Cover not available

Article published In: The interaction between context and grammar in Functional Discourse Grammar
Edited by Nuria Alturo, Evelien Keizer and Lluís Payrató
[Pragmatics 24:2] 2014
► pp. 249–273

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

The contextual component in a dialogic FDG

Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 June 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.2.04mac
Functional Discourse Grammar (FDG) has to date been explicitly oriented to modelling the grammar of the individual speaker, with the Contextual Component being seen as supportive. If FDG is re-interpreted as dialogic, the Contextual Component emerges as being shared by all interactants in the dialogue and as playing a central role in interaction. A dialogic FDG is proposed to provide a basis for understanding the role of interpersonal alignment in conversation as well as reflecting developments in psycholinguistics. It is applied to the analysis of eight extracts from a dialogue transcription in Eggins and Slade (2005).
References (39)
Arnold, Jennifer E. (2008) Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes. Language and Cognitive Processes 231: 495-527.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakker, Dik (1999) FG expression rules: From templates to constituent structure. Working Papers in Functional Grammar 67. University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001) The FG expression rules: A dynamic model. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 421: 15-54.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005) Agreement: More arguments for the dynamic expression model. In Casper de Groot, and Kees Hengeveld (eds.), Morphosyntactic expression in Functional Grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1-40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bargh, John (2006) What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology 361: 147-168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, J. Kathryn (1996) Language production: Methods and methodologies. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 31: 395-421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branigan, Holly P., Martin J. Pickering, and Alexandra A. Cleland (2000) Syntactic coordination in dialogue. Cognition 751: B13-B25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Andy (2008) Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. (1996) Using Language. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Deanna Wilkes-Gibb (1986) Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 221: 1-39.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Connolly, John H. (2007) Context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Alfa 51/21: 11-33.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne, and Diana Slade (2005) Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferreira, Victor S., and J. Kathryn Bock (2006) The functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Processes 211: 1011-1029. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson (2002) Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), The language of turn and sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 14-38.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gómez González, María de los Ángeles (2011) Lexical cohesion in multiparty conversations. Language Sciences 331: 167-179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul (1975) Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole, and Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol 3. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K., and Ruqaiya Hasan (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasson, Uri, Asif A. Ghazanfar, Bruno Galantucci, Simon Garrod, and Christian Keysers (2012) Brain-to-brain coupling: A mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16/21: 114-121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees (2005) Dynamic expression in Functional Discourse Grammar. In Casper de Groot, and Kees Hengeveld (eds.), Morphosyntactic expression in Functional Grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 53-86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees, and J. Lachlan Mackenzie (2008) Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(this volume) Grammar and context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Pragmatics 24.2: 203-227.
Iacoboni, Marco (2005) Understanding others: Imitation, language, and empathy. In Susan Hurley, and Nick Chater (eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science. Vol. 1: Mechanisms of imitation and imitation in animals. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp. 77-99.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Mirroring People: The New Science of how we Connect with Others. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Isaac, Ellen A., and Herbert H. Clark (1987) References in conversations between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1161: 26-37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kempson, Ruth, and Ronnie Cann (2007) Dynamic Syntax: Preliminaries for a dialogue-driven account of syntactic change. In Joseph C. Salmons, and Shannon Dubenion-Smith (eds.), Historical Linguistics 2005. Amsterdam and Philadelphia PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 73-101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, Willem J.M. (1989) Speaking. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1999) A blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown, and P. Hagoort (eds.), The neurocognition of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 83-122.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. (2000) Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.  BoP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linell, Per (2007) Dialogicality in languages, minds and brains: Is there a convergence between dialogism and neuro-biology? Language Sciences 291: 605-620. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan (2012) Cognitive adequacy in a dialogic Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences 341: 421-432. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, Martin J., and Victor S. Ferreira (2008) Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin 134/11: 427-459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, Martin J., and Steven Garrod (2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 271: 169-226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poesio, Massimo, and Hannes Rieser (2010) Completions, coordination, and alignment in dialogue. Dialogue and Discourse 1. [URL], accessed 26 October 2011 .
Schober, Michael F., and Susan E. Brennan (2003) Processes of interactive spoken discourse: The role of the partner. In Arthur C. Graesser, Morton A. Gernsbacher, and Susan R. Goldman (eds.), Handbook of discourse processes. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 123-164.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (2006) Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. (2nd edition.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda (2010) Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam and Philadelphia PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Taverniers, Miriam
2021. Modelling interfaces with context in SFL. Functions of Language 28:3 ► pp. 291 ff. DOI logo
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2016. Dynamicity and dialogue. English Text Construction 9:1 ► pp. 56 ff. DOI logo
Connolly, John H.
2015. The Contextual Component within a dynamic implementation of the FDG model. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Giomi, Riccardo
2015. Grammar, context and the hearer. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
2015. Grammar and context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
García Velasco, Daniel
2014. Activation and the relation between context and grammar. Pragmatics 24:2 ► pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
García Velasco, Daniel
2015. Activation and the relation between context and grammar. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
GARCÍA VELASCO, Daniel
2017. Modularity and derivation in Functional Discourse Grammar. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 33:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Velasco, Daniel García
2022. Modification and context. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 524 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue