Article published In: Pragmatics: Online-First Articles
When personal names are mentioned in conversations
Presumed known, perhaps known and presumed unknown
Published online: 27 January 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.25001.whi
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.25001.whi
Abstract
Sacks and Schegloff (Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel A. Schegloff. 1979. “Two
Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation and their
Interaction.” In Everyday Language: Studies in
Ethnomethodology, edited by George Psathas, 15–21. New York: Irvington.; 1996. “Some Practices for Referring to
Persons in Talk-in-Interaction: A Partial Sketch of a
Systematics.” In Studies in Anaphora, edited
by Barbara Fox, 437–485. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ) identify a preference for recognitional references to persons over non-recognitional forms of
references. Furthermore, they identify as a subsidiary preference that, among recognitional forms, personal names are preferred
over recognitional descriptors. However, as Sacks and Schegloff indicate, these preferences in no way limit the use of names to
conclusively recognizable persons, nor do they even inhibit references to persons by name when recognition is not at all
practicable. In this report, we first describe those practices that manage (and thereby exhibit) levels of confidence regarding
the recognizability of personal names. We then examine several environments in which personal names are employed in introducing
persons as previously unknown to recipients, and we describe one family of practices for doing so. Finally, we identify
storytelling as a principal environment in which personal names are used, and we describe where unknown persons are introduced by
storytellers.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Names as recognitional references to persons
- 3.“If recognition is possible, try to achieve it”
- 4.Introducing persons
- 5.Introducing persons in stories told in conversations
- 5.1Introducing persons by name: As a story begins
- 5.2Introducing persons by name: When they appear in the story
- 6.Concluding remarks
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (39)
Clayman, Steven E. 2013. “Agency in Response: The Role of
Prefatory Address Terms.” Journal of
Pragmatics 571: 290–302.
Dingemanse, Mark, Giovanni Rossi, and Simeon Floyd. 2017. “Place
Reference in Story Beginnings: A Cross-linguistic Study of Narrative and Interactional
Affordances.” Language in
Society 46 (2): 129–158.
Downing, Pamela A. 1996. “Proper Names as a Referential
Option in English Conversation.” In Studies in
Anaphora, edited by Barbara Fox, 95–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ekberg, Stuart. 2014. “Maintaining
Shared Knowledge of Acquaintance: Methods People Use to Establish Who Knows Whom.” British
Journal of Social
Psychology 53 (4): 605–621.
Goodwin, Charles. 1984. “Notes
on Story Structure and the Organization of
Participation.” In Structures of Social
Action, edited by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 225–246. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, John. 2007. “Intersubjectivity
and Progressivity in Person (and Place) Reference.” In Person
Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, edited
by N. J. Enfield, and Tanya Stivers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holt, Elizabeth. 1996. “Reporting
on Talk: The Use of Direct Reported Speech in Conversation.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 29 (3): 219–245.
Jackson, Clare. 2013. “‘Why
Do These People’s Opinions Matter?’ Positioning Known Referents as Unnameable
Others.” Discourse
Studies 15 (3): 299–317.
Jefferson, Gail. 1974. “Error
Correction as an Interactional Resource.” Language in
Society 21: 181–199.
. 1978. “Sequential
Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation.” In Studies in the
Organization of Coversational Interaction, edited by Jim Schenkein, 219–248. New York: Academic Press.
. 2004. “Glossary
of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation
Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, edited by Gene H. Lerner, 13–23. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kitzinger, Celia. 2005. ““Speaking
as a Heterosexual”: (How) Does Sexuality Matter for Talk-in-Interaction?” Research on Language
and Social
Interaction 38 (3): 221–265.
Kushida, Shuya. 2015. “Using
Names for referring Without Claiming Shared Knowledge: Name-Quoting Descriptors in
Japanese.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 48 (2): 230–251.
Lerner, Gene H. 1992. “Assisted Storytelling:
Deploying Shared Knowledge as a Practical Matter.” Qualitative
Sociology 15 (3): 247–271.
1996. “On the Place of Linguistic
Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: ‘Second Person’ Reference in Multi-Party
Conversation.” Pragmatics 6 (3): 281–294.
2003. “Selecting Next Speaker: The
Context-Sensitive Operation of a Context-Free Organization.” Language in
Society 321: 177–201.
2019. “When Someone Other Than the
Addressed Recipient Speaks Next: Three Kinds of Intervening Action After the Selection of Next
Speaker.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 52 (4): 388–405.
Lerner, Gene H., Galina B. Bolden, Alexa Hepburn, and Jenny Mandelbaum. 2012. “Reference
Recalibration Repairs: Adjusting the Precision of Formulations for the Task at Hand.” Research
on Language & Social
Interaction 45 (2): 191–212.
Lerner, Gene H., and Celia Kitzinger. 2007. “Extraction
and Aggregation in the Repair of Individual and Collective Self-Reference.” Discourse
Studies 9 (4): 526–557.
Mandelbaum, Jenny. 1989. “Interpersonal
Activities in Conversational Storytelling.” Western Journal of
Speech 53 (2): 114–126.
Oh, Sun-Young. 2007. “Interactional
Functions of English Demonstratives in Personal Reference.” English Language and
Linguistics 231: 225–255.
Pillet-Shore, Danielle. 2011. “Doing
Introductions: The Work Involved in Meeting Someone New.” Communication
Monographs 78 (1): 73–95.
Raymond, Chase Wesley, and Virginia Teas Gill. 2025. “Pre-emptive
Repair of Potential Misunderstandings: Prospective Procedures for Managing Intersubjectivity and Steering Social
Action.” American Sociological
Review 90 (4): 690–725.
Raymond, Geoffrey, and John Heritage. 2006. “The
Epistemics of Social Relations: Owning Grandchildren.” Language in
Society 35 (5): 677–705.
Sacks, Harvey. 1974. “An
Analysis of the Course of a Joke’s Telling in
Conversation.” In Explorations in the Ethnography of
Speaking, edited by Richard Bauman, and Joel Sherzer, 337–353. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 1979. “Hotrodder:
A Revolutionary Category.” In Everyday Language: Studies in
Ethnomethodology, edited by George Psathas, 7–14. New York: Irvington.
Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel A. Schegloff. 1979. “Two
Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation and their
Interaction.” In Everyday Language: Studies in
Ethnomethodology, edited by George Psathas, 15–21. New York: Irvington.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1972. “Notes on a Conversational
Practice: Formulating Place.” In Studies in Social
Interaction, edited by David N. Sudnow, 75–119. New York: Free Press.
1992. “Introduction.” In Lectures
on Conversation, edited by Gail Jefferson, ix–lxii. Oxford: Blackwell.
1996. “Some Practices for Referring to
Persons in Talk-in-Interaction: A Partial Sketch of a
Systematics.” In Studies in Anaphora, edited
by Barbara Fox, 437–485. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2009. “One Perspective on Conversation
Analysis: Comparative Perspectives.” In Conversation Analysis:
Comparative Perspectives, edited by Jack Sidnell, 357–406. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stivers, Tanya. 2007. “Alternative
Recognitionals in Person Reference.” In Person Reference in
Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives, edited by N. J. Enfield, and Tanya Stivers, 73–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Svennevig, Jan. 2010. “Pre-empting
Reference Problems in Conversation.” Language in
Society 39 (2): 173–202.
Tennent, Emma, and Ann Weatherall. 2024. “Person
Reference and a Preference for Association in Emergency Calls.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 57 (2): 235–252.
Whitehead, Kevin A., and Gene H. Lerner. 2009. “When
Are Persons ‘White’? On Some Practical Asymmetries of Racial Reference in
Talk-in-Interaction.” Discourse and
Society 20 (5): 613–641.