Article published In: The referential ambiguity of personal pronouns and its pragmatic consequences
Edited by Barbara De Cock and Bettina Kluge
[Pragmatics 26:3] 2016
► pp. 379–416
A pragmatic analysis of german impersonally used first person singular ‘ICH’
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 September 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.26.3.03zob
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.26.3.03zob
The German first and second person singular pronouns ich and du allow for a referential use and an impersonal use. In their impersonal use, both pronouns behave like the impersonal pronoun man (Engl. one) in generic sentences. I argue that the aspect of impersonally used singular personal pronouns that distinguishes them (i) from each other, (ii) from impersonal pronouns, and (iii) from “ordinary” generic sentences is their pragmatic effects. The semantic contribution of the three pronouns and their containing utterances is discussed before a comparative analysis of the pragmatic effects of impersonally used ich and du and impersonal man is given. The analyses are illustrated with naturally occurring data from a self-compiled data collection. Turning to a more practical topic in the second part of the paper, I discuss a methodological issue regarding corpus-based analyses of low-frequency phenomena, such as impersonally used ich in the second part of this paper by reporting a small-scale corpus study.
References (36)
Alonso-Ovalle, Luis (2002) Arbitrary pronouns are not that indefinite. In C. Beyssade, R. Bok-Bennema, F. Drijkoningen, and P.Monachesi (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2000. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsPublishing Company, pp. 1-15.
Amaral, Patricia Matos, Craige Roberts, and E. Allyn Smith (2007) Review of ‘The Logic of Conventional Implicature’ by Chris Potts. Linguistics and Philosophy 301: 707-749.
Chierchia, Gennaro (1995) The variability of impersonal subjects. In E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer, and B.H. Partee (eds.), Quantification inNatural Languages. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing, pp. 107-143.
Cinque, Guglielmo (1988) On “si”constructions and the theory of arb. Linguistic Inquiry 191: 521-581.
Condoravdi, Cleo (1989) Indefinite and generic pronouns. In E. Jane Fee, and K. Hunt (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth WestCoast Conference on FormalLinguistics, pp.71-84.
De Cock, Barbara (this volume) Non-prototypicality of personal pronouns in typical registers? A cross-linguistic analysis. Pragmatics 26.3: 361-378.
Gregersen, Frans, and Torben Juel Jensen (this volume) How did ‘man’ become ‘du’, or did it? The pragmatics of generic second person pronouns in modern Danish spoken language. Pragmatics 26.3: 417-446.
Grice, Paul (1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58. BoP
Grimberg, Mary Lou (1994) On Nunberg on indexicality and deixis. UCL Working Papersin Linguistics 61:1-38.
Gregersen, Frans, and Torben Juel Jensen (this volume) How did ‘man’ become ‘du’, or did it? The pragmatics of generic second person pronouns in modern Danish spoken language. Pragmatics 26.3: 417-446.
Grice, Paul (1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58. BoP
Grimberg, Mary Lou (1994) On Nunberg on indexicality and deixis. UCL Working Papersin Linguistics 61:1-38.
Gruber, Bettina (2011) Indexical pronouns: Generic uses as clues to their structure. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 471: 331-360.
Helmbrecht, Johannes (2015) A typology of non-prototypical uses of personal pronouns: Synchrony and diachrony. Journal of Pragmatics 881: 176-189.
Hugo Rojas, Evelyn (2011) Las formas de segunda persona singularcomo estrategias evidenciales [The forms of second singular person as evidential strategies]. Revista de Linguistica Teorica y Aplicada Concepcion (Chile) 491: 143-167.
Kaplan, David (1989) Demonstratives. In J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 481-563.
Kitagawa, Chisato, and Adrienne Lehrer (1990) Impersonal uses of personal pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics 141: 739-759. BoP
Kluge, Bettina (this volume) Misunderstanding or (deliberately) misinterpreting the second singular –how speakers politely deal with referential ambiguity. Pragmatics 26.3: 501-522.
Krifka, Manfred, Francis Jeffry Pelletier, Gregory N. Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Gennaro Chierchia, and Godehard Link (1995) Genericity: An introduction. In G. Carlson, and J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1-124.
Laberge, Suzanne, and Gillian Sankoff (1979) Anything youcan do. In T. Givón, (ed.), Discourse and syntax. New York: Academic Press, pp. 419-40.
Malamud, Sophia A. (2006) Semantics and pragmatics of arbitrariness. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
. (2012) Impersonal indexicals: One, you, man, and du
. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 151:1-48.
Moltmann, Friederike (2006) Generic one, arbitrary PRO, and the first person. Natural Language Semantics 141: 257-281.
Nogué, Neus, and Òscar Bladas (this volume) “Que bé, tu!” (“That’s great, you!”): Non-prototypical uses of the second person singular pronoun tu(you) in spoken Catalan. Pragmatics 26.3: 473-500.
Nunberg, Geoffrey (1993) Indexicality and deixis. Linguistics and Philosophy 161: 1-43. BoP
Potts, Chris (2005) The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. BoP
Tarenskeen, Sammie (2010) From you to me (and back):The flexible meaning of the secondperson pronoun in Dutch. Master’s thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Thurmair, Maria (1989) Modalpartikeln und ihreKombinationen. Linguistische Arbeiten 223. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Zifonun, Gisela (2000) Man lebt nur einmal. Morphosyntax und Semantik des Pronomens “man”. Deutsche Sprache 281: 232-253.
Zimmermann, Malte (2011) Discourse particles. In C. Maienborn, K. vonHeusinger, and P. Portner (eds.), Handbook Semantics (HandbücherzurSprach-und Kommunikationswissenschaft HSK 33.2). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 2011-2038.
Zobel, Sarah (2010) Non-standard uses of German 1st person singular pronouns. In K. Nakakoji, Y. Murakami, and E. McCready (eds.), JSAI-isAI, LNAI 62841, pp. 292-311.
(2014) Impersonally Interpreted Personal Pronouns. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Göttingen. Available at [URL]
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Kluge, Bettina
2019. Laure Gardelle and Sandrine Sorlin (eds), The Pragmatics of Personal Pronouns
. English Text Construction 12:1 ► pp. 154 ff.
Kluge, Bettina
2022. Generic uses of the second person singular – how speakers deal with referential ambiguity and misunderstandings. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 501 ff.
Auer, Peter & Anja Stukenbrock
Van Olmen, Daniël & Adri Breed
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.