Article published In: Approaches to grammar for interactional linguistics
Edited by Ritva Laury, Marja Etelämäki and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
[Pragmatics 24:3] 2014
► pp. 507–532
On the place of turn and sequence in grammar
Verb-first clausal constructions in Swedish talk-in-interaction
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 September 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.3.04lin
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.3.04lin
This study elaborates the concept of a positionally sensitive grammar with respect to the sequentiality of turns and the turn constructional units in conversation. The linguistic object of the analysis is clausal constructions in Swedish that are initiated by the finite predicate verb: Polar questions, receipt questions (news receipts), conditional protases and pro-drop declaratives. These constructions share potentially the same syntactic surface pattern but are constrained by different sequential conditions of use. The study proposes an integrated interactional linguistic analysis which takes into account both syntactic and sequential aspects of turn construction. A grammatical attribute-value matrix, based on the framework of construction grammar (CxG), is introduced. The analysis shows that regularities of sequential organization may provide robust distinctive constructional features while a pure syntactic analysis remains less distinctive. The decisive constructional features are systematically captured by a notation designed for sequential and syntactic organization.
References (43)
Auer, Peter (1993) Zur Verbspitzenstellung im gesprochenen Deutsch. [On verb initial placement in spoken German]. Deutsche Sprache 21:3: 193-222.
(2005) Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text 25.1: 7-36. BoP
Auer, Peter, and Jan Lindström (2011) Verb-first conditionals in German and Swedish: Convergence in writing, divergence in speaking. In P. Auer, and S. Pfänder (eds.), Constructions: Emerging and emergent. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 218-262.
Auer, Peter, and Susanne Günthner (2003) Die Entstehung von Diskursmarkern im Deutschen – ein Fall von Grammatikalisierung? [The emergence of discourse markers in German – a case of grammaticalization?] InList – Interaction and Linguistic Structures, No. 38, December 2003. < [URL]>.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (this volume) What does grammar tell us about action? Pragmatics 24.3: 623-647.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Tsuyoshi Ono (2007) ‘Incrementing’ in conversation. A comparison of practices in English, German and Japanese. Pragmatics 171: 513-52.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting (2001) Introducing interactional linguistics. In M. Selting, and E. Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1-22. BoP
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Sandra A. Thompson (2012) Left-right asymmetries: The grammar of pro-repeat responses to informings in English conversation. Paper presented in a workshop on Left/Right Asymmetries in Talk. Freiburg: Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies, May 16, 2012.
Diderichsen, Paul (1946) Elementær dansk Grammatik. [Elementary Danish grammar]. København: Gyldendal.
Diessel, Holger (1997) Verb-first constructions in German. In M. Verspoor, K.D. Lee, and E. Sweetser (eds.), Lexical and syntactical constructions and the construction of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 51-68.
Ford, Cecilia E., and Sandra, A. Thompson (1996) Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff, and S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 134-184.
Fox, Barbara A., and Sandra A. Thompson (2010) Responses to wh-questions in English conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43.2: 133-156. BoP
Fried, Mirjam, and Jan-Ola Östman (2004) Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In M. Fried, and J-O. Östman (eds.), Construction grammar in a cross-language-perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 11-86.
(2005) Construction Grammar and spoken language: The case of pragmatic particles. Journal of Pragmatics 371: 1752-1778. BoP
Günthner, Susanne, and Wolfgang Imo (eds.) (2006) Konstruktionen in der Interaktion [Construction in interaction]. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. BoP
Hopper, Paul J. (2011) Emergent grammar and temporality in interactional linguistics. In P. Auer, and S. Pfänder (eds.), Constructions: Emerging and emergent. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 22-44.
Huhtamäki, Martina (2012) Prosodiska mönster hos frågor. En undersökning av Helsingforssvenska samtal. [Prosodic patterns in questions. A study of Helsinki Swedish conversations]. Språk och Stil 22.2: 153-184.
Karlsson, Susanna (2006) Positioneringsfraser i interaktion. [Positioning phrases in interaction]. Göteborg: Göteborgsstudier i nordisk språkvetenskap 5.
