Cover not available

Article published In: Approaches to grammar for interactional linguistics
Edited by Ritva Laury, Marja Etelämäki and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
[Pragmatics 24:3] 2014
► pp. 477–506

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Why blend conversation analysis with cognitive grammar?

Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 September 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.3.03ete
This article proposes that combining Conversation Analysis (CA) with Cognitive Grammar (CG) provides a fruitful framework for studying language as a socio-cognitive phenomenon. The authors first discuss two indexical phenomena, the Finnish demonstratives and the Finnish free-standing infinitives; these are first analyzed using the methods of CA, then rediscussed in the framework of CG. The description of both phenomena relies on the CG notion of grounding elements, i.e., the elements that conceptualize some facet of the ground (speech situation) as part of their meaning. The authors argue that such meaning associated with grammar includes knowledge about the schematic organization of the ground, and that the grammatical means for conceptualizing the ground make dynamic co-construction of the speech situation possible. Whereas the authors rely on the terminology of CG when describing the con-strual of the ground, they strongly underline the fact that the ways in which the ground is construed can only be found out using the methods of CA. In this way, combining CA with CG can offer us an approach where language is analyzed as the interface of the human mind and the social world.
References (79)
Auer, Peter (2005) Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text 25.1: 7-36.  BoP Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barlow, Michael, and Suzanne Kemmer (eds.) (2000) Usage Based Models of Language. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, and Paul Hopper (eds.) (2001) Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Units. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cornish, Francis (1999) Anaphora, Discourse and Understanding: Evidence from English and French. Oxford: Clarendon Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen Elizabeth (this volume) What does grammar tell us about action? Pragmatics 24.3: 623-647.
Croft, William (2009) Towards a social cognitive linguistics. In V. Evans, and S. Pourcel (eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 395-420. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger (2006) Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 171: 463-489. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enfield, N.J. (2003) Demonstratives in space and interaction. Data from Lao speakers and implications for semantic analysis. Language 791: 82-117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Etelämäki, Marja (2006) Toiminta ja tarkoite.Tutkimus suomen pronominista “tämä” [Activity and referent. A study on the Finnish pronoun tämä ]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009) The Finnish demonstrative pronouns in light of interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 411: 21-46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Etelämäki, Marja, and Minna Jaakola (2009) Tota ja puhetilanteen todellisuus [The particle tota and the reality of speech situation]. Virittäjä 21: 188-212.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Etelämäki, Marja, Minna Jaakola, Ilona Herlin, and Laura Visapää (2009) Kielioppi käsitteistyksenä ja toimintana. Kognitiivista kielioppia ja keskustelunanalyysia yhdistämässä. [Grammar as conceptualization and as action. Combining Cognitive Grammar and Conversation Analysis]. Virittäjä 21: 162-187.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas, and Stephen C. Levinson (2009) The myth of language universals. Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 321: 429-448. doi:
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. (1988) The mechanisms of “construction grammar”. In Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society 141: 35-55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia, and Barbara Fox (1996) Interactional motivations for reference formulation: He had. This guy had, a beautiful, thirty-two O:lds. In B.A. Fox (ed.), Studies in Anaphora. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 145-168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia, Barbara Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson (2002) Constituency and turn increments. In C. Ford, B. Fox, and S. Thompson (eds.), The Language of Turns and Sequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 14-38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003) Social interaction and grammar. In M. To-masello (ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Vol. 2. London: Erlbaum, pp. 119-144.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glynn, Dylan, and Kerstin Fischer (eds.) (2010) Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-driven Approaches. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erwing (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles (1979) The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, pp. 97-121.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003) Pointing as Situated Practice. In S. Kita (ed.), Pointing: Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 217-241.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin (1987) Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. Pragmatics 1.1: 1-55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th., and Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.) (2006) Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-based Approaches to Syntax And Lexis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  MetBibGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Günthner, Suzanne (2000) Vorwurfsaktivitäten in der Alltagsinteraktion. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli (ed.) (1989) Suomalaisen keskustelun keinoja I. [Characteristics of Finnish Conversation I]. Kieli 4. Department of Finnish, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001) On some uses of the discourse particle kyllä in Finnish conversations. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, and M. Selting (eds.), Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 171-198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, and Eeva-Leena Seppänen (1992) Finnish kato: from verb to particle. Journal of Pragmatics 181: 527-549.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanks, William F. (1990) Referential Practice. Language and Lived Space among the Maya. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1992) The indexical ground of deictic reference. In A. Duranti, and C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context. Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 43-76.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005) Explorations in the deictic field. Current Anthropology 46.2: 191-220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John (1996 [1984]) Harold Garfinkel ja etnometodologia. [Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology]. Transl. I. Arminen, O. Paloposki, A. Peräkylä, S. Vehviläinen, and S. Veijola. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011) Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Empathic moments in interaction. T. Stivers, L. Mondada, and J. Steensig (eds.), The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 159-183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasson, Uri, Asif A. Ghanzafar, Bruno Galantucci, Simon Garrod, and Christian Keysers (2012) Brain-to-brain coupling: A mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Science 161: 114-121. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.007 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Itkonen, Terho (1966) Tutkimus suomen asyndetonista. [A study on Finnish asyndeton]. Virittäjä 701: 402-423.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1979) Zur Sematik und Pragmatik der Finnischen Demonstrativa. In C. Gläser, and J. Pustzay (eds.), Festschrift für Wolfgang Schalchter zum 70. Geburtstag. Veröf fentlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica 12. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp. 113-127.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaakola, Minna (2004) Suomen genetiivi [Finnish genitive]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail (1988) On the sequential organization of troubles talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems 35.4: 418-442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo (2003) From Interaction to Grammar. Estonian Finite Verb Forms in Conversation. Uppsala, Sweden: Studia Uralica Upsaliensia 34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne (2011) Functions in the individual and in the community. Paper presented at the Symposium on Functions, Functionalism and Linguistics. LSA Winter Meeting, Pittsburgh, January 2011.
Koivisto, Aino (2012) Discouse patterns for turn-final conjunctions. Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1254– 1272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laitinen, Lea (1995) Nollapersoona. [Zero person]. Virittäjä 991: 337-358.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006) Zero person in Finnish. A grammatical resource for construing human evidence. In M-L. Helasvuo, and L. Campbell (eds.), Grammar from the Human Perspective. Case, space and person in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 209-232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Kund (1994) Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus and the Mental Repre-sentatins of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1990) Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 11: 5-38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume II: Descriptive Application. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1999) Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2001) Discourse in Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 121: 143-188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2002) Deixis and subjectivity. In F. Brisard (ed.), Grounding. The Epistemic Footing of Deixis and Reference. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1-28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008) Cognitive grammar. A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014) Subordination in a dynamic account of grammar. In J. Kalliokoski, H. Sorva, and L. Visapää (eds.), Contexts of Subordination. Cognitive, typological and discourse perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 17-72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larjavaara, Matti (2007) Pragmasemantiikka [Pragma-semantics]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002) Interaction, grounding and third-person reference forms. In F. Brisard (ed.), Grounding. The Epistemic Footing of Deixis and Reference. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 83-111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leino, Jaakko (2003) Antaa se muuttua. Suomen kielen permissiivirakenne ja sen kehitys. [Let it change. The Finnish permissive construction and its history]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. (2006) On the human “interaction engine”. In S.C. Levinson, and N.J. Enfield (eds.), Roots of human sociality. Oxford: Berg, pp. 39-69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004) On some principles of a dialogical grammar. In K. Aijmer (ed.), Dialogue Analysis VIII: Understanding and misunderstanding in dialogue. