Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 24:4 (2014) ► pp.819–838
You didn’t build that. a relevance-theoretic approach to President Obama’s campaign flub
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 December 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.4.07zak
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.4.07zak
During the 2012 U.S. Presidential campaign, President Obama turned some heads by stating “If you’ve got a business – you didn’t build that”. His opponents argued that this was an attack on private enterprise (with “that” referring to business), while his supporters and fact-checking organizations maintained that “that” referred to what Obama was talking about previously (U.S. infrastructure) and represented his political-economic plan of an increased interlacing of private business with government investment. I argue, from a relevance-theoretic perspective, that both interpretations follow from differing contextual assumptions on the part of the audience. In this sense, the role of contextual assumptions in utterance interpretation is highlighted – different contextual assumptions lead to different cognitive effects if the utterance leaves room for more than one interpretation. Combined with a highly polarized U.S. political arena, where participants pounce on their opponent’s every possible miscue, all the ingredients for misunderstanding are present.
Keywords: Demonstratives, Obama, Relevance, Misunderstandings, Accessibility
References (33)
Ariel, Mira (1990) Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. Bristol: Routledge. BoP
(2001) Accessibility theory: An overview. In T. Sanders, J. Schliperoord, and W. Spooren (eds.), Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 29-87.
Bou-Franch, Patricia (2002) Misunderstandings and unofficial knowledge in institutional discourse. In D. Walton, and D. Scheu (eds.), Culture and Power: Ac(unofficially) knowledging Cultural Studies in Spain. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 323-341.
Carston, Robyn (2002) Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell. MetBib
(2007) How many pragmatic systems are there?. In M.-J. Frappoli (ed.), Saying, Meaning, Referring: Essays on the Philosophy of François Recanati. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 18-48.
(2009) The explicit/implicit distinction in pragmatics and the limits of explicit communication. International Review of Pragmatics 11: 35-62. BoP
Carston, R., and Alison Hall (2012) Implicature and explicature. In H.-J. Schmid (ed.), Cognitive Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 47-84.
Chafe, Wallace (1994) Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. BoP
(1996) Inferring identifiability and accessibility. In T. Fretheim, and J.K. Gundel (eds.), Reference and Referent Accessibility. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 37-46.
Furlong, Anne (1995) Relevance theory and Literary Interpretation. London: University College London [dissertation].
Goodman, Bradley A. (1986) Reference identification and reference identification failure. Computational Linguistics 12.4: 273-305.
Grice, Herbert Paul (1975) Logic and Conversation. In H.P. Cole, and J.L. Morgan (eds.), Speech Acts [= Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3]. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58. Reprinted in Paul H. Grice (1989) Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 22-40.
Gundel, Jeanette K. (2010) Reference and accessibility from a Givenness Hierarchy perspective. International Review of Pragmatics 21: 148-168.
Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg, and Ron Zacharski (1993) Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69.2: 274-307.
(2012) Underspecification of cognitive status in reference production: Some empirical predictions. Topics in Cognitive Science 41: 249-268.
Lamb, Clarice (2005) Misunderstandings – a sociolinguistic view on meaning. Letras de Hoje 40.1: 231-241.
Maes, Alfons, and Christ De Rooij (2007) (How) do demonstratives encode distance? In Proceedings of DAARC 2007, Lagos Portugal. Centro de Linguistica da Universidade de Porto, pp. 83-89.
Mirecki, Paweł (2008) Misunderstandings and communication failure in Relevance theory – a problem revisited. In E. Mioduszewska, and A. Piskorska (eds.), Relevance Round Table I, pp. 77-85.
Padilla Cruz, Manuel (2012) Epistemic vigilance, cautious optimism and sophisticated understanding. Research in Language 10.4: 365-386.
(1995²) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell. MetBib
(2004) Relevance theory. In L.R. Horn, and G. Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 607-632.
(2005) Pragmatics. In F. Jackson, and M. Smith (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 468-501. Reprinted in D. Sperber, and D. Wilson (2012), pp. 1-27.
Wilson, Deirdre, and Tomoko Matsui (1998) Recent approaches to bridging: Truth, coherence and relevance. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 101: 173-200. Reprinted in D. Sperber, and D. Wilson (2012), pp. 187-209.
Yus, Francisco (1999) Misunderstandings and explicit/implicit communication. Pragmatics 9.4: 487-517. BoP