Laury, Ritva (ed.) (2008) Crosslinguistic studies of clause combining. The multifunctionality of conjunctions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. BoP
Lindström, Jan (2006) Grammar in the service of interaction: Exploring turn organization in Swedish. Research on Language and Social Interaction 39.1: 81-117.
(2008) Tur och ordning. Introduktion till svensk samtalsgrammatik. [Turn and order. An introduction into Swedish conversational grammar]. Stockholm: Norstedts Akademiska Förlag.
Lindström, Jan, & Susanna Karlsson (2005) Verb-first constructions as a syntactic and functional resource in (spoken) Swedish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 281: 97-131.
Lindström, Jan, and Anne-Marie Londen (2008) Constructing reasoning: The connectives för att (causal), så att (consecutive) and men att (adversative) in Swedish conversations. In J. Leino (ed.), Constructional reorganization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 105-152.
Linell, Per (2003) Responsiva konstruktioner i samtalsspråkets grammatik. [Responsive constructions in the grammar of conversational language]. Folkmålsstudier 421: 11-39.
(2005) The written language bias in linguistics. Its nature, origins and transformations. London & New York: Routledge.
Linell, Per, Johan Hofvendahl, and Camilla Lindholm (2003) Multi-unit question turns in institutional interactions: Sequential organizations and communicative functions. Text 23-4: 539-571.
Mörnsjö, Maria (2002) V1 declaratives in spoken Swedish. Syntax, information structure, and prosodic pattern. Lund: Lund University.
Norén, Niklas (2010) Pronominella returfrågor i tre vardagliga svenska samtal. [Pronominal return questions in three everyday conversations]. In C. Lindholm, and J. Lindström (eds.), Språk och interaktion 2. Helsinki: Department of Finnish, Finno-Ugrian and Scandinavian Studies, pp. 29-71.
Ono, Tsuyoshi, and Sandra A. Thompson (1995) What can conversation tell us about syntax? In P.W. Davis (ed.), Descriptive and theoretical modes in alternative linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 213-271.
Östman, Jan-Ola (2005) Construction discourse: A prolegomenon. In J-O. Östman, and M. Fried (eds.), Construction grammars. Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 121-144.
(2007) On formalizing ‘context’. Or, why complexity does not equal impossibility. In J. Härmä, E. Havu, M. Helkkula, M. Larjavaara, M. Lehtinen, and U. Tuomarla (eds.), SILF 2005. Actes du XXIXème Colloque International de Linguistique Fonctionnelle. Helsinki: Département des langues romanes de l’Université de Helsinki, pp. 205-212.
Platzack, Christer (1987) The case of narrative inversion in Swedish and Icelandic. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 311: 9-14.
Raymond, Geoffrey (2003) Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review 681: 939-967.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 501: 696-735. BoP
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1996) Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff, and S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 52-133. BoP
Searle, John (1975) Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole, and J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 59-82.
Steensig, Jakob (2001a) Sprog i virkeligheden. Bidrag til en interaktionel lingvistik. [Language in the reality. Contributions to an interactional linguistics]. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
(2001b) Notes on turn-construction methods in Danish and Turkish conversation. In M. Selting, and E. Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), Studies in interactional linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 259-286.
Teleman, Ulf, Staffan Hellberg, and Erik Andersson (1999) Svenska Akademiens grammatik. [The Swedish Academy’s grammar], volume 4. Stockholm: Svenska Akademien.
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (forthcoming) Grammar and everyday talk: Building responsive actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wide, Camilla (2009) Interactional Construction Grammar: Contextual features of determination in dialectal Swedish. In A. Bergs, and G. Diewald (eds.), Context and constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 111-142.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Droste, Pepe & Susanne Günthner
2021. Enacting ‘Being with You’. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 31:1 ► pp. 87 ff.
Lindström, Jan, Camilla Lindholm, Inga-Lill Grahn & Martina Huhtamäki
2020. Consecutive clause combinations in instructing activities. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32], ► pp. 245 ff.
Morof, Julia
2018. Patterns of construction in spoken French. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 53:1 ► pp. 159 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