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 7-23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009) Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazeland, Harrie, and Mike Huiskes (2001) Dutch but as a sequential conjuction. In M. Selting, and E. Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 141-169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mielikäinen, Aila (1991) Murteiden murros: Levikkikarttoja nykypuhekielen piirteistä. [Circulation maps of features of present-day spoken language]. Jyväskylän yliopiston suomen kielen laitoksen julkaisuja 36. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noordzij, Matthijas, Sarah E. Newman-Norlund, Jan Peter de Ruiter, Peter Hagoort, Stephen C. Levinson, and Ivan Toni (2009) Brain mechanisms underlying human communication. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 3: 14. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.014.2009 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Onikki-Rantajääskö, Tiina (2001) Sarjoja. Nykysuomen paikallissijaiset olotilanilmaukset kielen analogisuuden ilmentäjinä. Helsinki: Finnish Literatre Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi, and Sandra A. Thompson (1995) What can conversation tell us about syntax? In P.W. Davis (ed.), Alternative linguistics. Descriptive and theoretical modes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 213-271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penttilä, Aarni (1963 [1957]) Suomen kielioppi [Finnish grammar]. 2nd, revised edition. Porvoo: WSOY.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson (1974) A simplest systemactics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 501: 696-735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1992) Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersub-jectivity in conversatin. American Journal of Sociology 971: 1295-1345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1996) Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff, and S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 52-133.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010) Some other “uh(m)”s. Discourse Processes 471: 130-174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica VIII, 4: 289-327.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Setälä, Emil Nestor (1880) Suomen kielen lauseoppi. Oppikirjan koe. [Finnish syntax. A textbook]. Helsinki: K.E. Holm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1976) Shifters, verbal categories, and cultural description. In K.H. Basso, and H.A. Selby (eds.), Meaning in Anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 11-55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena (2001) Responding in Conversation. A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Visapää, Laura (2008) Infinitiivi ja sen infiniittisyys. Tutkimus suomen kielen itsenäisistä A-infinitiivikonstruktioista. [Infinitive and its infinity. A study of the independent A-infinitive constructions]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(forthcoming) Infinitives revisited: An interactional and cognitive approach. Manuscript under revision.
Zlatev, Jordan A. (2008) The co-evolution of intersubjectivity and bodily mimesis. In J. Zlatev, T. Racine, C. Sinha, and E. Itkonen (eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 215-244  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010) Phenomenology and cognitive linguistics. In S. Callagher (ed.), Handbook on Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Berlin: Springer, pp. 415-446. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Granvik, Anton, Veera Hatakka, Olli O. Silvennoinen, Riku Erkkilä & Eveliina Mäntylä
2025. Beyond corpus data — complementary and alternative methods in cognitive linguistics. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 23:2 ► pp. 327 ff. DOI logo
Visapää, Laura
2022. Infinitives of affect and intersubjectivity: on the indexical interpretation of the Finnish independent infinitives. Cognitive Linguistics 33:3 ► pp. 521 ff. DOI logo
Knapton, Olivia
2020. Negotiating embodied space in anxiety narratives. Metaphor and the Social World 10:2 ► pp. 233 ff. DOI logo
Li, Yinmei & Yi’na Wang
2019. Simona Pekarek Doehler, Elwys De Stefani & Anne-Sylvie Horlacher (eds.) Time and emergence in grammar: Dislocation, topicalization and hanging topic in French talk-in-interaction . Functions of Language 26:2 ► pp. 258 ff. DOI logo
Etelämäki, Marja
2016. Introduction: Discourse, grammar and intersubjectivity. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39:2 ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Herlin, Ilona & Laura Visapää
2016. Dimensions of empathy in relation to language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39:2 ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Möttönen, Tapani
2016. Dependence of construal on linguistic and pre-linguistic intersubjectivity. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39:2 ► pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Möttönen, Tapani
2019. The normative basis of construal. In Normativity in language and linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 209], ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
ZIMA, ELISABETH & GEERT BRÔNE
2015. Cognitive Linguistics and interactional discourse: time to enter into dialogue. Language and Cognition 7:4 ► pp. 485 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue