Article published In: Relational work in Facebook and discussion boards/fora
Edited by Miriam A. Locher, Brook Bolander and Nicole Höhn
[Pragmatics 25:1] 2015
► pp. 23–45
Politeness on Facebook
The case of Greek birthday wishes
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 March 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.25.1.02the
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.25.1.02the
Facebook forms one of the most widely used online social networks, through which people manage their communication with diverse
contacts or ‘friends’, ranging from members of the family and schoolmates to work colleagues and popular cultural idols or other
people, whom they admire. Hence, it can be seen as an integral part of people’s digital presence. Against this backdrop, the aim
of this paper is to investigate the ways politeness is constructed in a context, in which it is not very typical to find
politeness in the Western world: The reception of birthday wishes. The focus is on the (para)linguistic reception of birthday
wishes on behalf of 400 native Greek users of Facebook, aged between 25–35 years old, as evidenced in the ways they respond to
birthday wishes posted on their walls. By using a combination of interactional sociolinguistics, discourse-centered online
ethnography and offline ethnographic interviews, I argue that native speakers of Greek do not just stick to the politic behavior
found in other languages, like English, of personally thanking their friends for their birthday wishes; rather, they employ
contextualization cues, such as shifts in spelling, emoticons and punctuation markers, in order to construct frames and footings
of politeness by actually reciprocating the wishes they received from their friends. The value of this study lies not only in
being, to my knowledge, the first description and interpretation of an important cultural phenomenon for Greeks, which is the
exchange of birthday wishes, but also it contributes towards understanding politeness in online environments, such as Facebook,
which in turn is used for establishment and maintenance of interpersonal relationships, hence it can lead to smooth
communication.
References (51)
Androutsopoulos, Jannis (2008) Potentials and limitations of discourse-centered online ethnography. Language@Internet 51: article 8. Retrieved January 10, 2011, from [URL]
(2009) ‘Greeklish’: Transliteration practice and discourse in the context of computer-mediated digraphia. In A. Georgakopoulou, and M. Silk (eds.), Standard Languages and Language Standards: Greek, Past and Present. Farnham, Surrey and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, pp. 221–249.
Arcimavičienė, Liudmila (2010) Cognitive approach to language teaching. Cultural reality through metaphor: A case study of birthday wishes. Respectus Philologicus 18.23: 170–178. Retrieved April 16, 2011, from [URL].
Barton, David, and Carmen Lee (2013) Language Online. Investigating Digital Texts and Practices. London: Routledge.
Bolander, Brook, and Miriam A. Locher (2010) Constructing identity on Facebook: Report on a pilot study. In D. Mailla, and K. Junod (eds.), Performing the Self. Tübingen: Narr, pp. 165–185.
(2014) Doing sociolinguistic research on computer-mediated data: A review of four methodological issues. Discourse, Context and Media 31: 14-26.
boyd, Danah M., and Nicole B. Ellison (2007) Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13.1: article 11. Retrieved June 23, 2013, from [URL].
Brandtzæg, Petter B. (2012) Social networking sites: Their users and social implications – A longitudinal study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17.4: 467–488.
Bucholtz, Mary (2007) Interviews and interaction as sociolinguistic data. Presentation at the ‘Ethnographic Methods in Sociocultural Linguistics’ Workshop. Stanford University. Retrieved July 13, 2011, from [URL]
Chatfield, Tom (2013) Netymology. From Apps to Zombies: A Linguistic Celebration of the Digital World. London: Quercus.
Emerson, Robert M., Rachel I. Fretz, and Linda L. Shaw (2001) Participant observation and fieldnotes. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, and L. Lofland (eds.), Handbook of Ethnography. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage, pp. 352–368.
Ess, Charles, and the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (2001) Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research. Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee. Retrieved June 23, 2013, from, [URL].
Eysenbach, Gunther, and James E. Till (2001) Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. BMJ 3231: 1103–1105.
Goffman, Erving (1967) On face work. Interactional Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, pp. 5–45.
(1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York.: Harper & Row. BoP
(1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. BoP
Goodwin, Charles, and Alessandro Duranti (1992) Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti, and C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context. Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–43. BoP
Goodwin, Charles, and John Heritage (1990) Conversation Analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 191: 283–307. Retrieved June 23, 2013, from [URL].
Gumperz, John J. (ed.) (1982) Language and Social Identity. New York/Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
. (1999) On interactional sociolinguistic method. In S. Sarangi, and C. Roberts (eds.), Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 453–472.
Gumperz, John J., and Dell Hymes (1972) Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt Rinehard and Winston. BoP
Herring, Susan C. (2007) A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@Internet 41: Retrieved June 23, 2013, from [URL].
Herring, Susan C., Lois A. Scheidt, Sabrina Bonus, and Elija Wright (2004) Bridging the gap: A genre analysis of weblogs. Proceedings of the 37th Hawai'i International Conference on System Sciences
. Los Alamitos: IEEE Press. Retrieved June 23, 2013, from [URL].
Kahn, Seth (2011) Putting ethnographic writing in context. In C. Lowe, and P. Zemliansky (eds.), Writing Spaces: Readings on Writing. Retrieved June 23, 2013, from [URL]
Kalman, Yoram M., and Darren Gergle (2010) CMC cues enrich lean online communication: The case of letter and punctuation mark repetitions. Proceedings of the AIS 5th Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MCIS 2010)
. Retrieved 23 June, 2013, from [URL].
Karakayali, Nedim, and Aysenur Kilic (2013) More network conscious than ever? Challenges, strategies, and analytic labor of users in the Facebook environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18.2: 61–79.
Koutsogiannis, Dimitris, and Bessie Mitsikopoulou (2003) Greeklish and Greekness: Trends and discourses of "glocalness". Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 9.1: Retrieved June 23, 2013, from [URL].
Locher, Miriam A. (2010) Introduction: Politeness and impoliteness in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 6.1: 1–5.
Lucy, John A. (1992) Language Diversity and Thought. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. BoP
Manovich, Lea (2001) The Language of New Media. Boston, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved June 23, 2013, from [URL].
Miller, Carolyn. R., and Dawn Shepherd (2004) Blogging as social action: A genre analysis of the weblog. In L.J. Gurak, S. Antonijevic, L. Johnson, N. Ratliff, and J. Reyman (eds.), Into the Blogosphere: Rhetoric, Community, and Culture of Weblogs. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. Retrieved June 23, 2013, from [URL]
Pauwels, Luc (2012) A multimodal framework for analyzing websites as cultural expressions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17.3: 247–265.
Rampton, Ben, Karen Tusting, Janet Maybin, Richard Barwell, Angela Creese, and Vally Lytra (2004) UK Linguistic ethnography: A discussion paper. Retrieved January 3, 2011, from [URL].
Sandler, Randall (2013) Vignette 3d. Real ethical issues in virtual world research. In C. Mallinson, Becky Childs, and Gerard Van Herk (eds.), Data Collection in Sociolinguistics. London: Routledge, pp. 48-52.
Schiffrin, Deborah (1994) Approaches to Discourse. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell. BoP
Sifianou, Maria (1992) Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press. BoP
Spilioti, Tereza (2009) Graphemic representation of text-messaging: Alphabet-choice and code-switches in Greek SMS. Pragmatics 19.3: 393–412. BoP
Walther, Joseph B., and Jeong-woo Jang (2012) Communication processes in participatory websites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18.1: 2–15.
Tannen, Deborah, and Cynthia Wallat (1999) Interactive frames and knowledge schemas. In A. Jaworski, and N. Coupland (eds.), The Discourse Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 346–366.
Theodoropoulou, Irene (2014a) Sociolinguistics of Style and Social Class in Contemporary Athens. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
(2014b) Facebook talk: An interactional analysis of Aganaktismenoi Wall discussions. In M. Christodoulidou (ed.), Greek Talk-in-Interaction. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 262-289.
(2014c) Intercultural communicative styles in Qatar: Greek and Qataris. In R. Raddawi (ed.), Intercultural Communication with Arabs: Studies in Education, Professional, and Societal Contexts. New York: Springer, pp. 11-26.
Tusting, Karin, and Janet Maybin (2007) Linguistic ethnography and interdisciplinarity: Opening the discussion. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11.5: 575–583.
Watts, Richard J. (2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Williams, Glyn (1992) Sociolinguistics: A Sociological Critique. London: Routledge. BoP
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Esteban Fernández, Nacho
Trillò, Tommaso
Tsoumou, Jean Mathieu
Kitade, Keiko
Konyaeva, Yulia
Serrano, María José
2019. Los objetos verbales de persona como variantes de tratamiento
interpersonal canario en la red social Facebook. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:1 ► pp. 329 ff.
Ton, Thoai N. L.
2019. A literature review of address studies from pragmatic and sociolinguistic perspectives. In It’s not all about you [Topics in Address Research, 1], ► pp. 23 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
