and (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50.4: 696-735. BoP
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2007) A tutorial on membership categorization, Journal of Pragmatics 391: 462-482. BoP
Sommerstein, Alan H. (1977) Aristophanes and the events of 411. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 971: 112-126.
. (1995) The language of Athenian women. In Francesco DiMartino, and Alan H. Sommerstein (eds.), Lo spettacolo delle voci. Bari: Levante, pp. 61-85.
Stewart, Miranda (2001) Pronouns of power and solidarity: The case of Spanish first person plural nosotros
. Multilingua 201: 155-169. BoP
(2003) ‘Pragmatic weight’ and face: Pronominal presence and the case of the Spanish second person singular subject pronoun tú. Journal of Pragmatics 351: 191-206.
Tannen, Deborah (1990) You just don’t understand. Women and men in conversation. London: Virago Press. BoP
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Meluzzi, Chiara
2017. Diminutives in Ancient Greek. In Exploring Intensification [Studies in Language Companion Series, 189], ► pp. 127 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
