Article published In: The interaction between context and grammar in Functional Discourse Grammar
Edited by Nuria Alturo, Evelien Keizer and Lluís Payrató
[Pragmatics 24:2] 2014
► pp. 203–227
Grammar and context in Functional Discourse Grammar
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 1 June 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.2.02hen
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.2.02hen
This article presents a proposal for the organization of the Contextual Component in Functional Discourse Grammar. A guiding principle in this proposal is that, given the fact that Functional Discourse Grammar is a theory of grammar, the Contextual Component should provide the information that is necessary for a proper functioning of the grammar rather than aim at an exhaustive specification of all the information that plays a role in interpreting linguistic expressions. The Contextual Component contains situational and discursive information and is organized in different strata that correspond to the interpersonal, representational, morphosyntactic, and phonological levels of representation within the grammar. The contextual representations make use of the same formalizations as the corresponding linguistic representations, thus allowing for direct exchange of information between the Grammatical and the Contextual Components. Thus exchange of information is handled by an interface called the contextualizer. The article illustrates the functioning of this model by analyzing the role of contextual information with respect to three grammatical phenomena in three different languages: Unexpressed arguments in Turkish, English too, and answers to yes/no questions in European Portuguese.
References (17)
. (this volume) The Contextual Component within a dynamic implementation of the FDG model: Structure and interaction. Pragmatics 24.2: 229-248.
Cornish, Francis (2009) Text and discourse as context: Discourse anaphora and the FDG contextual component. In Gerry Wanders, and Evelien Keizer (eds), Web Papers in Functional Grammar WP-FDG-82, Special Issue: the London Papers I: 97-115. Available at: [URL].
Cruz, Aline da (2011) Fonologia e Gramática do Nheengatú: A língua geral falada pelos povos Baré, Warekena e Baniwa. Utrecht: LOT.
Dixon, R.M.W. (1990) The origin of “mother-in-law vocabulary” in two Australian languages. Anthropological Linguistics 331: 1-56.
Evans, Vyvyan, and Melanie Green (2006) Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Mahwah NY: Erlbaum. MetBib
Grosz, Barbara J., and Candace L. Sidner (1986) Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12.3: 175-204.
Hengeveld, Kees (2005) Dynamic expression in Functional Discourse Grammar. In Casper de Groot, and Kees Hengeveld (eds.), Morphosyntactic expression in Functional Grammar (Functional Grammar Series 27). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 53-86.
(2012) Referential markers and agreement markers in Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences 34.4: 468-479.
Hengeveld, Kees, and J. Lachlan Mackenzie (2008) Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan (this volume) The Contextual Component in a dialogic FDG. Pragmatics 24.2: 249-273.
O’Neill, Gareth (this volume) Humming, whistling, singing, and yelling in Pirahã: Context and channels of communication in FDG. Pragmatics 24.2: 349-375.
Öztürk, Balkız (2002) Turkish as a non-pro-drop language. In Eser Erguvanlı Taylan (ed.), The verb in Turkish (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 239-259.
Rijkhoff, Jan (2008) Layers, levels and contexts in Functional Discourse Grammar. In Daniel García Velasco, and Jan Rijkhoff (eds), The noun phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 63-115.
Santos, Ana Lúcia (2009) Minimal answers: Ellipsis, syntax and discourse in the acquisition of European Portuguese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Cited by (16)
Cited by 16 other publications
Keizer, Evelien, Thomas Schwaiger & Elnora ten Wolde
KEIZER, EVELIEN
Cenerini, Chantale
2018. External possessor constructions and Cree relational inflection compared. In Recent developments in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 205], ► pp. 89 ff.
Keizer, Evelien & Hella Olbertz
2018. Functional Discourse Grammar. In Recent developments in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 205], ► pp. 1 ff.
Schwaiger, Thomas
Kok, Kasper
Connolly, John H.
2015. The Contextual Component within a dynamic implementation of the FDG model. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 229 ff.
García Velasco, Daniel
2015. Activation and the relation between context and grammar. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 297 ff.
García Velasco, Daniel
2015. Activation and the relation between context and grammar. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 297 ff.
Giomi, Riccardo
2015. Grammar, context and the hearer. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 275 ff.
Giomi, Riccardo
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2015. The contextual component in a dialogic FDG. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 249 ff.
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
O’Neill, Gareth
2015. Humming, whistling, singing, and yelling in Pirahã context and channels of communication in FDG. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 349 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
