Article published In: Pragmatics: Online-First Articles
Identity in guanxi space
An indigenous pragmatic study from Chinese culture
Published online: 25 April 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23017.yua
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23017.yua
Abstract
This article argues that identity among the Chinese is operated and must be interpreted in guanxi
space, which is the essence of identity in Chinese culture. This can be further summarized as identity in guanxi
space, i.e., identity is regulated and operated in the sphere of the four-dimensional quadrants of vertical and horizontal axes.
This article thus claims the following about the model of identity in the guanxi space: it embodies the
interpersonal, pragmatic characteristics of Chinese culture; it overcomes (to some extent) the neglect of the third party in
previous pragmatic analyses; and it constitutes the contribution of indigenous Chinese culture to international pragmatic
studies.
Keywords: identity, guanxi space, indigenous study, shenfen, zun and qin
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Previous studies on identity
- 3.Identity in guanxi space model
- 3.1Framing identity in Chinese guanxi space
- 3.2Critical evaluations on relational identity
- 3.3A proposed model of identity operation in guanxi space
- 4.Using the model
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (50)
Ameka, Felix K., and Marina Terkourafi. 2019. “What
If…? Imagining Non-Western Perspectives on Pragmatic Theory and Practice.” Journal of
Pragmatics 1451: 72–82.
Benwell, Bethan, and Elizabeth Stokoe. 2006. Discourse
and Identity. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Universals
in Language Usage: Politeness
Phenomena. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2005. “Identity
and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse
Studies 7 (4–5): 585–614.
Chan, Wing-Tsit 陈荣捷. 1969. A Source Book in Chinese
Philosophy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Chang, Hui-Ching, and Richard Holt. 1994. “A
Chinese Perspective on Face as Inter-Relation Concern.” In The
Challenge of Facework, ed. by Stella Ting-Toomey, 95–132. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Chen, Jing, and Xin Zhao. 2023. “An
Empirical Study of Chinese University Student Advisors’ Dynamic Identity Construction in the Context of Individual
Consultation.” Pragmatics 331: 23–48.
Chen, Xinren. 2018. “On
the Construction of Chinese Disciplinary Discourse System of Pragmatics.” Foreign Language
Education 51: 12–16.
Chung, Wai Keung, and Gary Hamilton. 2001. “Social
Logic as Business Logic: Guanxi, Trustworthiness and the Embeddedness of Chinese Business
Practices.” In Rules and Networks: The Legal Culture of Global
Business Transactions, ed. by Richard P. Appelbaum, William L. F. Felstiner, and Volkmar Gessner, 17–40. Oxford: Hart.
Feng, Wenjing, and Xinren Chen. 2020. “Identity
(Self-)Deconstruction in Chinese Police’s Civil Conflict
Mediation.” Pragmatics 30 (3): 326–350.
Gao, Shiqi 高士奇. 1979. Zuozhuan
jishiben左转记事本末 [The Event-Based Historical
Records of Tso Chuan]. Beijing: China Publishing House.
Garces-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2013. “Introduction-Face,
Identity and Im/Politeness: Looking Backward, Moving Forward from Goffman to Practice
Theory.” Journal of Politeness
Research 91: 3–33.
Garces-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, and Maria Sifanou. 2017. “(Im)Politeness
and Identity.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic
(Im)Politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 227–256. Palgrave Macmillan.
Goffman, Erving. 1955. “On
Face-Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction.” Psychiatry: Journal for the
Study of Interpersonal
Processes 181: 213–231.
Hanks, William, Sachiko Ide, and Yasuhiro Katagiri. 2009. “Towards
an Emancipatory Pragmatics.” Journal of
Pragmatics 411: 1–9.
Hu, Pingsheng, and Meng Zhang 胡平生 张萌. 2017. Liji
Yizhu礼记译注 [Translation and Annotation of the
Book of Rites]. Beijing: China Publishing House.
Huang, Guangguo. 1987. “Face
and Favor: The Chinese Power Game.” American Journal of
Sociology 92 (4): 944–974.
Joseph, John E. 2013. “Identity Work and Face Work
Across Linguistic and Cultural Boundaries.” Journal of Politeness
Research 91: 35–54.
King, Ambrose Yeo-chi. 1991. “Kuanhsi and Network
Building: A Sociological
Interpretation.” Daedalus 120 (2): 109–126.
Li, Chengtuan, Yongping Ran, and Daniel Kádár. 2018. “Constructing
Self-Expert Identity via Other-Identity Negation in Chinese Televised Debating Discourse.” Text
and
Talk 38 (4): 435–455.
Li, Qiang. 1993. Social
Stratification and Mobility in Contemporary
China. Beijing: Economic Press China.
Liang, Shuming. 1987. Eastern
and Western Cultures and Their
Philosophies. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Markus, Hazel R., and Shinobu Kitayama. 1991. “Culture
and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation.” Psychological
Review 98 (2): 224–253.
Miller, Elizabeth R. 2013. “Positioning Selves, Doing
Relational Work and Constructing Identities in Interview Talk.” Journal of Politeness
Research 91: 75–95.
Qin, Xuqin. 2006. Good
Eloquence is Wealth: Selected Essays of Wang
Xijie. Changsha: Hunan Normal University Press.
Ran, Yongping, and Linsen Zhao. 2018. “A
New Interpersonal Relationship Model Based on Renqing Principle: A Grassroots Perspective on Interpersonal
Pragmatics.” Foreign Languages and Their
Teaching 21: 34–45.
Eno, Robert. 2016. Mencius:
An Online Teaching Translation. [URL]
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2000. “Face,
(Im)Politeness and Rapport.” In Culturally Speaking. Culture,
Communication and Politeness Theory, ed. by Helen Spencer-Oatey, 11–47. London: Continuum.
. 2005. “(Im)Politeness,
Face and Perceptions of Rapport: Unpackaging Their Bases and Interrelationships.” Journal of
Politeness Research 11: 95–119.
Stets, Jan E., and Peter J. Burke. 2000. “Identity
Theory and Social Identity Theory.” Social Psychology
Quarterly 63 (3): 224–237.
Tajfel, Henri. 1978. Differentiation
Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Academic Press.
Tracy, Karen, and Jessica S. Robles. 2013. Everyday
Talk: Building and Reflecting Identities. New York: The Guilford Press.
Turner, John C. 2010. “Social Categorization and the
Self-Concept: A Social Cognitive Theory of Group
Behavior.” In Rediscovering Social
Identity, ed. by Tom Postmes, and Nyla R. Branscombe, 243–272. Psychology Press.
Yang, Guoshu. 2004. A
Localization Research on the Psychology and Behavior of
Chinese. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.
Yang, Yiyin. 1995. “On
Interpersonal Relationship and Its Classification.” Sociological
Studies 51: 18–23.
Yuan, Zhou-min. 2011. “The
Study of Identity from the Social Psychological and Pragmatic Perspective.” Foreign Language
Research 41: 77–81.
. 2018. “Exploring
Chinese College Students’ Construction of Online Identity on the Sina Microblog.” Discourse,
Context & Media 61: 43–51.
. 2020. “Identity
Rhetoric in Chinese Radio-Mediated Medical Consultation.” Eastern Asian
Pragmatics 11: 41–65.
Yuan, Zhou-min, Hao Wang, and Li Yang. 2024. “Chinese
University Faculty Supervisors’ Academic Identity Construction in Online Profiles.” Humanities
and Social Sciences
Communications 111: 434–453.