Article published In: Pragmatics
Vol. 36:2 (2026) ► pp.254–275
Dual function of (inter)subjectivity in the use of well as a discourse marker
Published online: 20 January 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23026.tak
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23026.tak
Abstract
It is widely acknowledged that subjective elements emerge in the initial position of an utterance, known as the
left periphery, whereas intersubjective elements typically emerge in the final position, referred to as the right periphery.
However, this functional asymmetry is not invariably maintained. This study advances the argument that the discourse marker
well can serve a dual purpose, simultaneously expressing both a speaker’s subjectivity and intersubjectivity
at the outset of an utterance, specifically on the left periphery. Essentially, well indexes the speaker’s
subjectivity mediated through intersubjectivity. Additionally, the study explores the intricate relationship between
intersubjectivity and the textual function of well as a discourse marker. This study reveals that intersubjective
functions can contribute to the development of textual functions.
Keywords: discourse marker, periphery, politeness, (inter)subjectivity, well, textuality
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Conceptual background
- 2.1Discourse markers
- 2.2Grammaticalization of discourse markers
- 2.3(Inter)subjectification and (inter)subjectivity
- 3.Motivations for the use of well as a discourse marker on the left periphery
- 4.(Inter)subjectivity in the functions of well as a discourse marker
- 4.1Subjective function
- 4.2The dual use of (inter)subjectivity
- 5.The relation between (inter)subjectivity and textual functions
- 6.Concluding remarks
- Transcription convention
- Acknowledgments
- Notes
Corpora References
References (44)
Aijmer, Karin. 2013. Understanding
Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic
Approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Aijmer, Karin, Ad Foolen, and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen. 2006. “Pragmatic
Markers in Translation: A Methodological Proposal.” In Approaches to
Discourse Particles, ed. by Kerstin Fischer, 101–114. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Aijmer, Karin, and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen. 2003. “The
Discourse Particle Well and its Equivalents in Swedish and
Dutch.” Linguistics 411: 1123–1161.
Beeching, Kate. 2016. Pragmatic
Markers in British English: Meaning in Social
Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beeching, Kate, and Yu-Fang Wang. 2014. “Motivations
for Meaning Shift at the Left and Right Periphery: Well, Bon, and
Hao.” In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right
Periphery, ed. by Kate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, 47–71. Leiden: Brill.
Beeching, Kate, and Ulrich Detges (eds). 2014. Discourse
Functions at the Left and Right
Periphery. Leiden: Brill.
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English:
Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
2017. The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers in
English: Pathways of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness:
Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman. 1960. “The
Pronouns of Power and Solidarity.” In Style in
Language, ed. by Thomas Albert Sebeok, 253–276. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Carlson, Lauri. 1984. “Well”
in Dialogue Games: A Discourse Analysis of the Interjection “Well” in Idealized
Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Defour, Tine. 2008. “The
Speaker’s Voice: A Diachronic Study on the Use of Well and Now as Pragmatic
Markers.” English Text
Construction 11: 62–82.
Defour, Tine, and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen. 2010. “‘Positive
Appraisal’ as a Core Meaning of Well: A Corpus-Based Analysis in Middle and Early Modern English
Data.” English
Studies 911: 643–673.
Degand, Liesbeth, and Benjamin Fagard. 2011. “Alors
Between Discourse and Grammar: The Role of Syntactic Position.” Functions of
Language 181: 19–56.
Dér, Csilla Ilona. 2010. “On the Status of Discourse
Markers.” Acta Linguistica
Hungarica 571: 3–28.
Detges, Ulrich, and Richard Waltereit. 2014. “Moi
je ne sais pas vs. Je ne sais pas moi : French Disjoint Pronouns in the Left vs. Right
Periphery.” In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right
Periphery, ed. by Kate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, 24–46. Leiden: Brill.
Du Bois, John W. 2006. “Representing
Discourse.” University of California, Santa Barbara. [URL]
Fraser, Bruce. 2009. “An
Account of Discourse Markers.” International Review of
Pragmatics 11: 293–320.
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame
Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of
Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2004. “On
Directionality in Language Change with Particular Reference to
Grammaticalization.” In Up and Down the Cline: The Nature of
Grammaticalization, ed. by Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde, and Harry Perridon, 17–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lehmann, Christian. 2004. “Theory
and Method in Grammaticalization.” Zeitschrift für Germanistische
Linguistik 321: 152–187.
Onodera, Noriko O. 2007. “Interplay of
(Inter)Subjectivity and Social Norm.” Journal of Historical
Pragmatics 81: 239–267.
2011. “Grammaticalization of Discourse
Markers.” In The Oxford Handbook of
Grammaticalization, ed. by Bernd Heine, and Heiko Narrog, 614–624. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2014. “Setting Up a Mental Space: A
Function of Discourse Markers at the Left Periphery (LP) and Some Observations about LP and RP in
Japanese.” In Discourse Functions at the Left and Right
Periphery, ed. by Kate Beeching, and Ulrich Detges, 92–116. Leiden: Brill.
Owen, Marion. 1981. “Conversational
Units and the Use of ‘Well’.” In Conversation and
Discourse, ed. by Paul Werth, 99–116. London: Croom Helm.
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing
and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn
Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation
Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schourup, Lawrence C. 1985. Common Discourse Particles in English
Conversation. New York: Garland Publishing.
Takamura, Ryo. 2021. “A
Motivation for Politeness from Interpersonal to Textual Mode: The Case of Well as a Discourse
Marker.” Paper presented at the 17th International Pragmatic
Conference, Winterthur, Switzerland (virtual conference: Webex meeting), 27 June to 2 July
2021.
. 2023. Discourse
Marker Well in Spoken American English: Some Suggestions for Politeness and
Cross-Linguistics. Yokohama: Shumpusha.
Tannen, Deborah. 2007. Talking
Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse, 2nd
ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1982. “From Propositional to Textual
and Expressive Meanings: Some Semantic-Pragmatic Aspects of
Grammaticalization.” In Perspectives on Historical
Linguistics, ed. by Winfred P. Lehmann, and Yakov Malkiel, 245–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
1995. “The Role of the Development of
Discourse Markers in a Theory of Grammaticalization.” Paper presented
at ICHL XII, Manchester, August
1995.
1999. “From Subjectification to
Intersubjectification.” Paper presented at the Workshop on
Historical Pragmatics, 14th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Vancouver,
Canada.
2003. “From Subjectification to
Intersubjectification.” In Motives for Language
Change, ed. by Raymond Hickey, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2010a. “Grammaticalization.” In Historical
Pragmatics, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 97–126. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
2010b. “(Inter)Subjectivity and
(Inter)Subjectification: A Reassessment.” In Subjectification,
Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, ed. by Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte, and Hubert Cuyckens, 29–71. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
2012. “Intersubjectification and
Clause Periphery.” English Text
Construction 51: 7–28.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Takamura, Ryo
2025. The role of well as a response-delaying marker in side story insertions. Pragmatics and Society
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
