Cover not available

Article published In: The interaction between context and grammar in Functional Discourse Grammar
Edited by Nuria Alturo, Evelien Keizer and Lluís Payrató
[Pragmatics 24:2] 2014
► pp. 297–316

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Activation and the relation between context and grammar

Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 June 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.2.06gar
Functional Discourse Grammar is characterized as the grammatical component of a wider theory of verbal interaction and is linked to two adjacent components: The Conceptual and the Contextual Components. One general property of these components is that they are not open-ended, but are said to contain only that extra-linguistic information which is relevant for the construction and interpretation of the immediate linguistic expression. In this contribution I explore the relation between context and grammar and I conclude that the FDG’s requirement that the Contextual Component should only contain those features which have a systematic impact on grammar is too strict. In particular, I claim that the Contextual Component is relevant in linguistic usage through speakers’ mental representation of its contents, which could be captured in the Conceptual Component. I further argue that the notions of ‘activation’ and ‘sharedness’ are relevant to understanding the motivation of two syntactic processes, subject raising and extraction from NPs, and should therefore find a place in the model even if they do not always lead to systematic effects. It is finally proposed that these pragmatic dimensions could find their way into the grammar by means of unmarked pragmatic configurations or content frames.
References (30)
Bolkestein, A. Machtelt (1998) What to do with Topic and Focus? Evaluating pragmatic information. In Mike Hannay, and A. Machtelt Bolkestein (eds.), Functional Grammar and Verbal Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 193-214.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher S. (2008) Interpersonal meaning in the noun phrase. In Jan Rijkhoff, and Daniel García Velascol (eds.), The Noun Phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 221-261.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013) A reappraisal of the functional enterprise, with particular reference to Functional Discourse Grammar. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 671: 13-42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace (1994) Discourse, Consciousness and Time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Connolly, John H. (2007) Context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Alfa 511: 11-33.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cornish, Francis (2009) Text and discourse as context: Discourse anaphora and the FDG contextual component. In Evelien Keizer, and Gerry Wanders (eds.), Special Issue: The London papers I. Web Papers in Functional Discourse Grammar, pp. 97-115.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davison, Alice (1984) Syntactic markedness and the definition of sentence topic. Language 601: 797-846.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. (1997a) The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1. The Structure of the Clause. [Kees Hengeveld (ed.)]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1997b) The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 2. Complex and Derived Constructions. [Kees Hengeveld (ed.)]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi (2007) Information Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Velasco, Daniel (2008) Functional Discourse Grammar and extraction from (complex) noun phrases. In Jan Rijkhoff, and Daniel García Velasco (eds.), The Noun Phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 321-363.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013) Raising in Functional Discourse Grammar. In J. Lachlan Mackenzie, and Hella Olbertz (eds.), Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 249-276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy (1984) Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Volume II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. (2006) Constructions at Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees (2004) Epilogue. In J. Lachlan Mackenzie, and María Ángeles Gómez González (eds.), A New Architecture for Functional Grammar. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 365-378. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees, and J. Lachlan Mackenzie (2008) Functional Discourse Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(this issue) Grammar and context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Pragmatics 24.2: 203-227.
Keizer, Evelien (this issue) Context and cognition in FDG: What, where and why? Pragmatics 24.2: 399-423.
Lambrecht, Knud (1994) Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan (2012) Cognitive adequacy in a dialogic Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences 341: 421-432. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(this issue) The Contextual Component in a dialogic FDG. Pragmatics 24.2: 249-273.
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan, and Evelien Keizer (1991) On assigning pragmatic functions in English. Pragmatics 11: 169-215.  BoP Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mair, Christian (1990) Infinitival complement clauses in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk (1997) The choice between infinitives and that-clauses after believe. English Language and Linguistics 11: 271-284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. (1974) On Raising. One rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. (1981) Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 223-256.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, John R. (1986) [1967] Infinite Syntax. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Company. First published as Constraints on variables in Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smit, Niels (2007) Information packaging in Functional Discourse Grammar. Alfa: Revista de Lingüística 511: 91-118.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vallduví, E. (1993) The Informational Component. Standford: CSLI Dissertations.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Cornish, Francis
2022. Text, discourse, context: A meta-trilogy for discourse analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 199 ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Velasco, Daniel García
2022. Modification and context. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 524 ff. DOI logo
Giomi, Riccardo
2015. Grammar, context and the hearer. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
O’Neill, Gareth
2015. Humming, whistling, singing, and yelling in Pirahã context and channels of communication in FDG. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 349 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue